Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 3 Question 68 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) operates worldwide, with offices in more than 100 regions in 10 different countries, and has established a very complex Role Hierarchy to control data visibility. In the new fiscal year, UC is planning to reorganize the roles and reassign account owners.Which feature should an architect recommend to avoid problems with this operation?
B) Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation
A) Partition data using Divisions
C) Skinny table

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 3 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) operates worldwide, with offices in more than 100 regions in 10 different countries, and has established a very complex Role Hierarchy to control data visibility. In the new fiscal year, UC is planning to reorganize the roles and reassign account owners.

Which feature should an architect recommend to avoid problems with this operation?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Ashley at Nov 21, 2025, 11:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Freida
2 months ago
A could work, but we need to consider future scalability too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
3 months ago
I feel B is crucial. Recalculating rules prevents data access issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ardella
3 months ago
C is not relevant here. Skinny tables are for performance, not visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
3 months ago
A sounds good, but it might complicate things later.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
4 months ago
I disagree, B might be better. Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation ensures smooth transitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
4 months ago
Not sure if Divisions will really solve all the problems though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
4 months ago
Definitely A, it helps with visibility issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alverta
4 months ago
Surprised they didn't mention Skinny tables at all!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tina
4 months ago
I disagree, B) Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation might be better.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
4 months ago
A) Partition data using Divisions is a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
5 months ago
Skinny table? More like a crash diet for my data! Not the solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
5 months ago
If I remember correctly, using Divisions might help with data partitioning, but I’m not entirely sure if it’s the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thomasena
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the skinny table option. I don’t recall how that would apply in this scenario with role changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
5 months ago
I think we practiced a question about sharing rules recalculation, and it seems like that could help avoid issues when changing account owners.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
5 months ago
I remember studying about Role Hierarchies, but I'm not sure how they interact with data visibility during reassignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
5 months ago
I think A is the best choice. Divisions can simplify data management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
6 months ago
Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation? Sounds like a headache waiting to happen. I'd avoid that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pete
6 months ago
Partition data using Divisions seems like the way to go. Keeps things organized and manageable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
6 months ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one. A Skinny table might help simplify the data model, but I'm not sure if that's the right solution for this specific scenario. I'll need to review the details more closely.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuriko
6 months ago
Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation sounds like the way to go here. It should help UC efficiently update the role hierarchy and account ownership without causing major disruptions. I feel pretty confident about this approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Toi
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Partitioning data by Divisions could help manage the data visibility, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach here. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
7 months ago
This sounds like a complex org structure with a lot of moving parts. I'd recommend looking into Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation to help streamline the role reassignment process.
upvoted 0 times
Stefania
2 months ago
Definitely! Keeping data visibility intact is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
2 months ago
They might be, but this seems the most efficient for reassignments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
What about the other options? Are they not useful?
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
2 months ago
I agree, it’s essential for smooth transitions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margery
2 months ago
Sounds like a smart move! Parallel Sharing Rule recalculation could really help.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel