Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) is implementing a governance framework and has asked the Architect to make recommendations regarding release planning. Which two decisions should the Architect make when planning for releases? Choose 2 answers
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues. and D) When to test a new UC feature release if there are issues.
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
B) Whether Salesforce will wait to upgrade the pod until after a UC release is complete.

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is implementing a governance framework and has asked the Architect to make recommendations regarding release planning. Which two decisions should the Architect make when planning for releases? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Zona
9 months ago
D seems a bit off, timing for testing shouldn't be a decision point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
9 months ago
Wait, can they really roll back a release? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
9 months ago
I think B is more important than people realize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
9 months ago
Totally agree with A, testing is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
10 months ago
A and C are definitely the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
10 months ago
I wonder if option D is relevant here. Testing timing is tricky, but I think it should be planned carefully to avoid issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
10 months ago
Option C seems important too, especially if something goes wrong after a release. We discussed rollback strategies in our last study group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
10 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option B. I feel like the timing of Salesforce upgrades could impact our release, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
10 months ago
I think option A makes sense because testing existing functionality is crucial to avoid regressions. I remember practicing a similar question about testing strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
11 months ago
Definitely want to nail down the regression testing plan. And the rollback process is super important - we can't afford any major issues after the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
11 months ago
I think the key decisions here are how to test for regressions and how to roll back if needed. Those will be critical to ensure a smooth release process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the Salesforce upgrade timing. Do we need to coordinate with them on the release schedule? I'll have to read that part of the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
11 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'd focus on testing for regressions and planning the rollback process in case there are any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
1 year ago
I believe the Architect should also decide when to test a new UC feature release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 year ago
Hmm, I'd say the Architect should also consider how many bugs they can tolerate before delaying the release. Gotta know when to pull the plug, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
1 year ago
D is a good one too, testing new features if there are issues is crucial. Can't just forge ahead blindly!
upvoted 0 times
Beata
1 year ago
D is a good one too, testing new features if there are issues is crucial. Can't just forge ahead blindly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
1 year ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
1 year ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
1 year ago
I agree with Clemencia. It's important to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
1 year ago
I think the Architect should decide how to test existing functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
1 year ago
B is a bit irrelevant, the Architect should focus on UC's own release planning, not Salesforce's schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
1 year ago
A and C are definitely important decisions the Architect should make. Gotta make sure existing functionality doesn't break and have a rollback plan in place.
upvoted 0 times
Precious
1 year ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
1 year ago
Yes, those are crucial decisions to make for release planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 year ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
1 year ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
1 year ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
1 year ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel