Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 3 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 3

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers' organization wide-defaults model is Private for the Account object. A sales rep owns two opportunities in one Account. The Sales Rep profile has Create/Edit access to opportunity records.

Which level of access will the sales rep have to the related Account record?

ARead access

BRead/Create/Edit access

CNo access

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Dominga at Jul 05, 2024, 04:48 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Yuki

8 months ago

Just Read access makes sense with Private OWD.

upvoted 0 times

...

Christene

8 months ago

Wait, really? No Edit access at all? That seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shelba

8 months ago

I thought they might have more access, but I guess not.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quinn

9 months ago

Totally agree, that's how it works!

upvoted 0 times

...

Andra

9 months ago

The sales rep will have Read access to the Account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Raymon

9 months ago

I think it's B because the sales rep can create and edit opportunities, which might imply some level of access to the Account too. But I could be wrong!

upvoted 0 times

...

Alexia

9 months ago

I'm a bit confused. If the opportunities are private, does that mean the Account is also private for the sales rep? I feel like I need to review this more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Svetlana

9 months ago

I remember a practice question where the access was determined by the ownership of related records. So, I might lean towards option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mohammad

9 months ago

I think the sales rep should have Read access to the Account since they own opportunities related to it, but I'm not entirely sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gianna

9 months ago

Based on the information provided, I believe the sales rep will have Read access to the Account record. The org-wide default is Private, but their access on the related Opportunity should grant them at least Read access on the Account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marcos

9 months ago

Okay, I think I've got this. The sales rep has Create/Edit access on the Opportunity, so that should give them at least Read access on the related Account.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sang

9 months ago

Hmm, this one seems tricky. I'll need to think through the object relationships and access rules carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kelvin

10 months ago

I'm a bit confused. If the org-wide default for Accounts is Private, how does the sales rep's access on Opportunities affect their access to the Account? I'll need to double-check the access rules.

upvoted 0 times

...

Roosevelt

10 months ago

I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check my understanding before selecting an option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lillian

10 months ago

I think this might be more about ensuring compliance with coding standards rather than explaining how the program works, but I'm a bit confused on that part.

upvoted 0 times

...

Noemi

10 months ago

I'm uncertain, but I think configuring the 'ECMP limit' might help in controlling route distribution, though it isn't directly about OMP.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kaitlyn

1 year ago

Haha, this is like a game of tug-of-war between the options. I'm going to go with option B, 'Read/Create/Edit access', just to keep things interesting!

upvoted 0 times

...

Myong

1 year ago

I'm not so sure about that. If the organization-wide defaults are set to Private, the sales rep might not have any access to the Account record at all. I'm leaning towards option C, 'No access'.

upvoted 0 times

Kayleigh

1 year ago

But if the organization-wide defaults are set to Private, the sales rep might not have any access to the Account record at all.

upvoted 0 times

...

Latosha

1 year ago

I agree, the sales rep profile has Create/Edit access to opportunity records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Laurel

1 year ago

I think the sales rep will have Read/Create/Edit access to the related Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johanna

1 year ago

That's a good point, Loreta. The question mentions that the organization-wide defaults for the Account object is set to Private, so the sales rep should have Read access to the related Account record.

upvoted 0 times

Sharita

1 year ago

B) Read/Create/Edit access

upvoted 0 times

...

Carlton

1 year ago

That makes sense, the sales rep should have Read access to the related Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lizette

1 year ago

A) Read access

upvoted 0 times

...

Loreta

1 year ago

Hmm, this seems straightforward. Since the sales rep has Create/Edit access to the Opportunity records, they should have at least Read access to the related Account record, right?

upvoted 0 times

Dorothy

1 year ago

No, the sales rep only has Create/Edit access to the opportunities, so they won't have Create/Edit access to the Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carli

1 year ago

B) Read/Create/Edit access

upvoted 0 times

...

Chan

1 year ago

That's correct. Since the sales rep owns the opportunities, they should have at least Read access to the related Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Juliana

1 year ago

A) Read access

upvoted 0 times

...

Maybelle

1 year ago

I disagree. The sales rep has Create/Edit access to opportunity records, so they should have Read/Create/Edit access to the related Account record as well.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eun

1 year ago

I agree with Jesusa. Since the sales rep owns the opportunities, they should at least have Read access to the Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

1 year ago

I think the sales rep will have Read access to the related Account record.

upvoted 0 times

...