Halloween Special 2026! Get Up to 25% OFF Practice Questions! Limited Time - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Education Cloud Consultant (ED-Con-101) Exam - Topic 6 Question 67 Discussion

Posted by Judy on Apr 23, 2023 at 01:27 PM

During the requirements gathering phase, the academic staff stated that students are independent of any Account or Company. The staff requested that the Contact's Account field be blank and hidden on the page layout.

What is the impact of creating a Contact without a parent Account?

Suggested Answer: A

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Education Cloud Consultant (ED-Con-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
34 comments · newest first
ME
Merlyn 12 months ago
Hiding the Account field might lead to confusion later on.
VI
Vincenza 12 months ago
I think ownership issues could be a big problem too.
NE
Nelida 12 months ago
Wait, are they really public to all users? That seems risky.
TA
Tandra 1 year ago
I agree, it adds unnecessary complexity!
MA
Magdalene 1 year ago
Contacts without an Account can be tricky.
NU
Nu 1 year ago
I vaguely recall that having no Account could lead to performance issues, so option B could be relevant, but I'm not entirely sure how that connects to ownership data skew.
VI
Vicente 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused about the implications of not having a parent Account. I thought it might make Contacts private, but I'm not certain if that's what option A is saying.
LA
Latonia 1 year ago
I think we practiced a similar question where we talked about ownership and sharing rules. I feel like option C might be the right answer since it mentions needing an Affiliation record.
MA
Maryanne 1 year ago
I remember discussing how creating a Contact without an Account could lead to issues with data visibility, but I'm not sure which option reflects that best.
DE
Deeanna 1 year ago
I'm pretty confident that the answer is A, Checkpointing and Write-ahead Logs. That's the approach I've learned about in the course materials, and it makes sense for Structured Streaming to use those techniques to ensure reliable processing.
MO
Mozell 1 year ago
I'm a bit unsure about the process, but I'll give it my best shot.
PR
Precious 1 year ago
This one seems pretty straightforward. I'm pretty sure the answer is B, Rainbow table.
CO
Coletta 1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about the relationship between business architecture and solution architecture. I'll need to think this through carefully.
MA
Mari 1 year ago
Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about resolving a name resolution issue, and the solution provided is to modify the name servers at the domain registrar. That makes sense to me, so I'll go with that.
RA
Raymon 1 year ago
Haha, imagine if the solution was to just leave the Contact's Account field blank and hidden. That would be like a big 'out of sight, out of mind' kind of deal. Not exactly the most practical approach, is it?
FA
Fausto 1 year ago
↳ replying to Raymon
User 3: Maybe there's a better way to handle this situation without compromising data security.
JE
Jerilyn 1 year ago
↳ replying to Raymon
User 2: I agree, it could lead to some data integrity issues down the line.
FR
France 1 year ago
↳ replying to Raymon
User 1: Yeah, that does seem like a strange request from the academic staff.
CH
Charisse 1 year ago
D is definitely not the answer. Exposing sensitive student data to all users is a huge security risk and goes against the requirements. Good thing that's not the case here!
RE
Reta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
C) Contacts will require manually creating a related Affiliation record to enable sharing, adding more complexity.
MI
Mignon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
B) Contacts are at risk of ownership data skew, which may result in performance issues.
TA
Tamra 1 year ago
↳ replying to Charisse
A) Contacts are private only to the record owner, and inaccessible to other users.
PE
Penney 1 year ago
I'm leaning towards B. Contacts without a parent Account could lead to data skew and performance issues down the line. The academic staff may want to reconsider this requirement.
ST
Stephen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Penney
It's important to address potential issues early on in the requirements gathering phase.
DE
Deja 1 year ago
↳ replying to Penney
Maybe the academic staff should consider the implications of not having a parent Account for Contacts.
ER
Erasmo 1 year ago
↳ replying to Penney
I agree, data skew can definitely cause performance issues.
JO
Johana 2 years ago
But wouldn't manually creating a related Affiliation record add more complexity to the process?
NO
Norah 2 years ago
Option C seems to be the right choice here. Creating a separate Affiliation record is definitely more complex, but it aligns with the requirement of keeping students independent from any Account or Company.
DA
Daryl 1 year ago
↳ replying to Norah
True, it's important to prioritize meeting the requirements set by the academic staff.
FA
Fannie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Norah
It might, but it's necessary to ensure that the requirement of keeping students independent is met.
MO
Moon 1 year ago
↳ replying to Norah
But wouldn't that add more complexity to the process of managing contacts?
ST
Stephanie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Norah
I agree, creating a separate Affiliation record seems like the best way to keep students independent.
PE
Pearline 2 years ago
I agree with Elmira. It might cause performance problems if ownership data is not properly managed.
EL
Elmira 2 years ago
I think creating a Contact without a parent Account could lead to data skew issues.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel