Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Exam Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Topic 6 Question 30 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect exam
Question #: 30
Topic #: 6
[All Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect Questions]

Universal Containers is having trouble deploying metadata from SIT to UAT. UAT is

complaining that it does not recognize some new Salesforce metadata types to be deployed. The deployment from Dev to SIT worked perfectly

What could be the problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alex
1 years ago
I'm with Gracie on this one. Option C seems the most likely explanation. Gotta make sure your environments are all on the same page, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
William
1 years ago
Haha, option A - 'no problem, this is expected behavior?' Yeah, right. That's the easy way out. Clearly, there's something going on with the Salesforce releases here.
upvoted 0 times
Phung
11 months ago
Or maybe there's a bug in the deployment process causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
11 months ago
Could be, maybe they need to sync up their Salesforce versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delpha
11 months ago
Maybe UAT is on a different release than SIT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
Or maybe there's a compatibility issue with the new metadata types.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francoise
1 years ago
Could be, maybe they need to sync up their releases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tyisha
1 years ago
Maybe UAT is on a different release than SIT.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Billy
1 years ago
It's also a possibility that there is no problem at all and this behavior is expected. Maybe there's nothing wrong with the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angella
1 years ago
I think using the DX command line could potentially solve the issue. It might provide more control over the deployment process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
1 years ago
But wouldn't it be more logical for SIT to be on a preview release and UAT to be not? Maybe the versions are not aligned correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Suzi
1 years ago
I agree with you, Louann. It's possible that UAT is on a preview release while SIT is not. That could be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
1 years ago
I'm leaning towards option D. Using the DX command line might be the way to go if the GUI is giving you trouble with the metadata deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracie
1 years ago
Hmm, I'm pretty sure option C is the right answer here. UAT must be on a different release than SIT, that's gotta be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Tabetha
12 months ago
We should check the release versions for SIT and UAT.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
12 months ago
That makes sense, different releases could definitely cause issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
1 years ago
Option C) SIT is on a preview release and UAT is not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
1 years ago
That makes sense, the releases must not be aligned.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tijuana
1 years ago
I agree, that could definitely be causing the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martin
1 years ago
Option C) SIT is on a preview release and UAT is not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
1 years ago
Option C) SIT is on a preview release and UAT is not.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louann
1 years ago
I think the problem might be related to the different Salesforce releases. That could explain why UAT is complaining.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernardo
1 years ago
It's possible that SIT is on a preview release and UAT is not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
1 years ago
I'm not sure if this is expected behavior or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
1 years ago
I believe using the DX command line could help solve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maile
1 years ago
Could it be that the deployment process is different between SIT and UAT?
upvoted 0 times
...
Melinda
1 years ago
Maybe UAT is on a preview release and SIT is not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tracey
1 years ago
I think the problem might be with the Salesforce metadata types.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel