Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Exam - Topic 7 Question 77 Discussion

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) Is a global brand which Includes many subsidiary brands under the parent umbrella. NTO is the Enterprise business unit and also has a child business unit used for sending promotional email.How should the rest of the business units be organized?
B) Create and apply folders with naming conventions in the current account to keep track of brand assets.
A) Create child business units for each brand and nest another level of child business units for GEOs.
C) Create new Enterprise business units for each brand and child business units for each of the brand's GEOs.
D) Create one child business unit for the other brands to share but apply folders and naming conventions.

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Exam - Topic 7 Question 77 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) exam
Question #: 77
Topic #: 7
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) Is a global brand which Includes many subsidiary brands under the parent umbrell

a. NTO is the Enterprise business unit and also has a child business unit used for sending promotional email.

How should the rest of the business units be organized?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Estrella at Oct 08, 2023, 04:52 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Refugia
6 months ago
C could lead to too many layers, not sure it's efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonda
6 months ago
Wait, are we really considering D? That sounds risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cordelia
7 months ago
B seems too simple for such a big brand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
Totally agree, A is the way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
7 months ago
I think option A makes the most sense for organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tequila
7 months ago
Option D seems like a compromise, but I'm not convinced that sharing one child business unit would work well for all brands. It feels risky to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
8 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C since having separate Enterprise business units could provide better control, but it feels like it might complicate things too much.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anjelica
8 months ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I think creating folders as in option B could help with asset management, but it might not be enough for larger brands.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
8 months ago
I think option A makes sense because it allows for clear organization by brand and geography, but I'm not entirely sure if that's the most efficient way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
8 months ago
This seems straightforward to me. I'd go with option C and create new Enterprise business units for each brand, with child business units for the GEOs. That way everything is clearly organized by brand and location.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lazaro
8 months ago
I've got a strategy in mind - I think creating child business units for each brand and then nesting GEO-level child units could be the most comprehensive and scalable approach. But I'll double-check the other options just to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lou
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through step-by-step. The key seems to be how to structure the other business units under the NTO parent brand. I'll need to weigh the pros and cons of each option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky organizational question. I'll need to carefully consider the hierarchy and structure of the business units to determine the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the wording of the question. Can the other business units be organized in multiple ways, or is there a single best solution? I'll need to read through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
8 months ago
Okay, let me read through this slowly and make sure I understand all the options before selecting my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Corazon
8 months ago
This seems like a tricky situation with the stakeholders being in different time zones. I think email might be the best option to get their feedback, since it's asynchronous and they can review the document on their own time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chantell
1 year ago
Ha! Folders and naming conventions? What is this, the early 2000s? C is clearly the superior choice here. Gotta love that enterprise-level organization.
upvoted 0 times
Kendra
11 months ago
I think D could work if the brands are willing to share resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irma
11 months ago
True, but having separate business units for each brand could streamline operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
11 months ago
But wouldn't creating child business units for each brand be too complex?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
12 months ago
I agree, C seems like the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mariko
1 year ago
D is the way to go! One shared child business unit for the other brands? Genius! And the folders and naming conventions will help keep everything tidy.
upvoted 0 times
Alica
11 months ago
It's a smart way to keep everything organized and easily accessible for all the brands involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
12 months ago
I agree, having folders and naming conventions will make it easier to manage all the brand assets within that shared child business unit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paola
12 months ago
D is definitely the most efficient option. Sharing one child business unit for multiple brands will streamline operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tijuana
1 year ago
Option A seems a bit overkill with all those nested child business units. I'd go with C - it keeps things streamlined while still allowing for proper brand management.
upvoted 0 times
Reuben
12 months ago
I see your point, but I still think option A might provide the most detailed organization for each brand.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bea
12 months ago
I think option D could work too, as long as the folders and naming conventions are well-maintained.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tu
12 months ago
I agree, option C sounds like the most efficient way to organize the business units.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rochell
1 year ago
Hmm, I think option C makes the most sense. Creating separate Enterprise business units for each brand and then child business units for their respective GEOs seems like the most organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
Mabel
12 months ago
That could work too, as long as there are clear folders and naming conventions in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
12 months ago
But wouldn't it be more efficient to have one child business unit for the other brands to share?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 year ago
I agree, having separate Enterprise business units for each brand will make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phung
1 year ago
I prefer option B, creating and applying folders with naming conventions to keep track of brand assets.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aaron
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe we should create new Enterprise business units for each brand and child business units for each GEO.
upvoted 0 times
...
Estrella
1 year ago
I think we should create child business units for each brand and nest another level for GEOs.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel