New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Engagement Administrator (MCE-Admn-201) Questions]

To prevent retention of stagnant data, Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants any

inactive data stored in data extensions to be cleared after 12 months.

What action should NTO take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Andrew
4 months ago
Totally agree with A, it’s straightforward and effective!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
4 months ago
Wait, can we really recover data after it's cleared?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lemuel
4 months ago
D sounds like a lot of extra work for each data extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
4 months ago
I think B might be better for the whole enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimbery
4 months ago
A is the way to go for a simple solution!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yong
5 months ago
I feel like option B is too broad since it applies to the entire enterprise, and NTO seems to want something more specific for their data extensions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deandrea
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused about option C; it mentions recoverable data, but I'm not sure if that's what NTO really needs for inactive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
5 months ago
I remember practicing a similar question, and I think option D could also be valid because it allows for specific retention settings per data extension.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
5 months ago
I think option A might be the right choice since it mentions configuring the business unit data retention setting, but I'm not entirely sure how that works in practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delila
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is it really an accrued expense, or could it be something else like accounts payable? I'll need to think through the definitions of those concepts carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little confused. I was thinking B - "Show only on 2" might work, but now I'm not so sure. I'll have to re-read the question carefully and think it through step-by-step to make sure I get the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ryan
5 months ago
I've got a good feeling about this one. The options cover a range of system files and components, so I think I can narrow it down to the four that best fit the "Domain Template" description.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolland
5 months ago
I just can't recall if upgrading is the only way to change an instance's configuration. Maybe downgrading is also correct?
upvoted 0 times
...
Katlyn
5 months ago
Okay, I think I've got this. I'll start by calculating the total available machine hours per week, then adjust that based on the utilization and efficiency percentages to get the rated capacity. Should be a pretty simple calculation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
5 months ago
The node is marked as disabled? That's an interesting possibility. I'll need to double-check the exhibit to see if there's any indication of that.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel