Scaled Agile SAFe-SASM Exam - Topic 5 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Scaled Agile's SAFe-SASM exam

Question #: 4
Topic #: 5

Lee is a developer on the team. At every daily stand-up Lee reports, "Yesterday, I worked on indexing. Today, I will work on indexing. I have no impediments." What coaching should the Scrum Master provide Lee to improve the team's visibility into his work?

AAsk the team to break Lee's Stories into tasks for better understanding

BAssign another team member to assist Lee with indexing and ask Lee to start a different piece of work

CTell Lee to pair with another team member

DHave Lee discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

The Scrum Master should coach Lee to discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals. By framing his updates around how his work contributes to the broader objectives of the iteration, Lee can provide the team with better visibility into his progress and the impact of his work. This approach encourages team members to think beyond individual tasks and understand how their efforts align with the team's goals, fostering greater collaboration and accountability.

SAFe Scrum Master Reference

SAFe Principles: focusing on outcomes and aligning individual efforts with team goals

SAFe 5.0 framework: effective daily stand-up practices

by Vi at Aug 06, 2024, 02:02 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium SAFe-SASM Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Jennie

3 months ago

Pairing up could bring fresh ideas to the indexing process!

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanda

3 months ago

Wait, is indexing really all he's working on? Seems odd!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristeen

3 months ago

Not sure if that's the best approach, though.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

4 months ago

I agree, it would help the team see what he's actually doing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elbert

4 months ago

Lee should definitely break his work into smaller tasks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Theola

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where the focus was on visibility. I think discussing progress in relation to iteration goals, like option D suggests, could really enhance team communication.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilbert

4 months ago

I feel like pairing Lee with someone could help him gain new insights, but I’m not convinced that option C is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Susy

5 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think breaking down stories into tasks could give more clarity. So, option A might be a good approach too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hortencia

5 months ago

I remember we talked about the importance of context during stand-ups. Maybe option D could help Lee align his work with the iteration goals?

upvoted 0 times

...

Ivory

5 months ago

I feel pretty confident about this one. The Scrum Master should encourage Lee to provide more detailed updates and connect his work to the team's objectives. Pairing him with another team member could also help improve visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerardo

5 months ago

The key here is to help the team understand what Lee is actually working on and how it contributes to the overall goals. I think having him discuss his progress in the context of the iteration goals could be a good approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rasheeda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. There are a few options presented, and I'm not sure which one would be the best approach. I'll need to think through the pros and cons of each.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ellsworth

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question about improving visibility into a team member's work. I'd focus on understanding the context and the Scrum Master's role in addressing the issue.

upvoted 0 times

...

Isabelle

5 months ago

This is a tricky one, but I think the Poka yoke approach is the most relevant here. The engineer implemented a physical device to fool-proof the process and eliminate the rare defect of the caddy being left out. That's the essence of Poka yoke - designing out the possibility of human error. I'm confident that's the right answer for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

1 year ago

I think option D is also important. Lee should discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emiko

1 year ago

I'm with Latia on this one. Pair programming is the way to go. It's like a secret handshake, but with more typing and fewer high-fives.

upvoted 0 times

Shenika

1 year ago

I agree, pairing with another team member can provide more insight into Lee's progress.

upvoted 0 times

...

Anthony

1 year ago

Pair programming is definitely a good idea. It can help improve visibility into Lee's work.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latia

1 year ago

C) Pairing Lee with another team member is a great idea. That way, they can bounce ideas off each other and keep each other on track. It's like a coding buddy system!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

2 years ago

A) Breaking down Lee's stories into tasks would provide more visibility and accountability. Plus, it would give Lee a chance to show off his index-building skills.

upvoted 0 times

Allene

1 year ago

D) Have Lee discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals

upvoted 0 times

...

Chaya

1 year ago

A) Breaking down Lee's stories into tasks would provide more visibility and accountability. Plus, it would give Lee a chance to show off his index-building skills.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brice

2 years ago

I agree with Alecia. Breaking Lee's Stories into tasks will provide more visibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alecia

2 years ago

I think option A is a good idea. It will help the team understand Lee's work better.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

2 years ago

I think Lee should discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals.

upvoted 0 times

...

Willodean

2 years ago

D) Have Lee discuss his progress in the context of the Iteration goals. This way, the team can better understand how Lee's work fits into the bigger picture.

upvoted 0 times