Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) is implementing a governance framework and has asked the Architect to make recommendations regarding release planning. Which two decisions should the Architect make when planning for releases? Choose 2 answers
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues. and D) When to test a new UC feature release if there are issues.
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
B) Whether Salesforce will wait to upgrade the pod until after a UC release is complete.

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 3 Question 61 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 61
Topic #: 3
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is implementing a governance framework and has asked the Architect to make recommendations regarding release planning. Which two decisions should the Architect make when planning for releases? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Zona
6 months ago
D seems a bit off, timing for testing shouldn't be a decision point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
6 months ago
Wait, can they really roll back a release? That seems risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
6 months ago
I think B is more important than people realize.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mable
6 months ago
Totally agree with A, testing is crucial!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
6 months ago
A and C are definitely the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pedro
7 months ago
I wonder if option D is relevant here. Testing timing is tricky, but I think it should be planned carefully to avoid issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
7 months ago
Option C seems important too, especially if something goes wrong after a release. We discussed rollback strategies in our last study group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammi
7 months ago
I'm not entirely sure about option B. I feel like the timing of Salesforce upgrades could impact our release, but I can't recall the specifics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
7 months ago
I think option A makes sense because testing existing functionality is crucial to avoid regressions. I remember practicing a similar question about testing strategies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
7 months ago
Definitely want to nail down the regression testing plan. And the rollback process is super important - we can't afford any major issues after the release.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
8 months ago
I think the key decisions here are how to test for regressions and how to roll back if needed. Those will be critical to ensure a smooth release process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shayne
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the Salesforce upgrade timing. Do we need to coordinate with them on the release schedule? I'll have to read that part of the question more carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margurite
8 months ago
This question seems pretty straightforward. I'd focus on testing for regressions and planning the rollback process in case there are any issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Anika
11 months ago
I believe the Architect should also decide when to test a new UC feature release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
11 months ago
Hmm, I'd say the Architect should also consider how many bugs they can tolerate before delaying the release. Gotta know when to pull the plug, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jolanda
11 months ago
D is a good one too, testing new features if there are issues is crucial. Can't just forge ahead blindly!
upvoted 0 times
Beata
10 months ago
D is a good one too, testing new features if there are issues is crucial. Can't just forge ahead blindly!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
10 months ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
11 months ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Paris
11 months ago
I agree with Clemencia. It's important to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
12 months ago
I think the Architect should decide how to test existing functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Franklyn
12 months ago
B is a bit irrelevant, the Architect should focus on UC's own release planning, not Salesforce's schedule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
12 months ago
A and C are definitely important decisions the Architect should make. Gotta make sure existing functionality doesn't break and have a rollback plan in place.
upvoted 0 times
Precious
10 months ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
10 months ago
Yes, those are crucial decisions to make for release planning.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
10 months ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
11 months ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wade
11 months ago
C) How to roll back to the previous Salesforce release if there are issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Juliana
11 months ago
A) How to test existing functionality to ensure no regressions are introduced.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel