MENU
[Channel Management]
Paul leads an accounting team and is implementing a new expense reporting system.
He wants to update employees on the status of the system's rollout to different offices. He also wants to post links to help articles and online trainings that the team can use as resources. However, he wants to maintain control over the flow of information for these updates and would like to minimize off-topic discussion.
Which of the following would help him achieve his goal?
Suggested Answer: D
Get Premium Salesforce Certified Slack Administrator (Slack-Admn-201) Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
20 comments · newest first
CA
Carole
11 months ago
I disagree with C. Invite-only seems too exclusive.
TE
Terina
11 months ago
D sounds interesting, but will people actually read the announcements?
EL
Eleonore
11 months ago
A public workspace? That sounds chaotic.
MA
Marti
11 months ago
Wait, can we really control off-topic discussions? Sounds tough!
JO
Josephine
11 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. Keeps it focused!
AR
Armanda
12 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the differences between public and private channels. I wonder if option C could be effective in keeping discussions on track?
NA
Nan
12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where the focus was on minimizing off-topic discussions. I think an announce-only channel would really help with that.
RO
Royal
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like a private channel could lead to less distraction. Maybe option B could work too?
DE
Deja
1 year ago
I remember we discussed the importance of controlling information flow in team communications. I think option D might be the best choice for that.
AR
Aron
1 year ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Option B with a private channel sounds good, but I'm wondering if that might limit visibility for the updates and trainings. Maybe Option D with an announce-only channel could work better to get the information out there while still maintaining control.
DA
Dana
1 year ago
Option A seems too open-ended, with a public workspace that could lead to uncontrolled discussion. And Option C with an invite-only workspace might be too restrictive. I think Option B strikes the right balance between accessibility and control.
KA
Kanisha
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards Option D - a public announce-only channel. That way Paul can share the updates and resources without having to worry about off-topic discussion. But I'm not 100% sure if that's the most effective approach.
ET
Ethan
1 year ago
I think the key here is maintaining control over the information flow while still making it accessible to employees. Option B seems like the best choice - a private channel that all employees can access, but where Paul can moderate the discussion.
LE
Lezlie
1 year ago
I agree, D is the best option. Maintaining control over the updates is crucial, and the announce-only feature is perfect for that.
JO
Johnetta
1 year ago
I see both sides, but I think option D would be the most efficient way to control the flow of information while still allowing for updates to be easily accessible.
CO
Cordie
1 year ago
I disagree, I think option A would be more inclusive and allow for open communication among all employees.
VA
Vashti
1 year ago
D is the way to go! An announce-only channel will keep the information flow tidy and prevent distractions.
SA
Sage
1 year ago
B) Create a private channel called #expense-system-updates with all employees added.
TE
Tenesha
1 year ago
A) Create a new public workspace called 'Expenses' with access granted to all employees.
AS
Ashton
1 year ago
I think option B would be best. It keeps the updates private and only includes relevant employees.