Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

In a subclass subl you want to redefine a component of a superclass superl. How do you achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.
A) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in subl. and C) You implement the redefined component in subl.
B) You implement the redefined component for a second time in superl.
D) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in superl.

SAP C_ABAPD_2507 Exam - Topic 1 Question 6 Discussion

Actual exam question for SAP's C_ABAPD_2507 exam
Question #: 6
Topic #: 1
[All C_ABAPD_2507 Questions]

In a subclass subl you want to redefine a component of a superclass superl. How do you achieve this? Note: There are 2 correct answers to this question.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

To redefine a component of a superclass in a subclass, you need to do the following12:

You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component declaration in the subclass. This indicates that the component is inherited from the superclass and needs to be reimplemented in the subclass. The redefinition must happen in the same visibility section as the component declaration in the superclass. For example, if the superclass has a public method m1, the subclass must also declare the redefined method m1 as public with the REDEFINITION clause.

You implement the redefined component in the subclass. This means that you provide the new logic or behavior for the component that is specific to the subclass. The redefined component in the subclass will override the original component in the superclass when the subclass object is used. For example, if the superclass has a method m1 that returns 'Hello', the subclass can redefine the method m1 to return 'Hi' instead.

You cannot do any of the following:

You implement the redefined component for a second time in the superclass. This is not possible, because the superclass already has an implementation for the component that is inherited by the subclass. The subclass is responsible for providing the new implementation for the redefined component, not the superclass.

You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in the superclass. This is not necessary, because the superclass does not need to indicate that the component can be redefined by the subclass. The subclass is the one that needs to indicate that the component is redefined by adding the REDEFINITION clause to the component declaration in the subclass.


by Naomi at Jul 30, 2025, 05:06 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C_ABAPD_2507 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ranee
8 months ago
I thought you had to redefine in both classes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
9 months ago
Adding REDEFINITION in subl is definitely correct!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
9 months ago
You implement the redefined component in subl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
10 months ago
Totally agree with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tandra
10 months ago
Wait, can you really redefine in superl? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynelle
10 months ago
I think we might need to look at both the subclass and superclass for the correct answers, but I can't remember if it's A or D for the REDEFINITION clause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joesph
10 months ago
I feel like option A is definitely wrong because you can't redefine in the subclass like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jovita
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about adding a REDEFINITION clause. Is it in the subclass or superclass?
upvoted 0 times
...
Belen
11 months ago
I think we need to implement the redefined component in the subclass, so maybe option C is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
11 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. The question clearly states we want to redefine a component in the subclass, so the correct answers are A and C. I'm confident in those choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fallon
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about this one. I think the key is using the REDEFINITION clause, but I'm not sure if that goes in the superclass or the subclass. I'll have to review my notes before answering.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
11 months ago
Okay, I've got it! The question says we want to redefine a component in the subclass, so the correct answers must be A and C. I'll select those.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
11 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. I know we need to redefine the component, but I'm not sure if that's done in the superclass or the subclass. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
12 months ago
Hmm, this seems straightforward. I think the key is to redefine the component in the subclass, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
12 months ago
D) sounds like a trap answer. Why would you add the REDEFINITION clause to the superclass? That doesn't make any sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the answer is not B). Implementing the same component twice in the superclass? That's just silly!
upvoted 0 times
Pearlie
8 months ago
Agreed! Redefining is key, not repeating.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
9 months ago
I think A) and C) are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
9 months ago
Right? You can't duplicate components like that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gennie
9 months ago
Definitely not B). That makes no sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lea
1 year ago
A) and C) are the right answers. The subclass should have the REDEFINITION clause and the redefined component.
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
1 year ago
A) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in subl.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Catherin
1 year ago
I believe adding REDEFINITION to the superclass would not achieve the desired result.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlyne
1 year ago
But why not option D? Doesn't adding REDEFINITION to the superclass work too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissia
1 year ago
I agree with Catherin, you need to redefine the component in the subclass.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 year ago
I think the correct answers are A and C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iraida
1 year ago
C) is the correct answer. You have to redefine the component in the subclass subl, not in the superclass superl.
upvoted 0 times
Makeda
1 year ago
A) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in subl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
1 year ago
D) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in superl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
1 year ago
C) You implement the redefined component in subl.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 year ago
A) You add the clause REDEFINITION to the component in subl.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel