Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) is the holding company of three subsidiaries: Universal Containers, Ursa Major Solar, and Cloud Kicks. NTO recently purchased Marketing Cloud and has asked its consultant to recommend a scalable business unit (BU) hierarchy. They don't plan on executing any marketing campaigns on behalf of the NTO holding company, but NTO employees would like access to all subscribers and aggregate reporting. Additionally, each subsidiary business will be regularly running campaigns and should have their own branding, content, and subscribers.Which solution should the consultant recommend?
B) One parent BU with three additional private domains.
A) One parent BU and two child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages.
C) One parent BU and one child BU
D) One parent BU and three child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages.

Salesforce MKT-101 Exam - Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's MKT-101 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All MKT-101 Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) is the holding company of three subsidiaries: Universal Containers, Ursa Major Solar, and Cloud Kicks. NTO recently purchased Marketing Cloud and has asked its consultant to recommend a scalable business unit (BU) hierarchy. They don't plan on executing any marketing campaigns on behalf of the NTO holding company, but NTO employees would like access to all subscribers and aggregate reporting. Additionally, each subsidiary business will be regularly running campaigns and should have their own branding, content, and subscribers.

Which solution should the consultant recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Jodi at May 29, 2024, 02:21 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium MKT-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Skye
8 months ago
Option B could work too, but I like D better for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Muriel
8 months ago
Not sure if they really need separate Sender Authentication Packages for each BU.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcom
8 months ago
Wait, why not just go with option A? Seems simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
9 months ago
Definitely agree, each subsidiary needs its own branding!
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
9 months ago
I think option D makes the most sense for their needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
9 months ago
I feel like option D is the best choice since it allows for individual Sender Authentication Packages, which is crucial for their campaigns.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luann
9 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider access to subscribers and reporting, and I think option A might not provide enough separation for each subsidiary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bette
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think having a single parent BU with multiple private domains could limit the branding flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
9 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of having separate branding for each subsidiary, so I think option D makes sense with three child BUs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
9 months ago
This seems like a classic case of balancing the needs of the parent company with the autonomy of the subsidiaries. I'm leaning towards option D, but I'll double-check the details to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
9 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the mention of Sender Authentication Packages. I'll need to review that concept to make sure I understand how it applies in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelina
9 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The key is to set up the BU hierarchy in a way that gives each subsidiary their own identity and control, while still allowing NTO to access the overall reporting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
9 months ago
Hmm, the details about the subsidiaries and their needs for branding and campaigns are important here. I'll need to carefully consider how each option addresses those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
10 months ago
This question seems straightforward, but I want to make sure I understand the requirements correctly before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the details of GRE. I'll need to think through each option carefully to determine which one is false.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
10 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused on the DHCP scope mapping and how that relates to the fabric edge nodes. I'll need to review that part carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joanna
10 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think option C is the way to go - just install the Stackdriver Error Reporting library and run the code on App Engine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Monroe
10 months ago
This looks like a pretty straightforward question about web service security standards. I think the key is to identify the standard that allows for centralized policy enforcement across multiple services.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorothy
10 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. If the CPUs are the bottleneck, then the solution is to get faster CPUs, so I'm going with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
1 year ago
Option D is the way to go. Gotta keep those subsidiaries feeling independent, you know? Like a mom letting her kids have their own social media accounts.
upvoted 0 times
Jose
1 year ago
I think Option D will provide the independence and control that each subsidiary needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
1 year ago
Agreed, it's important for each business unit to have their own branding and subscribers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
1 year ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. Each subsidiary needs to maintain their own identity.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 year ago
Option A is an interesting approach, but I'm not sure why we'd need two child BUs. Seems a bit overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
Rebbecca
1 year ago
I think Option A is the most practical choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
1 year ago
I agree, Option A seems like a good fit for what we're looking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elouise
1 year ago
Option A sounds like it could work well for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gerri
1 year ago
Option C is just not robust enough. Having only one child BU won't give the subsidiaries the autonomy they need to run their own campaigns effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaun
1 year ago
I'm leaning towards Option B. Setting up three private domains under the parent BU seems like a simpler way to achieve the same result, without the extra complexity of separate child BUs.
upvoted 0 times
Joseph
1 year ago
That's true, but it might also add unnecessary complexity to the setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Larae
1 year ago
But wouldn't having separate child BUs provide more autonomy for each subsidiary?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
1 year ago
I agree, having three private domains under one parent BU seems efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyla
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a good choice. It would keep things streamlined.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rex
1 year ago
Why do you think option A is better?
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 year ago
Option D seems like the best solution. Having a parent BU and three child BUs with their own Sender Authentication Packages allows for the desired branding, content, and subscribers for each subsidiary, while still providing NTO employees access to aggregate reporting.
upvoted 0 times
Ozell
1 year ago
I agree, it provides the right balance of control and access for all parties involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
1 year ago
Option D seems like the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ceola
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rex
1 year ago
I think the consultant should recommend option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel