Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Exam - Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions]

Sales managers want their team members to help each other close Opportunities. The Opportunity and Account organization-wide defaults are private. To grant Opportunity access tosales reps on the same team, owner ship-based sharing rules were created for each team.

What is the side effect of this approach?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When the organization-wide default for Accounts is private, users can only access the accounts they own or are explicitly shared with them.However, when the organization-wide default for Opportunities is private, users can access the opportunities they own, are explicitly shared with them, or are associated with accounts they can access1. Therefore, when ownership-based sharing rules are created for each team to grant access to opportunities owned by their team members, the sales reps on the same team will also have Read access to the accounts for those opportunities.This is because the sharing rules for opportunities automatically grant access to the parent accounts2.However, the sales reps will not have Edit access to the accounts, unless the sharing rules specify Full Access for the opportunities3. The sales reps will also not have access to all accounts or all opportunities, only those that are owned by their team members or themselves.Reference:Sharing Records Owned by High-Volume Portal Users | Salesforce Security Guide,Sharing Rules | Salesforce Security Guide,Create Owner-Based Sharing Rules | Salesforce Security Guide


by Coral at Aug 16, 2025, 08:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jamie
4 months ago
Really? I didn't expect that kind of access. Sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
4 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but C fits better with the sharing rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tuyet
4 months ago
I think it's C. They get Read access to Accounts for their team’s Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
5 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems like it could be A instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarence
5 months ago
Totally agree, C makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
5 months ago
I think the answer is A because if they have access to Opportunities, it makes sense they would also see the related Accounts, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of these sharing rules. Does it mean all team members can edit Accounts, or just view them?
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
5 months ago
I remember a similar question where we discussed how ownership-based sharing affects access. I feel like the answer might be C, but I could be wrong.
upvoted 0 times
...
Staci
6 months ago
I think the sharing rules might lead to broader access than intended, but I'm not sure if it's all Accounts or just the ones related to Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
6 months ago
I'm a little confused by all the details about the Opportunity and Account organization-wide defaults and the ownership-based sharing rules. I'll need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand what's going on before I select an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
6 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question about access controls. I'm pretty confident I can figure out the right answer here by analyzing the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding that the Opportunity and Account defaults are set to private. So the sharing rules must be granting the sales reps some level of access to the Accounts. I'll evaluate each option carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
6 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the implications of the ownership-based sharing rules. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to figure out the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edward
6 months ago
This seems straightforward - the question is asking about the side effect of the sharing rules set up for the sales team. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what access the sales reps would have based on the information provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
7 months ago
I think the side effect is that sales reps on the same team will have Read access to the Accounts for Opportunities owned by their team members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
7 months ago
Hah, B would be like the sales reps are running a mafia operation, editing each other's Accounts. Definitely C is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
7 months ago
D sounds tempting, but that would be way too open. I'm going with C - it's the most logical option to enable team-based sharing without over-exposing sensitive account data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
7 months ago
I think the correct answer is C. Sharing rules based on ownership will give team members read access to each other's Opportunity Accounts, which makes sense for collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
Tony
3 months ago
Yeah, sharing is essential for closing deals!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pura
3 months ago
C makes sense. Helps everyone stay in the loop.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
4 months ago
Definitely! Sharing access boosts collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lasandra
4 months ago
I agree, C seems right. Teamwork is key!
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel