Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MKT-101 exam

Question #: 47
Topic #: 2

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) is the holding company of three subsidiaries: Universal Containers, Ursa Major Solar, and Cloud Kicks. NTO recently purchased Marketing Cloud and has asked its consultant to recommend a scalable business unit (BU) hierarchy. They don't plan on executing any marketing campaigns on behalf of the NTO holding company, but NTO employees would like access to all subscribers and aggregate reporting. Additionally, each subsidiary business will be regularly running campaigns and should have their own branding, content, and subscribers.

Which solution should the consultant recommend?

AOne parent BU and two child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages.

BOne parent BU with three additional private domains.

COne parent BU and one child BU

DOne parent BU and three child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Jodi at May 29, 2024, 02:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MKT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Skye

3 months ago

Option B could work too, but I like D better for flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Muriel

3 months ago

Not sure if they really need separate Sender Authentication Packages for each BU.

upvoted 0 times

...

Malcom

3 months ago

Wait, why not just go with option A? Seems simpler.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

4 months ago

Definitely agree, each subsidiary needs its own branding!

upvoted 0 times

...

Winfred

4 months ago

I think option D makes the most sense for their needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

4 months ago

I feel like option D is the best choice since it allows for individual Sender Authentication Packages, which is crucial for their campaigns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Luann

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to consider access to subscribers and reporting, and I think option A might not provide enough separation for each subsidiary.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bette

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think having a single parent BU with multiple private domains could limit the branding flexibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Antonio

5 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of having separate branding for each subsidiary, so I think option D makes sense with three child BUs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kanisha

5 months ago

This seems like a classic case of balancing the needs of the parent company with the autonomy of the subsidiaries. I'm leaning towards option D, but I'll double-check the details to be sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Skye

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused by the mention of Sender Authentication Packages. I'll need to review that concept to make sure I understand how it applies in this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelina

5 months ago

Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to set up the BU hierarchy in a way that gives each subsidiary their own identity and control, while still allowing NTO to access the overall reporting.

upvoted 0 times

...

Vanesa

5 months ago

Hmm, the details about the subsidiaries and their needs for branding and campaigns are important here. I'll need to carefully consider how each option addresses those requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chauncey

5 months ago

This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before selecting an answer.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leota

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of GRE. I'll need to think through each option carefully to determine which one is false.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaunda

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the DHCP scope mapping and how that relates to the fabric edge nodes. I'll need to review that part carefully.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joanna

5 months ago

This seems pretty straightforward. I think option C is the way to go - just install the Stackdriver Error Reporting library and run the code on App Engine.

upvoted 0 times

...

Monroe

5 months ago

This looks like a pretty straightforward question about web service security standards. I think the key is to identify the standard that allows for centralized policy enforcement across multiple services.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dorothy

5 months ago

This seems straightforward to me. If the CPUs are the bottleneck, then the solution is to get faster CPUs, so I'm going with option A.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lemuel

10 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Gotta keep those subsidiaries feeling independent, you know? Like a mom letting her kids have their own social media accounts.

upvoted 0 times

Jose

8 months ago

I think Option D will provide the independence and control that each subsidiary needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lettie

8 months ago

Agreed, it's important for each business unit to have their own branding and subscribers.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

9 months ago

Option D is definitely the best choice. Each subsidiary needs to maintain their own identity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paris

10 months ago

Option A is an interesting approach, but I'm not sure why we'd need two child BUs. Seems a bit overkill for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

Rebbecca

9 months ago

I think Option A is the most practical choice in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ammie

9 months ago

I agree, Option A seems like a good fit for what we're looking for.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elouise

10 months ago

Option A sounds like it could work well for our needs.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gerri

10 months ago

Option C is just not robust enough. Having only one child BU won't give the subsidiaries the autonomy they need to run their own campaigns effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lashaun

10 months ago

I'm leaning towards Option B. Setting up three private domains under the parent BU seems like a simpler way to achieve the same result, without the extra complexity of separate child BUs.

upvoted 0 times

Joseph

9 months ago

That's true, but it might also add unnecessary complexity to the setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larae

9 months ago

But wouldn't having separate child BUs provide more autonomy for each subsidiary?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carissa

9 months ago

I agree, having three private domains under one parent BU seems efficient.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lyla

10 months ago

Option B sounds like a good choice. It would keep things streamlined.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rex

10 months ago

Why do you think option A is better?

upvoted 0 times

...

Allene

10 months ago

Option D seems like the best solution. Having a parent BU and three child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages allows for the desired branding, content, and subscribers for each subsidiary, while still providing NTO employees access to aggregate reporting.

upvoted 0 times