Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Exam - Topic 11 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) exam
Question #: 78
Topic #: 11
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions]

Consider the following code snippet:

The Apex method is executed in an environment with a large data volume count for Accounts, and the query is performing poorly.

Which technique should the developer implement to ensure the query performs optimally, while preserving the entire result set?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Fatima at Oct 06, 2023, 05:43 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Developer II (Plat-Dev-301) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ranee
4 months ago
Definitely leaning towards A for optimal results!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
4 months ago
Formula fields (Option D) can help with performance too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
Surprised that @Future (Option C) is even an option here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
4 months ago
I disagree, breaking it down (Option B) could be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
5 months ago
Option A is the best choice for large data volumes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
5 months ago
Creating a formula field sounds familiar, but I can't quite remember how that would optimize the query in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
5 months ago
The @Future annotation seems like it could help with processing time, but I don't recall if it actually affects query performance directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
5 months ago
I remember a practice question where breaking down queries improved performance, but I wonder if it would still preserve the entire result set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickolas
5 months ago
I think using the Database.queryLocation method could help with performance, but I'm not entirely sure how it works in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ira
5 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the Database.queryLocation method is the way to go to ensure optimal performance while keeping the full result set.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nell
5 months ago
I've seen similar issues before. I think breaking down the query into two separate queries and joining the results could be a good approach to improve performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the question. I'm not sure which technique would be the best to use here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ines
5 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'll need to think carefully about the options and how they might impact the query performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rickie
6 months ago
Okay, let me see. I think the key is to find a way to optimize the query while still preserving the entire result set. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused on the difference between the NFS and CIFS options. Do I need to focus on the protocol or the user name format?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bo
6 months ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. The bounded context is a key concept in microservices architecture, so I'm going with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Virgie
6 months ago
I think I've got a handle on this. Based on the options, it seems like line 9 is adding the `resolved` property to the `supportTicket` object. I'll double-check my understanding, but I'm feeling pretty confident about this one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel