Sales managers want their team members to help each other close Opportunities. The Opportunity and Account organization-wide defaults are private. To grant Opportunity access tosales reps on the same team, owner ship-based sharing rules were created for each team.
What is the side effect of this approach?
22 comments · newest first
JA
Jamie
10 months ago
Really? I didn't expect that kind of access. Sounds risky!
AL
Alesia
10 months ago
I thought it was B at first, but C fits better with the sharing rules.
TU
Tuyet
10 months ago
I think it's C. They get Read access to Accounts for their team’s Opportunities.
BE
Becky
11 months ago
Wait, are we sure about that? Seems like it could be A instead.
CL
Clarence
11 months ago
Totally agree, C makes the most sense!
NO
Novella
11 months ago
I think the answer is A because if they have access to Opportunities, it makes sense they would also see the related Accounts, right?
MA
Malissa
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the implications of these sharing rules. Does it mean all team members can edit Accounts, or just view them?
GI
Giovanna
12 months ago
I remember a similar question where we discussed how ownership-based sharing affects access. I feel like the answer might be C, but I could be wrong.
ST
Staci
1 year ago
I think the sharing rules might lead to broader access than intended, but I'm not sure if it's all Accounts or just the ones related to Opportunities.
LI
Linsey
1 year ago
I'm a little confused by all the details about the Opportunity and Account organization-wide defaults and the ownership-based sharing rules. I'll need to re-read the question a few times to make sure I understand what's going on before I select an answer.
LE
Leigha
1 year ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward question about access controls. I'm pretty confident I can figure out the right answer here by analyzing the information provided.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
Okay, I think I've got this. The key is understanding that the Opportunity and Account defaults are set to private. So the sharing rules must be granting the sales reps some level of access to the Accounts. I'll evaluate each option carefully.
NA
Nana
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm not totally sure about the implications of the ownership-based sharing rules. I'll need to think it through step-by-step to figure out the right answer.
ED
Edward
1 year ago
This seems straightforward - the question is asking about the side effect of the sharing rules set up for the sales team. I'll carefully read through the options and think about what access the sales reps would have based on the information provided.
AN
Antonio
1 year ago
I think the side effect is that sales reps on the same team will have Read access to the Accounts for Opportunities owned by their team members.
LE
Lettie
1 year ago
Hah, B would be like the sales reps are running a mafia operation, editing each other's Accounts. Definitely C is the way to go here.
GE
Gene
1 year ago
D sounds tempting, but that would be way too open. I'm going with C - it's the most logical option to enable team-based sharing without over-exposing sensitive account data.
MA
Mary
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is C. Sharing rules based on ownership will give team members read access to each other's Opportunity Accounts, which makes sense for collaboration.
TO
Tony
10 months ago
Yeah, sharing is essential for closing deals!
PU
Pura
10 months ago
C makes sense. Helps everyone stay in the loop.
ET
Ettie
11 months ago
Definitely! Sharing access boosts collaboration.
LA
Lasandra
11 months ago
I agree, C seems right. Teamwork is key!