Scaled Agile SAFe-SGP Exam - Topic 6 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SGP exam

Question #: 21
Topic #: 6

[All SAFe-SGP Questions]

Which statement is true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program?

ABatch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost

BBatch size is optimized immediately by looking at transaction and holding costs

CBatch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow

DBatch size is optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

According to theVisualize and Limit WIP, Reduce Batch Sizes, and Manage Queue Lengthsarticle on the Scaled Agile Framework website, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The article states that ''To improve the economics of handling smaller batches---and thus increase throughput---teams must focus on reducing the transaction costs of any batch. This is a continuous improvement activity that happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost.'' Therefore, the correct answer is A, batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost. The other options are not accurate, as they are not the statements that are true about optimizing batch sizes for newly-formed SAFe teams in a program. Batch size is not optimized immediately by looking at transaction and holding costs (B), as it takes time for teams to understand the nature of the work, identify bottlenecks, and find the optimal batch size that minimizes both costs. Batch size is not already optimized if there is continuous flow , as optimization involves finding the right balance between batch size and costs, even within a continuous flow environment. Batch size is not optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change (D), as holding costs and transaction costs can change over time due to various factors such as team size, workload, and external dependencies.

by Dusti at Sep 14, 2024, 04:15 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SGP Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Coral

3 months ago

D makes sense, but is that really realistic in practice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Alba

3 months ago

Wait, how can batch size be optimized if costs are always changing?

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

3 months ago

C sounds right if you're already in a smooth flow.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chantell

4 months ago

I disagree, B seems more accurate for immediate optimization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

4 months ago

A is definitely true, it takes time to find the right balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melissia

4 months ago

D seems plausible, but I wonder if it really captures the dynamic nature of costs in practice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sunny

4 months ago

I think C could be misleading; just because there's continuous flow doesn't mean the batch size is optimized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Solange

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but B sounds a bit too immediate for batch size optimization. It feels like it takes time to find that balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how optimizing batch sizes is a gradual process, so I think A might be correct.

upvoted 0 times

...

Flo

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this. Batch size optimization happens over time as teams find the right balance between holding and transaction costs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rose

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused on this one. I'll need to review the material on batch size optimization to make sure I understand the key concepts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

5 months ago

Wait, is the answer really that batch size is already optimized if there's continuous flow? That doesn't sound quite right to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Werner

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. Batch size optimization is an ongoing process as teams learn what works best for their situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

5 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the trade-offs between holding and transaction costs to figure out the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Belen

1 year ago

This question is like asking how to get the perfect haircut - there's no one-size-fits-all answer!

upvoted 0 times

Gabriele

1 year ago

D) Batch size is optimized when transaction and holding costs seldom change

upvoted 0 times

...

Lindsey

1 year ago

I think it depends on the specific team and their processes

upvoted 0 times

...

Alishia

1 year ago

C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow

upvoted 0 times

...

Marg

1 year ago

A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

1 year ago

But batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jettie

1 year ago

Hmm, I'm leaning towards A. Optimizing batch size is like finding the perfect temperature for your coffee - it takes some trial and error.

upvoted 0 times

Luisa

1 year ago

C) Batch size is already optimized if there is continuous flow

upvoted 0 times

...

Sarah

1 year ago

That makes sense. It's all about finding that sweet spot.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anna

1 year ago

A) Batch size optimization happens over time as teams figure out the balance between holding cost and transaction cost

upvoted 0 times

...

Mozell

1 year ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 year ago

D is the way to go. Once those costs stabilize, you can just set it and forget it!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alyssa

1 year ago

C seems like the obvious answer. If there's continuous flow, then the batch size must already be optimized, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

1 year ago

B sounds good to me. Surely the experts would have already calculated the optimal batch size based on the costs.

upvoted 0 times

Jade

1 year ago

D might be the answer. If costs rarely change, batch size could be optimized.

upvoted 0 times

...

Justine

1 year ago

C seems like a good option. Continuous flow indicates optimization.

upvoted 0 times

...

Farrah

1 year ago

B sounds good to me. The costs must have been considered by the experts.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lorrie

1 year ago

I think A is more accurate. Batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

1 year ago

I think option A is the correct answer. Batch size optimization is an ongoing process as teams gain experience and find the right balance.

upvoted 0 times

Carol

1 year ago

Yes, it's important for teams to consider both holding and transaction costs when optimizing batch sizes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefan

1 year ago

I agree, batch size optimization takes time to find the right balance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgeanna

1 year ago

I think the answer is A.

upvoted 0 times

...