MENU
The Alumni Relations department wants to track alumni and its chapter memberships. The department wants to easily see the
Primary Chapter on the Contact record. The system admin prefers to use the standard features that are available with Education Data
Architecture (EDA).
Which step should the consultant take to meet this requirement?
38 comments · newest first
GA
Gail
11 months ago
Wait, can you really just use standard features for this?
CH
Chantell
11 months ago
I think B is better for flexibility.
JU
Junita
11 months ago
C doesn't really address the requirement, right?
GL
Glory
11 months ago
Not sure if A will cover all the needs...
DA
Dana
11 months ago
A seems like the easiest option!
BA
Barbra
12 months ago
I vaguely recall that affiliations are important in EDA, so option A might be the best choice, but I’m not 100% sure about the specifics of setting it up.
RA
Raymon
12 months ago
I’m leaning towards option C because it seems like a simpler solution, but I’m not confident if it fully addresses the requirement for tracking the Primary Chapter.
LE
Lezlie
1 year ago
I remember practicing a question similar to this, and I feel like creating a custom field might complicate things. Option B seems like it could work, but is it really necessary?
LA
Lai
1 year ago
I think option A makes sense since it mentions using the standard features in EDA, but I'm not entirely sure how the mapping works.
GA
Galen
1 year ago
Hmm, this is a good one. I'm a bit torn between A and B, but I think I'll go with A since it mentions using the standard EDA features. Gotta love those standard features!
LA
Laurel
1 year ago
Alright, let's see. They want to easily see the Primary Chapter on the Contact record, and the admin wants to use standard EDA features. I'm leaning towards option B, but I'll need to make sure that's the best fit.
TO
Tonja
1 year ago
Okay, let me see here. The key seems to be using the standard EDA features, so I'm thinking option A might be the way to go. I'll double-check the details on that.
CA
Carey
1 year ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the requirements and think through the standard EDA features that are available.
SE
Serina
1 year ago
A) Ah, the sweet smell of efficiency. Why reinvent the wheel when the consultant can just leverage the existing EDA tools? A wins my vote, hands down.
LE
Lenny
1 year ago
Jame: Let's go with A then, it's the most efficient choice.
JA
Jame
1 year ago
User 2: Definitely, using the standard features will make things easier for everyone.
CO
Colette
1 year ago
User 1: I agree, A seems like the most straightforward option.
HE
Hermila
1 year ago
A) This is a no-brainer. The consultant should take the path of least resistance and use the standard features. Who needs custom fields when you can keep it simple?
AN
Angelyn
1 year ago
B) Create an Affiliation record type for Alumni Chapter and a custom field for the Primary Chapter on the Contact record.
TA
Tabetha
1 year ago
A) Create an Affiliation mapping to the Primary Chapter field in EDA Settings.
ST
Stacey
1 year ago
I disagree, I think option A is better because it utilizes standard features in EDA.
EL
Elza
1 year ago
C) A custom picklist value? Really? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. I'm voting for A, the consultant should just use the standard features.
IN
Ines
1 year ago
Creating an Affiliation mapping to the Primary Chapter field sounds like the most efficient solution.
AR
Aretha
1 year ago
Yeah, creating a custom picklist value seems like unnecessary work.
RI
Ricarda
1 year ago
I agree, using the standard features would be the best option.
BR
Brice
1 year ago
I agree with Kelvin, creating a custom field for Primary Chapter makes sense.
KE
Kelvin
1 year ago
I think we should go with option B.
IZ
Izetta
1 year ago
B) Hmm, creating a custom field sounds more flexible, but it might be overkill for this use case. I'd go with the simpler option A.
IS
Isabella
1 year ago
A) Let's go with option A then, it's the standard feature that will meet the requirement.
RO
Rosalind
1 year ago
C) Yeah, option A seems like the most efficient solution.
DO
Donte
1 year ago
B) Yeah, that makes sense. It's simpler and should meet the requirement.
SH
Shenika
1 year ago
B) I agree, keeping it simple with option A is the way to go.
EL
Elizabeth
1 year ago
A) Create an Affiliation mapping to the Primary Chapter field in EDA Settings.
OM
Omega
1 year ago
A) Create an Affiliation mapping to the Primary Chapter field in EDA Settings.
LO
Lorrie
1 year ago
A) Seems like the easiest solution to me. Why complicate things when the standard features can get the job done?
CO
Colette
1 year ago
User 3: Yeah, let's not overcomplicate things.
DE
Devora
1 year ago
User 2: Agreed, keeping it simple with standard features is the way to go.
LA
Lawanda
1 year ago
User 1: I think we should go with option A.