MENU
How can Lean-Agile leaders exemplify the SAFe Core Value of alignment?
According to theGovernment Articleon the Scaled Agile Framework website, using firm fixed price contracts may significantly affect lead time for systems development. The article states that ''Firm fixed price (FFP) contracts are often used in government programs, but they are not well suited for Agile development. FFP contracts typically require detailed specifications and fixed scope, which are incompatible with the iterative and adaptive nature of Agile. FFP contracts also create a misalignment of incentives between the contractor and the government, as they reward the contractor for delivering the minimum acceptable solution, rather than the best possible value. FFP contracts also discourage collaboration and feedback, as any change in scope or requirements may trigger lengthy negotiations and contract modifications.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, using firm fixed price contracts. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the types of decisions that may significantly affect lead time for systems development. Using relative size estimating (B) is a common Agile practice that helps teams plan and track their work. Approved budget, required development tools, and dedicated team members are enablers, not impediments, of systems development. Prioritizing the product backlog using WSJF (D) is a method of applying an economic view to optimize value delivery.