New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 4 Question 58 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) exam
Question #: 58
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions]

A consultant has installed NPSP and is setting up Relationships using List Settings. The nonprofit wants the reciprocal relationship to be selected automatically based on gender.

On which object should the consultant create the custom "Gender" field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

https://powerofus.force.com/s/article/NPSP-Manage-Relationships-Settings


by Renea at Jul 30, 2022, 03:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Ivan
4 months ago
I didn't know gender could influence relationships like that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Art
4 months ago
Really? I thought gender fields were usually on Accounts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
4 months ago
Wait, why not use the Relationship object? Seems like a better fit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
4 months ago
I agree, Contact makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
4 months ago
Definitely needs to be on the Contact object.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
5 months ago
I’m a bit confused; I thought the Relationship object might be the right choice since it deals with connections between people.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the Contact object makes the most sense for personal attributes like gender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Victor
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about relationships being tied to Affiliations. Could it be there?
upvoted 0 times
...
Julianna
5 months ago
I think the "Gender" field should be on the Contact object since it relates to individual people.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
5 months ago
I thought the custom field should be on the Affiliation object, but now I'm questioning if that makes sense for gender.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dyan
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question, and I feel like the Relationship object might be the right choice for this, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elsa
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about relationships being tied to Accounts. Could it be on the Account object?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
I think the "Gender" field should be on the Contact object since it relates to individual people.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. Based on the options provided, "Fidelity insurance" seems like the most relevant choice. That type of policy is designed to protect against losses from employee dishonesty and fraud, so it should help the organization recover those losses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
Easy peasy! Bubba paid a net premium of $4, and the difference between the two strike prices is $10. So the stock price needs to be at $57 for Bubba to break even.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards option B - discussing changes in demand for end items seems like a key part of the pre-sales and operations planning process. But I'll double-check the other options to make sure I'm not missing anything.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
5 months ago
The active/standby pool member setup sounds like it could be the culprit. I'll need to verify the health monitoring and failover settings to see if that's causing the intermittent issues.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel