Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Universal Containers has requirement to integrate Salesforce with an external system to control record access.What option should the Architect consider when designing a solution?
B) Use the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records.
A) Use the Security API to modify the role hierarchy in Salesforce.
C) Use the Metadata API to maintain the related SObject records.
D) Use the SOAP API to create new Criteria-Based Sharing Rules in Salesforce.

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 4 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers has requirement to integrate Salesforce with an external system to control record access.

What option should the Architect consider when designing a solution?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Tamekia at Nov 18, 2024, 04:59 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Elouise
9 months ago
Metadata API doesn’t seem right for access control, just saying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yoko
10 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but not sure if it’s the most efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
10 months ago
Wait, can you really use the Security API for this? Seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
10 months ago
Totally agree, SOAP API is solid for SObject_share records!
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
10 months ago
I think option B is the best choice for managing access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
Creating Criteria-Based Sharing Rules with the SOAP API seems like a valid approach, but I wonder if it's the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bobbie
11 months ago
I feel like the Metadata API is more about deployment rather than record access, so I'm leaning away from option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
11 months ago
I think option B sounds familiar because we practiced maintaining SObject_share records with the SOAP API, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
I remember discussing the Security API in class, but I'm not sure if it can actually modify the role hierarchy like option A suggests.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. Based on the requirement to control record access, I think the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records is the way to go. That seems like the most direct approach to the problem.
upvoted 0 times
...
Holley
11 months ago
Okay, I've got a strategy for this. I'll start by considering the different APIs mentioned and how they can be used to manage record access. Then I'll evaluate which option best meets the requirement to integrate with an external system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The question is asking about integrating Salesforce with an external system, so I'll need to review the API options and how they relate to record access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helene
11 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the different API options carefully to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryanne
2 years ago
B) is the clear winner here. Maintaining the SObject_share records directly is the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
Phil
2 years ago
Let's go with option B) then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 years ago
It's definitely the most targeted approach to the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
2 years ago
Agreed, using the SOAP API to maintain SObject_share records is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 years ago
I think B) is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pete
2 years ago
I agree with Bethanie, option A seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the architect is really wishing they had a time machine to avoid this integration nightmare. But seriously, I think B) is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
2 years ago
I'd go with D). Creating new sharing rules seems like the most straightforward solution to control record access between the two systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iesha
2 years ago
B) sounds like the way to go. Modifying the role hierarchy or metadata could have unintended consequences, and creating new sharing rules is overkill for this use case.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
2 years ago
D) Creating new sharing rules might be too complex.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenifer
2 years ago
A) Modifying the role hierarchy could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 years ago
B) Use the SOAP API to maintain the related SObject_share records.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bethanie
2 years ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more suitable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
2 years ago
I think option D is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel