New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 8 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 8
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers uses multiple Salesforce orgs for its different lines of business (LOBs). In a recent analysis, the architect found that UC could have a more complete view of its customers by gathering customer data from different orgs.

What two options can an architect recommend to accomplish the customer 360-degree view?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

by Helga at Nov 24, 2025, 04:33 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Jesusa
3 days ago
C and D are both solid options, but I think D has the edge. Centralizing customer data and using integration to sync it with the LOB orgs is a smart way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shizue
8 days ago
Haha, migrating to a single org? Good luck with that! I'd go with D - the hub-and-spoke strategy seems like the most straightforward way to get that 360-degree view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ludivina
13 days ago
A is an interesting idea, but I'm not sure it's the most practical solution. Allowing direct connections between orgs could get messy and hard to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crissy
18 days ago
D looks like the best choice to me. Consolidating customer data in a single master org and using integration to sync with the LOB orgs seems like the most efficient and secure approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitsue
24 days ago
C and D seem like the most viable options. I'm leaning towards C since it allows for a more centralized and controlled approach to customer data consolidation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnna
29 days ago
I feel like option C could work too, especially if we’re using managed packages to pull data together. That was a topic in our last review session.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quentin
1 month ago
I’m a bit confused about the Complete Graph strategy in option A. It seems complex, but I can't recall the details.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
1 month ago
I think option D sounds familiar; it’s like the Hub-and-Spoke model we practiced. It seems to make sense for consolidating data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 month ago
I remember studying multi-org strategies, but I'm not entirely sure which one would be best for a complete customer view.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edmond
2 months ago
The Hub-and-Spoke strategy seems like the most straightforward option to me. It allows you to maintain a single source of truth for customer data while still giving the LOBs the ability to access and update it. I think that's the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
2 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different multi-org strategies. I think I need to do some more research on the pros and cons of each one before I can make a decision. Maybe I'll start by looking up some examples or case studies to get a better understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
2 months ago
Okay, I think I've got it. The Complete Graph strategy sounds like it could work, but it might be a bit messy to have each org directly connected to every other one. The Single Package strategy could work, but it might be a bit more complex to develop and deploy. I'm going to go with the Hub-and-Spoke option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
2 months ago
I think option D is the best. Centralized data is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
2 months ago
I agree, D is solid!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gregoria
3 months ago
Option D seems like the best choice for a master data approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards the Hub-and-Spoke strategy. It seems like the most straightforward way to maintain a 360-degree view while still allowing the LOBs to access and update the data. I'll need to read through the options carefully, though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
3 months ago
This is a tricky one. I'm not sure if I fully understand the different multi-org strategies, but I think the key is to find a way to consolidate the customer data without having to migrate everything to a single org.
upvoted 0 times
Yvonne
3 months ago
I think option D sounds solid. Hub-and-Spoke could work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gabriele
3 months ago
True, but it might get messy with too many connections.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel