Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 8 Question 38 Discussion

A nonprofit created a custom Opportunity Name for all In-kind gifts.Which two considerations should the consultant discuss with the nonprofit?Choose 2 answers
A) The nonprofit should change existing Opportunities to the new naming convention by running the Refresh All Opportunity Names utility. and B) The Opportunity Name Format will only be applied to new Opportunities of the matching record type,
C) The nonprofit should change existing Opportunities to the new naming convention through an upsert.
D) Click the Refresh Name button on one Opportunity record to update all relevant Opportunities.

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 8 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 8
[All Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions]

A nonprofit created a custom Opportunity Name for all In-kind gifts.

Which two considerations should the consultant discuss with the nonprofit?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B

https://powerofus.force.com/s/article/NPSP-Customize-Opportunity-Names#refreshsingle


by Aja at May 07, 2022, 04:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Burma
7 months ago
I disagree with C, upserting could cause issues with data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phil
7 months ago
Option A makes sense, but what about the old records?
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
7 months ago
Wait, can you really just click a button for all? Sounds too easy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eladia
8 months ago
Agree, changing existing names seems like a hassle!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
8 months ago
I think option B is definitely a key point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
8 months ago
I vaguely remember that clicking the Refresh Name button only updates one record at a time, which seems inefficient for a nonprofit with many Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
8 months ago
I feel like we talked about using an upsert for existing Opportunities, but I wonder if that's the best method compared to the Refresh Name button.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
8 months ago
I think we practiced a question about updating Opportunity Names, but I can't recall if the Refresh All Opportunity Names utility was the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
8 months ago
I remember discussing how the Opportunity Name Format only applies to new Opportunities, but I'm not sure if that means we should change existing ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrine
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I remember learning about the Actuator, but I can't recall all the details about the info endpoint. I'll need to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
8 months ago
I remember discussing how shared identity management could lead to tighter coupling between services, which might relate to this question.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel