Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 8 Question 40 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 40
Topic #: 8
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

There has been an increase in the number of defects .Universal Containers (UC) found the root cause to be decreased in quality if code. Which two options can enforce code quality in UC's continuous integration process? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Adelina at Jun 28, 2024, 02:47 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Hillary
5 months ago
Increasing the testing team? Not sure that solves the root issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mona
5 months ago
Definitely A and D! Can't skip on code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
5 months ago
Wait, are we really relying on manual reviews? Seems risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
5 months ago
I think static code analysis is way more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
6 months ago
A manual code review before deployment is a must!
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
6 months ago
I’m leaning towards manual code reviews before deployment to the testing sandbox, but I also think static analysis is a solid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
6 months ago
I feel like increasing the testing team size might not directly improve code quality, but it could help with overall coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
6 months ago
I think introducing static code analysis could really help catch issues early, but I can't recall if it was specifically mentioned for the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
6 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of code reviews in our study group, but I'm not sure if manual reviews before production or testing are more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
6 months ago
Manual code review is always a good practice, but I'm not sure if that's the best approach for a continuous integration process. I'll have to weigh the pros and cons.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clorinda
6 months ago
Introducing static code analysis before the testing sandbox seems like a great way to catch issues early on. That's definitely one I'll consider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
6 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to think through the different options and how they relate to enforcing code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elke
7 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question. I'd focus on the two options that directly address code quality in the continuous integration process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
7 months ago
This seems straightforward - I think the answer is B, defining a TACACS server group for authentication in the switch configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvie
7 months ago
Yeah, that makes sense to me. Without knowing the key actors and their needs, it would be hard to determine the right flow and acceptance criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
11 months ago
Option B for manual review before production is a no-go. I don't want my code to go through that much scrutiny!
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
11 months ago
Haha, they should just throw the entire codebase into a black hole and start over! That'll solve the quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosann
11 months ago
I don't think increasing the testing team size will really help with the root cause of decreased code quality. That's just treating the symptoms.
upvoted 0 times
Rozella
10 months ago
B) Introduce manual code review before deployment to the production org.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
10 months ago
I agree, manual code review and static code analysis can help improve code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
10 months ago
D) Introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delmy
11 months ago
A) Introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Troy
11 months ago
I agree, and option D with static code analysis is also a great way to enforce code quality.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
10 months ago
Yes, static code analysis can catch potential issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
10 months ago
D) Introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
11 months ago
A) Introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
12 months ago
A manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox seems like a good idea to catch issues early on.
upvoted 0 times
Larae
11 months ago
D) Introduce static code analysis before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
11 months ago
A) Introduce manual code review before deployment to the testing sandbox.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zona
1 year ago
Increasing the testing team size might help too, but I believe focusing on code review and analysis is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladis
1 year ago
I agree with Jess. Manual code review and static code analysis are crucial in catching defects early.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
1 year ago
I think option A and D can help enforce code quality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel