Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Accredited Agentforce Communications Professional (AP-203) Exam - Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Universal containers (UC) sells bundle of the TV service and VOIP line to its customer UC requires a modem to be one of the technical products as part of the bundle decomposition. UC also requires that when a customer orders as additional VOIP line in the future, it reuses the same modem technical product that was decomposed as part of initial bundle order.
D) Create an M:1 decomposition relationship between TV to Modem and VOIP to Modem and set scope to account on modem technical product
A) Create a 1:1 decomposition relationship between TV and VOIP to modem and set the scope to order item on Modem Technical Product
B) Create a 1:1 decomposition relationship between TV to Modem and VOIP to Modem and decompose conditionally based on whether the modem Is already present in the Technical Inventory
C) Create an M:1 decomposition relationship between TV to Modem and delete the decomposition relationships after the initial bundle order.

Salesforce Accredited Agentforce Communications Professional (AP-203) Exam - Topic 2 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Accredited Agentforce Communications Professional (AP-203) exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Accredited Agentforce Communications Professional (AP-203) Questions]

Universal containers (UC) sells bundle of the TV service and VOIP line to its customer UC requires a modem to be one of the technical products as part of the bundle decomposition. UC also requires that when a customer orders as additional VOIP line in the future, it reuses the same modem technical product that was decomposed as part of initial bundle order.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Torie
3 days ago
C feels like a waste. Why delete relationships?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lindsey
8 days ago
I like D. It covers both services under one account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
13 days ago
Option A seems too rigid. What if the modem breaks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
18 days ago
I agree, B makes sense. Saves resources too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
23 days ago
I think option B is the best. It reuses the modem efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
29 days ago
B is flexible. It adapts to customer needs well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeff
1 month ago
C feels like a waste. Why delete relationships?
upvoted 0 times
...
Remedios
1 month ago
I like D. It covers both services under one account.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nancey
1 month ago
Option A seems too rigid. What if the modem breaks?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
2 months ago
I agree, B makes sense. Saves resources too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
2 months ago
I think option B is the best. It reuses the modem efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
2 months ago
D sounds complicated, not sure if it's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
2 months ago
Totally with you, SmartBuyer! Reusing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassie
2 months ago
Wait, why would we delete relationships in C? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
4 months ago
I think B is better, reusing the modem makes sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
4 months ago
Option A seems straightforward, keeps it simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
5 months ago
Option D seems interesting because it sets the scope to account, which might help with managing multiple orders, but I'm not entirely confident about the implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
5 months ago
I feel like option A is straightforward, but I wonder if it really captures the reuse requirement effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noah
5 months ago
I think option B makes sense since it considers the existing modem in the inventory, but I'm a bit confused about the conditional aspect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leandro
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question about decomposition relationships, but I'm not sure if 1:1 or M:1 is the best fit here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel