Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 5 Question 17 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) wants to reduce the amount of redundant leads entered into the system. UC also wants to ensure that leads are only edited/reassigned by the lead owner.Which organization-wide default (OWD) approach should be recommended to help UC implement these requirements?
A) Implement a Public Read Only/Transfer OWD on Lead.
B) Implement 2 Public Read-Only OWD on Lead.
C) Implement a Private OWD on Lead.

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 5 Question 17 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 17
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) wants to reduce the amount of redundant leads entered into the system. UC also wants to ensure that leads are only edited/reassigned by the lead owner.

Which organization-wide default (OWD) approach should be recommended to help UC implement these requirements?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Lashawnda at Mar 30, 2023, 06:15 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Eura
7 months ago
I’m not sure about that, Private OWD might limit collaboration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlene
7 months ago
Public Read Only sounds risky for lead management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
7 months ago
Wait, can leads still be reassigned with Private OWD?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
8 months ago
Totally agree, it keeps things secure!
upvoted 0 times
...
Veronika
8 months ago
I think a Private OWD on Lead makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
8 months ago
I’m a bit confused; would Public Read-Only really help with reducing redundant leads? I thought it might just complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eura
8 months ago
If I recall correctly, a Private OWD would mean only the lead owner can edit, which seems to fit UC's needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
8 months ago
I think we practiced a similar question where Public Read-Only was mentioned, but I can't recall if it allows lead reassignment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denise
8 months ago
I remember discussing how a Private OWD would restrict access, but I'm not sure if it fully prevents redundant leads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mireya
8 months ago
This question seems straightforward. I'm pretty confident that location-related assets are not a common category of intangible assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tesha
8 months ago
All of the options seem plausible to me - a blockchain could potentially store financial data, votes, medical records, and even text-based content. I'll need to draw on my understanding of blockchain principles to determine the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I think the key is to remember the different modeling approaches we covered in class. I'm pretty sure the options are Standard mode and Polygon mode, but I'll double-check to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
8 months ago
I'd say the most fundamental responsibility center affected would be the investment center. With market-based transfer pricing, the divisions have to be more focused on their return on investment to stay competitive with external market prices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
Rotating assignments is a great way to build well-rounded auditors. But I also like the idea of pairing experienced and less experienced auditors for mentoring. That could be really valuable too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm not totally sure about this one. I'll have to think it through carefully. Maybe I should review my notes on supplier relationships first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
1 year ago
If UC wants to reduce redundant leads, they should just tell their sales team to stop hitting the 'Add Lead' button every time they sneeze.
upvoted 0 times
Glory
12 months ago
B) Implement 2 Public Read-Only OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
12 months ago
C) Implement a Private OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwenn
12 months ago
A) Implement a Public Read Only/Transfer OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Youlanda
1 year ago
Definitely going with C. Anything less than a Private OWD would be like leaving the keys in the car and saying 'please don't take it for a joyride'.
upvoted 0 times
Kirk
11 months ago
A) Implement a Public Read Only/Transfer OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
12 months ago
That's a good point. We definitely need to keep those leads secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
12 months ago
C) Implement a Private OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about A. Implementing a Public Read Only/Transfer OWD on Lead might not be enough to prevent redundant data entry. Seems like it would still allow anyone to view and potentially transfer the leads.
upvoted 0 times
Moon
12 months ago
C) Implement a Private OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
1 year ago
B) Implement 2 Public Read-Only OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 year ago
A) Implement a Public Read Only/Transfer OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Timothy
1 year ago
B seems like a good option too. Having 2 Public Read-Only OWD on Lead could also help prevent unnecessary edits, but I'm not sure if it would fully address the requirement of restricting access to the lead owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer. Implementing a Private OWD on Lead will ensure that only the lead owner can edit or reassign the leads, reducing the chances of redundant data entry.
upvoted 0 times
Raylene
11 months ago
No, with 2 Public Read-Only OWD, multiple users can still edit and reassign leads. C is the best option for UC's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
11 months ago
But wouldn't implementing 2 Public Read-Only OWD on Lead also achieve the same result?
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
11 months ago
I agree, implementing a Private OWD on Lead would restrict editing and reassigning to the lead owner.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
12 months ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
12 months ago
It's important for UC to have control over who can edit or reassign leads to avoid any duplicate or incorrect data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathalie
12 months ago
I agree, having a Private OWD on Lead is the best option for UC to maintain data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
1 year ago
Implementing a Private OWD on Lead will ensure that only the lead owner can edit or reassign the leads, reducing the chances of redundant data entry.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
1 year ago
I think C is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Taryn
1 year ago
I'm not sure, but I think option A could also work. Public Read Only/Transfer OWD might restrict unnecessary edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 year ago
I agree with Darrin. With Private OWD, only the lead owner can edit/reassign leads, reducing redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
1 year ago
I think we should go with option C, Private OWD on Lead.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel