New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 8
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

At Universal Containers, there's a team of auditors distributed throughout the organization that all need access to high-value opportunities.

With a Private sharing model, which option should an architect recommend when designing a solution for this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Deeanna at Dec 25, 2023, 05:27 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tommy
3 months ago
Option A is the best choice for criteria-based sharing!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
3 months ago
Wait, can auditors really be added to the Opportunity Team?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
3 months ago
Not sure about C, seems like overkill for just access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Idella
4 months ago
Definitely agree with option B, it’s straightforward!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
4 months ago
I think option A makes sense for sharing access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
4 months ago
This question reminds me of a practice scenario we did where sharing rules were crucial. I wonder if the public group option is really the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
4 months ago
I feel like putting auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy might be overkill, but it could solve the access issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
4 months ago
I think adding auditors to the default Opportunity Team could work, but I'm not entirely confident if that would give them the access they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raul
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of sharing rules in a private model, but I'm not sure if a criteria-based rule is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this one. The key is understanding how the Private sharing model works and which option will grant the auditors the necessary access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenise
5 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of sharing models. I'm going to carefully consider each option and choose the one that seems most appropriate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Simona
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a strategy here. Let me walk through the options and see which one best fits the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anglea
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this. I'll need to review the details on criteria-based sharing rules and Opportunity Teams.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elena
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the sharing model options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about IBM Cloud best practices. I'll start by reviewing the key details - the customer wants a highly available, secured virtual server instance-based workload in a Virtual Private Cloud. The options mention the IBM Garage, Architecture Center, Code Camp, and Partner Network, so I'll need to evaluate which of those would be the best place to find an example of this type of environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think it through carefully. Is it possible the answer could be Payable for securities since the proceeds haven't been received yet?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ricki
5 months ago
I feel pretty good about this one. The key is that the question is asking about surveys that measure a single call or incident, not an overall assessment. So I'm going to go with B - Ongoing surveys.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justa
5 months ago
Hmm, the keywords "unconditional, irrevocable, and evergreen clause" make me think it's probably a letter of credit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bambi
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the competitive issues part. Does that mean the committee should consider how the new systems might impact the company's competitive position? I'll have to think that through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
9 months ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Who needs a fancy 'criteria-based sharing rule' when you can just be the boss? Unless, of course, the auditors are also the boss. Then we've got a real power struggle on our hands!
upvoted 0 times
Belen
9 months ago
C is definitely the way to go. It's all about that hierarchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
9 months ago
B) Add the auditors to the default Opportunity Team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
9 months ago
C) Put the auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
9 months ago
You know, if I were an auditor, I'd just hack the system and give myself access. But I guess that's not the kind of 'solution' you're looking for. Anyway, I think A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
9 months ago
Hold up, are we sure C is the right choice? Putting them at the top of the Role Hierarchy could cause some serious organizational headaches. I'd go with A - a criteria-based sharing rule sounds like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
9 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure B is the best option. Putting them in the Role Hierarchy at the top level seems more efficient. C looks like the winner to me.
upvoted 0 times
Man
8 months ago
I see your point. It's important to consider all options and choose the one that best fits the needs of the auditors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anabel
8 months ago
True, A could work too. It really depends on the specific requirements and structure of the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harrison
8 months ago
But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule with a public group also work? A seems like a viable option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
8 months ago
I think C is the best option too. It ensures the auditors have access to all high-value opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryl
10 months ago
But wouldn't adding auditors to the default Opportunity Team provide them with direct access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
10 months ago
I think B is the way to go. Adding the auditors to the Opportunity Team makes the most sense to give them the access they need.
upvoted 0 times
Chun
8 months ago
True, it's important to consider the level of access needed for each user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
9 months ago
I think putting them at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy might be too broad of access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
10 months ago
But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule also work for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
10 months ago
I agree, adding them to the Opportunity Team would be the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgene
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it ensures auditors have access at the highest level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to grant access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
10 months ago
That's a good point, but wouldn't adding them to the default Opportunity Team provide more flexibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go as it ensures the auditors have access at the highest level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
10 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to determine access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel