Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Exam - Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)
B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment and D) Loss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
C) Product sales may be blocked in Canada

Salesforce Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Exam - Topic 2 Question 45 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) exam
Question #: 45
Topic #: 2
[All Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Questions]

What are two risks in not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases? (2)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

by Kristofer at Jan 23, 2025, 11:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Net Zero Cloud Accredited Professional (AP-218) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Shawana
6 months ago
Loss of contracts? That's a big deal for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dion
6 months ago
Non-reporting companies are just asking for trouble!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
7 months ago
Wait, can companies really get blocked from selling in Canada?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
7 months ago
Totally agree, investors are getting more cautious.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
7 months ago
Customers will definitely pick greener options!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
7 months ago
D sounds familiar from our case studies. Losing contracts over emissions tracking seems plausible, especially with companies focusing on sustainability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hana
8 months ago
I feel like C might be a bit specific, but it could be true for certain markets. I just can't recall if Canada has strict regulations on this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
8 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think customers are becoming more eco-conscious. B could definitely be a risk if they choose greener alternatives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
8 months ago
I remember we discussed how not reporting could make investors nervous about a company's future. So, A seems like a strong option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
8 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this question. The risks of not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases seem clear - things like losing investor trust and customers preferring more environmentally-conscious alternatives. I'll select the two most relevant options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
8 months ago
This is a tricky one. There are a few different angles to consider here, like financial, reputational, and operational risks. I'll need to weigh the options carefully to identify the two most critical risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deeann
8 months ago
Okay, I think I've got a good handle on this. The key risks seem to be around investor and customer perceptions, as well as potential regulatory impacts. I'll make sure to select the two most impactful options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joni
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem to cover a range of potential risks, but I'll need to carefully consider which two are the most relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about the risks of not tracking and reporting greenhouse gases. I'll focus on identifying the two most significant risks from the options provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
Hah, good thing C isn't the answer. Can you imagine a company's products getting blocked in Canada of all places? Talk about a niche risk!
upvoted 0 times
Gaynell
1 year ago
Yeah, that would be a strange reason for products to be blocked in Canada
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
1 year ago
D) Loss of contracts with companies tracking scope 2 emissions
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
1 year ago
B) Customers may choose alternative products that are perceived as better for the environment
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
1 year ago
A) Investors may view non-reporting stocks and companies as riskier
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dick
1 year ago
I agree, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could be a big blow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarett
1 year ago
Customers might go for products that are seen as more environmentally friendly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
1 year ago
This is a no-brainer. A and B are the clear answers here. Ignoring greenhouse gas reporting is just begging for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
1 year ago
Definitely A and B, but I'd also add D. Losing key contracts could be a major issue for companies not tracking emissions.
upvoted 0 times
Harris
1 year ago
We need to start tracking and reporting our greenhouse gases to avoid these risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
1 year ago
True, losing contracts with companies tracking emissions could really hurt our business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 year ago
Customers might go for products that are more environmentally friendly if we don't report our greenhouse gases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
1 year ago
I agree, not tracking emissions can make investors see us as riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
1 year ago
Yeah, investors may see non-reporting companies as riskier investments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
1 year ago
I think not tracking greenhouse gases can be risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 year ago
A and B seem like the most obvious risks. Investors and customers are definitely going to care about environmental impact these days.
upvoted 0 times
Aaron
1 year ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
In
1 year ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel