New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Exam - Topic 2 Question 68 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) exam
Question #: 68
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Heroku Architect (Plat-Arch-206) Questions]

Universal Containers runs an application in a Private Space in the Frankfurt region. The majority of the application's users (based in Asia) are reporting issues related to high latency. What should an Architect recommend to remediate this issue cost-effectively?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

-

https://devcenter.heroku.com/articles/heroku-connect-database-tables#encrypted-strings


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Elbert
3 days ago
Surprised that no one mentioned the performance impact of deleting the existing setup!
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
8 days ago
C could work, but why not just stick with one Private Space?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
13 days ago
I think B is better for cost savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
18 days ago
Haha, "Private Space" - sounds like a fancy name for a closet. Just throw it all in the cloud, problem solved!
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
24 days ago
A) is a bold move, but I'm not sure the latency issues will be resolved. Gotta think outside the box!
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
29 days ago
B) is the most cost-effective option. Who needs private spaces when you can just use the common runtime?
upvoted 0 times
...
Isidra
1 month ago
I feel like option D might be overkill since it suggests starting fresh, but maybe it's worth it if the current setup is really causing issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 month ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to consider cost-effectiveness, and I think option B could be too expensive if we delete the Private Space.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isreal
1 month ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think option A might be risky since it involves moving the entire application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the difference between options C and D. Wouldn't they both achieve the same result of adding a Tokyo region? I'd need to understand the nuances better to decide.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
2 months ago
I'd be careful about deleting the existing Private Space entirely, as that could cause downtime or other issues. I think option C, adding a second instance in Tokyo, is the safest bet here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darell
2 months ago
Option D seems like the most straightforward solution to me. Deploying the app to a new Private Space in Tokyo and deleting the old one should give the users in Asia the lower latency they need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annette
2 months ago
D) seems like the most straightforward solution. Simplicity is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelo
3 months ago
Option A seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
3 months ago
I remember we discussed the importance of reducing latency by deploying closer to users, so option C sounds like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilda
3 months ago
C) is the way to go. Gotta have that redundancy, yo!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
3 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option C - creating an additional Private Space in Tokyo. That way we can keep the existing setup while adding a closer region for the Asian users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tommy
3 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I'd need to think more about the trade-offs between the different options and how they might impact the application's performance and cost.
upvoted 0 times
Annalee
2 months ago
I think option A makes sense. It keeps the existing setup and just adds Tokyo.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel