Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant (MCAE-Con-201) Exam - Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant (MCAE-Con-201) exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant (MCAE-Con-201) Questions]

You decide to build an automation rule to automatically allow prospects to match the "Title" criteria in your grade profile. You need to capture all prospects with any form of Vice President in their job title but want to exclude ones who are currently on any of your suppression lists. Which of the following sets of rule criteria will accomplish this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Delisa at Apr 11, 2024, 02:07 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Marketing Cloud Account Engagement Consultant (MCAE-Con-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Teri
5 months ago
Wait, can we really exclude all those suppression lists with just one rule?
upvoted 0 times
...
Merri
5 months ago
D is too broad, could let in unwanted titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
5 months ago
C looks good, but why use "Match ANY"? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francine
5 months ago
I think B is too strict, it won't catch variations like "VP of Sales."
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
6 months ago
Option A seems right, captures all VPs and excludes suppressions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
6 months ago
I thought "contains" was more flexible, but I can't recall if it works for excluding suppression lists. Maybe option D is too broad?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carla
6 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the logic types. Shouldn't we be using "Match ALL" to ensure both conditions are met?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristy
6 months ago
I think option C might be the best choice since it uses "Match ANY" and captures both the suppression lists and the title criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
6 months ago
I remember we practiced similar questions about filtering prospects, but I'm not sure if "contains" is the right operator for this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
6 months ago
This is a good test of my understanding of automation rules. I'll walk through each option step-by-step to make sure I'm selecting the most accurate one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
6 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. Option D looks like the right choice - it matches any prospects with "Vice President" or "VP" in the title, while excluding any on the suppression lists.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marjory
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused by the "Match ALL" and "Match ANY" options. I'll need to make sure I understand the difference before selecting an answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
6 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the options and think through the logic.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
7 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The criteria in option D seem to cover the requirements perfectly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward project management question. I'll review the options carefully and think through the types of changes that would require a formal change request.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. Option A mentions the main stages - initiating the review, data collection, analysis, and making/implementing recommendations. That seems like the most comprehensive answer. I'll select that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
11 months ago
Wait, you guys are actually taking this exam seriously? I thought this was just a friendly game of 'Guess the Automation Rule'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
11 months ago
Option B, really? 'Is' Vice President? What, are we only targeting people with the exact job title 'Vice President'? Seems a bit too specific.
upvoted 0 times
Melina
10 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Option B is too specific. We should go with either A or C to capture all variations of Vice President titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
10 months ago
C) Match ANY overall logiC. Rule Group1: Match All Prospect List > Isn't > Suppression List A; B; C; D Rule Group2: Match All Prospect default field > Title > contains > Vice President; VP
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
10 months ago
A) Match ALL overall logiC. Prospect List > Isn't > suppression List A; B; C; D Prospect default field > Title > contains > Vice President; VP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shizue
11 months ago
Option D is my pick. 'Contains' is a more forgiving match than 'Is' for job titles, in case there's any variation in how they're written.
upvoted 0 times
Tamar
11 months ago
Yeah, option D with 'Contains' for job titles is the most inclusive choice. It's important to account for any variations in titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karina
11 months ago
I agree, 'Contains' will capture more variations in job titles compared to 'Is'. Option D seems like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gussie
11 months ago
I think option D is the best choice too. 'Contains' is more flexible for matching job titles.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jeanice
12 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Splitting it into two rule groups seems more flexible, in case we need to add more criteria later.
upvoted 0 times
Long
10 months ago
Option C does seem like the most logical choice for this automation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
11 months ago
I agree, having separate rule groups can make it easier to manage and update criteria in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
11 months ago
I think Option C is the best choice. It allows for more flexibility with the two rule groups.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cathrine
1 year ago
Option A looks good to me. Matching all prospects not on the suppression list and with 'Vice President' or 'VP' in their title seems straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Dallas
10 months ago
Let's go with option A then. It seems to be the best fit for our automation rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
10 months ago
I agree, option A seems to be the most accurate and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susy
11 months ago
That sounds like the right choice. It covers all the criteria we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
11 months ago
A) Match ALL overall logiC. Prospect List > Isn't > suppression List A; B; C; D Prospect default field > Title > contains > Vice President; VP
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. I can see how option C would work effectively in capturing the prospects we need without including those on the suppression list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alfred
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option C is the right choice. It allows for matching any job title containing Vice President while also excluding prospects on the suppression list.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
1 year ago
I think the correct answer is option A because it specifies to exclude prospects on the suppression list and match any job title containing Vice President.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel