Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Salesforce Communications Cloud Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Communications Cloud exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions]

UC rolling out new offer, which must be fulfilled using industries order management. Orchestration must integrate with the provisioning system, which accepts a different payload for activating the service

What is the recommendation approach for designing the orchestration while minimizing unnecessary configurations?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, D

by Tennie at Jun 22, 2024, 12:40 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Communications Cloud Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Chaya
28 days ago
Wait, we have to integrate with a provisioning system that accepts a 'different payload'? Sounds like somebody's been playing a little too much Tetris with their data models!
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
29 days ago
Wow, orchestration configurations sure can get complicated. I'm just going to go with the answer that includes the word 'minimize' – can't go wrong with that!
upvoted 0 times
Lezlie
11 days ago
A) Create two orchestration plan, one having the activation Orchestration item and other with the deactivation. Configure one scenario to map activation to Add action and deactivation to disconnect action
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jonelle
1 months ago
Option D sounds like a lot of unnecessary overhead. Why create two separate plans when we can do it all in one? I'm with Alline on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Becky
7 days ago
I agree, having one orchestration plan with two definitions seems like the most efficient approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
11 days ago
Option D sounds like a lot of unnecessary overhead. Why create two separate plans when we can do it all in one? I'm with Alline on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I like the idea of using a single orchestration plan with two definitions, but I'm not sure about the 'mutually exclusive condition' part. Wouldn't it be better to have one definition for activation and one for deactivation?
upvoted 0 times
Desiree
16 days ago
I think having two definitions with mutually exclusive conditions would ensure that only one action is taken at a time, minimizing unnecessary configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
26 days ago
C) Create one orchestration plan definition with two orchestration definition having mutually exclusive condition. Configure the scenario to include both Add and disconnect actions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Veta
1 months ago
A) Create two orchestration plan, one having the activation Orchestration item and other with the deactivation. Configure one scenario to map activation to Add action and deactivation to disconnect action
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alline
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most elegant solution. Minimizing the number of orchestration plans is key, and having a single plan with two definitions covers both activation and deactivation.
upvoted 0 times
Stevie
28 days ago
It's a smart way to design the orchestration while ensuring efficient fulfillment of the new offer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
29 days ago
Definitely, it streamlines the configuration and makes it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jackie
1 months ago
I agree, having one plan with mutually exclusive conditions simplifies the orchestration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
Option C seems like the most elegant solution. Minimizing the number of orchestration plans is key, and having a single plan with two definitions covers both activation and deactivation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Odette
2 months ago
I prefer option A, where we map activation to Add action and deactivation to disconnect action. It seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
2 months ago
I agree with Eugene. It would be more organized and easier to manage that way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
2 months ago
I think the recommendation approach should be to create two orchestration plans, one for activation and one for deactivation.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel