Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Exam - Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Questions]

Universal Containers runs an application in a Private Space in the Frankfurt region. The majority of the application's users (based in Asia) are reporting issues related to high latency. What should an Architect recommend to remediate this issue cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

-

https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/heroku-connect-database-tables#encrypted-strings


by Pedro at Nov 19, 2025, 03:35 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Carylon
5 days ago
D seems unnecessary. A is the way to go for sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 days ago
I feel like B is risky. Deleting the Private Space could cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sue
15 days ago
But C might be more expensive. A is simpler.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jina
20 days ago
Option C could work too. More flexibility with a new Private Space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
26 days ago
I agree, A is cost-effective and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
1 month ago
I think option A is the best. It keeps the existing setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
1 month ago
D sounds risky, I wouldn’t want to lose the current setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elbert
2 months ago
Surprised that no one mentioned the performance impact of deleting the existing setup!
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
2 months ago
C could work, but why not just stick with one Private Space?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
2 months ago
I think B is better for cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
2 months ago
Haha, "Private Space" - sounds like a fancy name for a closet. Just throw it all in the cloud, problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
3 months ago
A) is a bold move, but I'm not sure the latency issues will be resolved. Gotta think outside the box!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
3 months ago
B) is the most cost-effective option. Who needs private spaces when you can just use the common runtime?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
3 months ago
I feel like option D might be overkill since it suggests starting fresh, but maybe it's worth it if the current setup is really causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider cost-effectiveness, and I think option B could be too expensive if we delete the Private Space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
3 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A might be risky since it involves moving the entire application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
3 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between options C and D. Wouldn't they both achieve the same result of adding a Tokyo region? I'd need to understand the nuances better to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
4 months ago
I'd be careful about deleting the existing Private Space entirely, as that could cause downtime or other issues. I think option C, adding a second instance in Tokyo, is the safest bet here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
4 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward solution to me. Deploying the app to a new Private Space in Tokyo and deleting the old one should give the users in Asia the lower latency they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
4 months ago
D) seems like the most straightforward solution. Simplicity is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
4 months ago
Option A seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of reducing latency by deploying closer to users, so option C sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
5 months ago
C) is the way to go. Gotta have that redundancy, yo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
5 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C - creating an additional Private Space in Tokyo. That way we can keep the existing setup while adding a closer region for the Asian users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
5 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'd need to think more about the trade-offs between the different options and how they might impact the application's performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
4 months ago
I think option A makes sense. It keeps the existing setup and just adds Tokyo.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel