New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers has requirement to integrate Salesforce with an external system to control record access.

What option should the Architect consider when designing a solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tamekia at Nov 18, 2024, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elouise
3 months ago
Metadata API doesn’t seem right for access control, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
3 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but not sure if it’s the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
3 months ago
Wait, can you really use the Security API for this? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
4 months ago
Totally agree, SOAP API is solid for SObject_share records!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
4 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for managing access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
4 months ago
Creating Criteria-Based Sharing Rules with the SOAP API seems like a valid approach, but I wonder if it's the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
4 months ago
I feel like the Metadata API is more about deployment rather than record access, so I'm leaning away from option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
4 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because we practiced maintaining SObject_share records with the SOAP API, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
I remember discussing the Security API in class, but I'm not sure if it can actually modify the role hierarchy like option A suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the requirement to control record access, I think the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records is the way to go. That seems like the most direct approach to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
5 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by considering the different APIs mentioned and how they can be used to manage record access. Then I'll evaluate which option best meets the requirement to integrate with an external system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about integrating Salesforce with an external system, so I'll need to review the API options and how they relate to record access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different API options carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
1 year ago
B) is the clear winner here. Maintaining the SObject_share records directly is the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
1 year ago
Let's go with option B) then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
It's definitely the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
1 year ago
Agreed, using the SOAP API to maintain SObject_share records is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
1 year ago
I think B) is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
1 year ago
I agree with Bethanie, option A seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the architect is really wishing they had a time machine to avoid this integration nightmare. But seriously, I think B) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
1 year ago
I'd go with D). Creating new sharing rules seems like the most straightforward solution to control record access between the two systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
1 year ago
B) sounds like the way to go. Modifying the role hierarchy or metadata could have unintended consequences, and creating new sharing rules is overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
1 year ago
D) Creating new sharing rules might be too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
1 year ago
A) Modifying the role hierarchy could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
B) Use the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bethanie
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 year ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel