Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Posted by Dusti on Sep 14, 2024 at 04:15 AM

Which statement is true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program?

Suggested Answer: A

According to theVisualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengthsarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The article states that ''To improve the economics of handling smaller batches---and thus increase throughput---teams must focus on reducing the transaction costs of any batch. This is a continuous improvement activity that happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the statements that are true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program. Batch size is not optimized immediately by looking at transaction and holding costs (B), as it takes time for teams to understand the nature of the work, identify bottlenecks, and find the optimal batch size that minimizes both costs. Batch size is not already optimized if there is continuous flow , as optimization involves finding the right balance between batch size and costs, even within a continuous flow environment. Batch size is not optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change (D), as holding costs and transaction costs can change over time due to various factors such as team size, workload, and external dependencies.


Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
36 comments · newest first
CO
Coral 11 months ago
D makes sense, but is that really realistic in practice?
AL
Alba 11 months ago
Wait, how can batch size be optimized if costs are always changing?
HO
Horace 11 months ago
C sounds right if you're already in a smooth flow.
CH
Chantell 11 months ago
I disagree, B seems more accurate for immediate optimization.
PA
Pamella 12 months ago
A is definitely true, it takes time to find the right balance.
ME
Melissia 12 months ago
D seems plausible, but I wonder if it really captures the dynamic nature of costs in practice.
SU
Sunny 12 months ago
I think C could be misleading; just because there's continuous flow doesn't mean the batch size is optimized.
SO
Solange 1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but B sounds a bit too immediate for batch size optimization. It feels like it takes time to find that balance.
GL
Gladys 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how optimizing batch sizes is a gradual process, so I think A might be correct.
FL
Flo 1 year ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this. Batch size optimization happens over time as teams find the right balance between holding and transaction costs.
RO
Rose 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the material on batch size optimization to make sure I understand the key concepts.
LU
Luann 1 year ago
Wait, is the answer really that batch size is already optimized if there's continuous flow? That doesn't sound quite right to me.
WE
Werner 1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Batch size optimization is an ongoing process as teams learn what works best for their situation.
QU
Quentin 1 year ago
Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the trade-offs between holding and transaction costs to figure out the best approach.
BE
Belen 2 years ago
This question is like asking how to get the perfect haircut - there's no one-size-fits-all answer!
GA
Gabriele 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
D) Batch size is optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change
LI
Lindsey 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
I think it depends on the specific team and their processes
AL
Alishia 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow
MA
Marg 2 years ago
↳ replying to Belen
A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost
GE
Georgeanna 2 years ago
But batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
JE
Jettie 2 years ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards A. Optimizing batch size is like finding the perfect temperature for your coffee - it takes some trial and error.
LU
Luisa 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jettie
C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow
SA
Sarah 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jettie
That makes sense. It's all about finding that sweet spot.
AN
Anna 2 years ago
↳ replying to Jettie
A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost
MO
Mozell 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C.
JU
Justine 2 years ago
D is the way to go. Once those costs stabilize, you can just set it and forget it!
AL
Alyssa 2 years ago
C seems like the obvious answer. If there's continuous flow, then the batch size must already be optimized, right?
GL
Gladys 2 years ago
B sounds good to me. Surely the experts would have already calculated the optimal batch size based on the costs.
JA
Jade 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gladys
D might be the answer. If costs rarely change, batch size could be optimized.
JU
Justine 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gladys
C seems like a good option. Continuous flow indicates optimization.
FA
Farrah 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gladys
B sounds good to me. The costs must have been considered by the experts.
LO
Lorrie 2 years ago
↳ replying to Gladys
I think A is more accurate. Batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
LA
Launa 2 years ago
I think option A is the correct answer. Batch size optimization is an ongoing process as teams gain experience and find the right balance.
CA
Carol 2 years ago
↳ replying to Launa
Yes, it's important for teams to consider both holding and transaction costs when optimizing batch sizes.
ST
Stefan 2 years ago
↳ replying to Launa
I agree, batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.
GE
Georgeanna 2 years ago
I think the answer is A.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel