Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 75 Discussion

universal container requires trained inspectors to make 3 site visits per year to inspect the container customers' sites. These visits must be scheduled within 14 days of inspection due date.What are two ways a Consultant can configure maintenance plans to meet the requirements?Choose 2 answers
A) Auto generate work order with a 14 days generation horizon and D) Auto generate work order with 14-day generation time frame
B) Associate work type called site to maintenance plan
C) Associate a required skill call site visits to maintain plans

Salesforce FSL-201 Exam - Topic 4 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's FSL-201 exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 4
[All FSL-201 Questions]

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Glennis
5 months ago
D sounds redundant, isn't it just a rephrasing of A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
6 months ago
Wait, can you really auto-generate work orders like that?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cory
6 months ago
C seems a bit off, not sure about that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyra
6 months ago
A is definitely one way to go!
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheal
6 months ago
I think B makes sense too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
6 months ago
I'm a bit confused about the required skill in option C. I don't remember if that was emphasized as necessary for maintenance plans.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
7 months ago
I remember discussing maintenance plans in class, and I think associating a work type could be important, so maybe option B is a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlean
7 months ago
I feel like option D is similar to A, but I can't recall the exact differences. They both mention a 14-day timeframe, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
7 months ago
I think option A sounds familiar, but I'm not entirely sure if it's the right phrasing. I remember something about generating work orders.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ammie
7 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. The wording is a bit tricky. I think I'll go with option A and C - auto-generating the work orders and associating a required skill for the site visits. Hopefully, that covers all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
8 months ago
I've got this! The solution is to use option B and associate a work type called "site" to the maintenance plan. That way, the system will automatically schedule the required 3 site visits per year. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jamal
8 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. What's the difference between option A and D? They both seem to be talking about auto-generating work orders, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach. Maybe I should consider option B as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The key is meeting the requirement of scheduling the site visits within 14 days of the inspection due date. I'm leaning towards option B and D to handle that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doyle
8 months ago
Hmm, this seems pretty straightforward. I think I'll go with option A and D - auto generating work orders with a 14-day generation horizon should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
1 year ago
I wonder if the inspectors have a secret handshake they use during these site visits. Gotta keep those maintenance plans in top shape, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hobert
1 year ago
I think option C is a bit overkill. Do we really need to associate a specific skill just for site visits? Seems like a lot of extra effort.
upvoted 0 times
Merrilee
12 months ago
B) Associate work type called site to maintenance plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
12 months ago
A) Auto generate work order with a 14 days generation horizon
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Simona
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about option B. Associating a work type called 'site' feels a bit redundant. But the other options look good to me.
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
12 months ago
I agree, option B does seem redundant. Options A and C seem like the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annelle
12 months ago
Option C) Associating a required skill called site visits to maintenance plans makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
12 months ago
Option A) Auto generate work order with a 14 days generation horizon sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherilyn
1 year ago
I believe option B is also important, associating a work type called site to maintenance plan can help in organizing the visits efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willis
1 year ago
I agree with Glory, auto generating work orders with a 14-day horizon makes sense for scheduling site visits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sonia
1 year ago
Option A and D seem like the most straightforward way to meet the requirements. Auto-generating work orders with a 14-day horizon should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
Eun
12 months ago
Option A and D seem like the most straightforward way to meet the requirements. Auto-generating work orders with a 14-day horizon should do the trick.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
12 months ago
D) Auto generate work order with 14-day generation time frame
upvoted 0 times
...
Danica
12 months ago
C) Associate a required skill call site visits to maintain plans
upvoted 0 times
...
Noemi
1 year ago
B) Associate work type called site to maintenance plan
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
1 year ago
A) Auto generate work order with a 14 days generation horizon
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
1 year ago
I think option A and D are the correct ways to configure maintenance plans.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel