Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant Questions]

You decide to build an automation rule to automatically allow prospects to match the "Title" criteria in your grade profile. You need to capture all prospects with any form of Vice President in their job title but want to exclude ones who are currently on any of your suppression lists. Which of the following sets of rule criteria will accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Delisa at Apr 11, 2024, 02:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Rachael
1 months ago
Wait, you guys are actually taking this exam seriously? I thought this was just a friendly game of 'Guess the Automation Rule'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
1 months ago
Option B, really? 'Is' Vice President? What, are we only targeting people with the exact job title 'Vice President'? Seems a bit too specific.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
1 months ago
Option D is my pick. 'Contains' is a more forgiving match than 'Is' for job titles, in case there's any variation in how they're written.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
9 days ago
Yeah, option D with 'Contains' for job titles is the most inclusive choice. It's important to account for any variations in titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
12 days ago
I agree, 'Contains' will capture more variations in job titles compared to 'Is'. Option D seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
26 days ago
I think option D is the best choice too. 'Contains' is more flexible for matching job titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Splitting it into two rule groups seems more flexible, in case we need to add more criteria later.
upvoted 0 times
Long
3 days ago
Option C does seem like the most logical choice for this automation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
28 days ago
I agree, having separate rule groups can make it easier to manage and update criteria in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
1 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice. It allows for more flexibility with the two rule groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
2 months ago
Option A looks good to me. Matching all prospects not on the suppression list and with 'Vice President' or 'VP' in their title seems straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
2 days ago
I agree, option A seems to be the most accurate and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
13 days ago
That sounds like the right choice. It covers all the criteria we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
15 days ago
A) Match ALL overall logiC. Prospect List > Isn't > suppression List A; B; C; D Prospect default field > Title > contains > Vice President; VP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I can see how option C would work effectively in capturing the prospects we need without including those on the suppression list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the right choice. It allows for matching any job title containing Vice President while also excluding prospects on the suppression list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is option A because it specifies to exclude prospects on the suppression list and match any job title containing Vice President.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel