Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion

A nonprofit has a large volume of contacts, accounts, and address records and wants to migrate all of its data into NPSP.What are two considerations?Choose 2 answers
A) Managing multiple addresses introduces more complexity. and C) The default address is updated on a nightly basis.
B) Three addresses per contact or organization can be migrated into NPSP.
D) Address records consume additional data storage.

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 7 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions]

A nonprofit has a large volume of contacts, accounts, and address records and wants to migrate all of its data into NPSP.

What are two considerations?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

by Estrella at May 09, 2022, 07:25 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Cordelia
7 months ago
Not sure about that nightly update thing... sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
7 months ago
The default address update is a game changer!
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
7 months ago
Wait, three addresses per contact? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Julene
8 months ago
I agree, especially with large datasets!
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
8 months ago
Managing multiple addresses introduces more complexity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maybelle
8 months ago
I don’t think the default address updates nightly, but I could be mixing that up with another system. I’m leaning towards A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Macy
8 months ago
I vaguely recall that address records can take up a lot of space, so option D could definitely be a consideration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
8 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I feel like there was a limit on how many addresses could be migrated. Maybe option B is correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Basilia
8 months ago
I remember something about managing multiple addresses being tricky, so I think option A might be one of the considerations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
8 months ago
This seems like a pretty straightforward process design question. I think I'd start by mapping out the key requirements - the 30-minute review time limit, the need to save draft reviews, and the requirement to notify a supervisor if a review is missed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
8 months ago
Wait, doesn't a fraud report need to be objective? Option A sounds wrong because it mentions subjective perspective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
8 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of JPA annotations. I'll need to draw on my knowledge of @IdClass, @Embeddable, and @EmbeddedId to determine the right solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
8 months ago
I'm a little confused by the wording of the question. Is it asking about the best way to communicate IT governance, or the best thing to communicate? I'll need to re-read it carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
8 months ago
Okay, let's see. We need to find the data source that would give us IP addresses and the ability to map those to locations. I'm thinking option A or D might be the best choices here.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel