New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Exam - Topic 2 Question 69 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) exam
Question #: 69
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions]

What would it mean for the user when designing perceivable content?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Designing perceivable content means that the content should be presented in a way that can be convertible between different formats, so that users with different sensory abilities can access it. For example, providing text alternatives for images and videos, captions and transcripts for audio, and audio descriptions for visual content. This way, users who are blind, deaf, or have low vision or hearing can perceive the content using assistive technologies, such as screen readers, braille keyboards, or captions. The content should not only be presented in a visual format (A) or an audio format (B), as that would exclude users who cannot see or hear the content.The content should be adaptable to different formats and devices, and follow the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) principle of perceivability12.Reference:

Perceivable - Accessibility | MDN

What Is Perceivability in Web Accessibility? WCAG Principles Explained


by Rosendo at Sep 18, 2024, 09:39 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform User Experience Designer (Plat-UX-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Juliana
3 months ago
I thought it had to be visual only, this is new info!
upvoted 0 times
...
Nenita
3 months ago
Wait, can it really be convertible without losing quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ty
3 months ago
Why not just stick to audio? Visuals are overrated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
4 months ago
Totally agree, C is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
4 months ago
Content should be accessible in multiple formats!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fidelia
4 months ago
I feel like I've seen similar questions before, and they emphasized the importance of having content that everyone can access, which makes me lean towards C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused because I thought perceivable content was just about visual formats, but that doesn't seem inclusive enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
4 months ago
I remember a practice question about accessibility that mentioned presenting content in multiple ways, so I feel like C might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathryn
5 months ago
I think perceivable content means it should be accessible in various formats, but I'm not entirely sure if that's what they mean by "convertible."
upvoted 0 times
...
Marti
5 months ago
Ah, I see what they're getting at now. Perceivable content means it should be presentable in a variety of formats, not just one. That makes sense - accessibility is key when designing content for a wide audience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ling
5 months ago
Option C seems like the best answer here. The content should be designed in a way that allows it to be converted between different formats, so it's accessible to users with different needs or preferences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know accessibility is important, but I'm not sure if the question is asking about that specifically. Maybe I should read through the options again more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magdalene
5 months ago
This question seems straightforward - I think the key is to focus on the concept of "perceivable" content. The options suggest that the content should be accessible in multiple formats, not just visual or audio alone.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
5 months ago
I recall a similar question about the Catalyst series, and I think the 9115 was mentioned then. Maybe that's the answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 year ago
I'm going with C. Convertibility between formats is key for making sure the content is accessible to users with different needs and preferences.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmad
1 year ago
Ha! Designing perceivable content? More like 'designing content that only I can perceive' am I right? Just kidding, I think C is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option A seems a bit too limiting. Wouldn't it be better to have the content in multiple formats for maximum accessibility?
upvoted 0 times
Haley
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, I think having multiple formats available would definitely improve the overall user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jillian
1 year ago
I agree, having the content convertible between formats would make it more inclusive for all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Taryn
1 year ago
I think option C is the best choice. It allows for the content to be accessible in different formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesse
1 year ago
I believe the answer is C) the content should be presented in a way that can be convertible between different formats because it ensures inclusivity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
1 year ago
I agree with Kayleigh, it's important for the content to be accessible to all users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ria
1 year ago
Option B seems like the most logical choice to me. Audio-only content is the best way to ensure the user can perceive the information.
upvoted 0 times
Cristy
1 year ago
I see your point. It's important to consider different user needs when designing perceivable content.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
1 year ago
That's true, having content that can be converted between formats can benefit a wider range of users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dewitt
1 year ago
But what about users who rely on visual content? Option C allows for flexibility in presentation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanda
1 year ago
I think option B is a good choice too. Audio content can be more accessible for some users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kayleigh
1 year ago
I think it means the content should be convertible between different formats.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mohammad
1 year ago
I think option C is the correct answer. The content should be presented in a way that can be converted between different formats to ensure it is accessible to all users.
upvoted 0 times
Willow
1 year ago
Yes, making content convertible between formats is essential for accessibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
1 year ago
I agree, option C is the most inclusive choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel