Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

A nonprofit organization created a custom Opportunity name for all organization donations.Which two considerations should the consultant discuss with the organization? Choose 2 answers
B) The organization should only change existing Opportunities to the new naming convention by using the 'Refresh Name' action. and C) The organization should change existing Opportunities to the new naming convention by using the 'Refresh All Opportunity Names' button in Bulk Data Processes.
A) The organization should change existing Opportunities to the new naming convention through an upsert.
D) The custom naming convention only applies to new Opportunities of matching record types; it is not retroactive.

Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Exam - Topic 4 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) exam
Question #: 31
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions]

A nonprofit organization created a custom Opportunity name for all organization donations.

Which two considerations should the consultant discuss with the organization? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

by Rasheeda at May 05, 2022, 07:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Nonprofit Cloud Consultant (NP-Con-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Joanne
7 months ago
B seems too limited; they should consider all options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesus
7 months ago
A and C could cause confusion with existing records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
7 months ago
Wait, so the naming convention isn't retroactive? That's surprising!
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
8 months ago
Totally agree, D makes the most sense!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
8 months ago
I think option D is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominque
8 months ago
I definitely remember that there was a Bulk Data Processes option, but I'm uncertain if it's the right choice for updating existing Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Svetlana
8 months ago
I feel like the custom naming convention is only for new Opportunities, but I can't remember if it applies retroactively or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
8 months ago
I think the 'Refresh Name' action was mentioned in a practice question, but I can't recall if it's the best option for existing Opportunities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
8 months ago
I remember discussing how changing existing Opportunities might affect historical data, but I'm not sure if we should use an upsert or another method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odelia
8 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question about data retention policies. I'll start by considering the legal requirements, as that's usually the first thing to address.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
8 months ago
Okay, let's see here. I know deadlocks can happen when two transactions are waiting for each other's resources. I'll need to figure out the best way for SCOTT's session to move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tatum
8 months ago
This looks straightforward. The policy on PE1 maps dot1p 4 to EXP 5, so the packets arriving at PE2 should have an EXP value of 5.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel