Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Universal Containers wants to store Payment Term Details on the Account object, but the fields should only be visible on certain record types and for certain user profiles.How can a System Administrator quickly determine which user profiles, page layouts, and record types include certain fields?
B) Use the Field Accessibility Viewer for the fields in question
A) Log in as each user profile and view the Account Page Layouts.
C) Universally require the field at the field level.
D) Click the Field-Level Security for the field on each Profile.

Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Exam - Topic 2 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions]

Universal Containers wants to store Payment Term Details on the Account object, but the fields should only be visible on certain record types and for certain user profiles.

How can a System Administrator quickly determine which user profiles, page layouts, and record types include certain fields?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Marguerita at Dec 10, 2022, 02:00 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Sharing and Visibility Architect (Plat-Arch-205) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Karl
7 months ago
A is way too time-consuming, no way that's efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
7 months ago
Wait, can you really see all that info with just B? Sounds too good!
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
7 months ago
I think D could work too, but it’s more manual.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcelle
8 months ago
Totally agree, B makes it super easy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
8 months ago
B is the best option for checking field visibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
8 months ago
I don't think universally requiring the field is a good idea. It doesn't really address the visibility for specific profiles and record types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
8 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage field visibility. I feel like logging in as each user profile would take too long.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dana
8 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about checking Field-Level Security on profiles. That might help too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
8 months ago
I think using the Field Accessibility Viewer could be the quickest way to see which profiles have access to those fields. It seems like a good option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitney
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. The key is ensuring the repository can handle the heavy load from multiple clients accessing it concurrently. Setting up multipathing or deploying a read-only mirror could be good options to consider. I'll make sure to weigh the pros and cons of each before deciding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
8 months ago
I'm pretty confident that option A is the correct answer. Magento uses the catalog_product_save_commit_after event to gather updated IDs and publish them to the Message Queue for later reindexing.
upvoted 0 times
...
An
8 months ago
"fstrim"? I'm not sure about that one. I'll have to review my notes on file system management commands to see if that rings a bell. Hopefully, I can figure this out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
8 months ago
I believe the command is `Enter-UcsSession`, but I might be mixing it up with another command used in different contexts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel