Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Sharing and Visibility Architect Topic 8 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Sharing and Visibility Architect exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 8
[All Sharing and Visibility Architect Questions]

At Universal Containers, there's a team of auditors distributed throughout the organization that all need access to high-value opportunities.

With a Private sharing model, which option should an architect recommend when designing a solution for this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Johnetta
22 days ago
I'm gonna have to go with C on this one. Who needs a fancy 'criteria-based sharing rule' when you can just be the boss? Unless, of course, the auditors are also the boss. Then we've got a real power struggle on our hands!
upvoted 0 times
Belen
6 days ago
C is definitely the way to go. It's all about that hierarchy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tricia
9 days ago
B) Add the auditors to the default Opportunity Team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teri
12 days ago
C) Put the auditors at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Talia
24 days ago
You know, if I were an auditor, I'd just hack the system and give myself access. But I guess that's not the kind of 'solution' you're looking for. Anyway, I think A is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
25 days ago
Hold up, are we sure C is the right choice? Putting them at the top of the Role Hierarchy could cause some serious organizational headaches. I'd go with A - a criteria-based sharing rule sounds like the cleanest solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonzo
28 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure B is the best option. Putting them in the Role Hierarchy at the top level seems more efficient. C looks like the winner to me.
upvoted 0 times
Youlanda
1 days ago
I think C is the best option too. It ensures the auditors have access to all high-value opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cheryl
2 months ago
But wouldn't adding auditors to the default Opportunity Team provide them with direct access?
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
2 months ago
I think B is the way to go. Adding the auditors to the Opportunity Team makes the most sense to give them the access they need.
upvoted 0 times
True, it's important to consider the level of access needed for each user.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kirby
15 days ago
I think putting them at the highest level of the Role Hierarchy might be too broad of access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
1 months ago
But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule also work for this scenario?
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 months ago
I agree, adding them to the Opportunity Team would be the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Georgene
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is better as it ensures auditors have access at the highest level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to grant access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
2 months ago
That's a good point, but wouldn't adding them to the default Opportunity Team provide more flexibility?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gianna
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the way to go as it ensures the auditors have access at the highest level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it allows for specific criteria to determine access.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel