Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion

Universal Containers has external resources who only report back once a Service Appointment has been completed. All Internal resources need to report incremental progress on Service Appointments. How should a Consultant recommend implementing statuses to support these different user groups?
B) Limit Status Transition based on Profile.
A) Configure Status Transitions based on Resource Type.
C) Allow Status Transitions based on Role.
D) Block Status Transitions using a Validation Rule.

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's FSL-201 exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 9
[All FSL-201 Questions]

Universal Containers has external resources who only report back once a Service Appointment has been completed. All Internal resources need to report incremental progress on Service Appointments. How should a Consultant recommend implementing statuses to support these different user groups?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Alpha at May 05, 2022, 02:51 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium FSL-201 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Maryln
9 months ago
I think A is the most straightforward solution here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
9 months ago
Wait, can we really block transitions with D? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
9 months ago
C could work too, but it might complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Howard
9 months ago
I disagree, B might be more effective for controlling access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
9 months ago
A seems like the best option for different resource types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
9 months ago
Blocking transitions with a validation rule sounds complicated. I don’t recall us covering that as a best practice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Matthew
9 months ago
I feel like allowing status transitions based on role could be too broad. I think we should be more specific about user types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
9 months ago
I’m not entirely sure, but I think limiting status transitions based on profile could work too. It seems like a common approach we practiced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
10 months ago
I remember we discussed how different user groups might need different access to statuses, so maybe A is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephanie
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure OSPF supports Point-to-Point, Non-Broadcast Multi-Access, and Broadcast network types. I think Point-to-Multipoint is also one, but I'm not 100% certain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nidia
10 months ago
I practiced a similar question where StoreFront Resource Aggregation was involved, but I don't think it fits here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
10 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. Enterprise wireless access points typically have their own logging mechanisms, so I'm guessing that's the one that doesn't natively support syslog.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozelle
10 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. The options seem a bit confusing to me. I'll have to read through them again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kami
10 months ago
I'm pretty sure this is asking about promotional pricing, which is when a company temporarily lowers the price of a product to boost sales in the short term. I think option C is the best answer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel