Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam

Question #: 14
Topic #: 1

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) uses a managed package to install an internal Sales app in

five orgs. Within each org there are integrations and local processes with the objects of the

managed package. UC wants to use unlocked packages for better integration with CI/CD

processes.

What would the Salesforce architect recommend for this migration?

AExport all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the
unlocked package with the same namespace as the Managed package and restore all data.

BExport all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the
unlocked package without namespace and restore all data.

CDo not change to unlocked package as it is possible to perform all CI/CD processes with
the managed package.

DMigrate all classes, Visualforce, and components from the managed package to the
unlocked package. Install the new version of the managed package (objects/fields only)
and the unlocked package with the other components.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A, D

by Frederica at Feb 02, 2023, 04:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Adelina

5 months ago

D sounds complicated but might be worth it for the components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonne

6 months ago

Wait, can you really do CI/CD with managed packages? Sounds sketchy.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bong

6 months ago

C is a no-go, CI/CD is way better with unlocked packages!

upvoted 0 times

...

In

6 months ago

I disagree, B could work too if you don't need the namespace.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonida

6 months ago

Option A seems like the safest bet for data integrity.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kenda

6 months ago

I recall a practice question that emphasized the need to export and reinstall with the same namespace. So, option A seems to align with that, but I’m a bit hesitant.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edna

6 months ago

I thought we learned that you can still do CI/CD with managed packages, so maybe option C is valid? But I’m not completely confident about that.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alton

6 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D could be a good approach since it mentions migrating components separately. That might help with integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maxima

7 months ago

I remember discussing the importance of maintaining the same namespace when migrating to unlocked packages. I think option A might be the right choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Louvenia

7 months ago

Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the advanced ledger entries feature, but it sounds like that might be the way to go here. I'll need to do a bit more research on that before I can confidently answer the question.

upvoted 0 times

...

Adelle

7 months ago

I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. If a System Error occurs in the Init State, the next state executed should be the Init state again to handle the error.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

7 months ago

I can't remember exactly, but I feel like this might be related to matching financing since they're using the funds to purchase both long-term assets and inventories.

upvoted 0 times

...

Albert

7 months ago

Based on my experience, the "trace" option is usually the way to go to get detailed information about the packet processing. I'd go with Option B to use the "capture" command with the "trace" option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shanda

11 months ago

Option A - the 'Export and Restore' approach. Sounds like a job for the Salesforce Superhero team, complete with capes and tights.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

11 months ago

Option B sounds like a recipe for disaster. Losing the namespace could lead to all sorts of integration nightmares. I'd rather not wake up in a cold sweat over that one.

upvoted 0 times

Lea

10 months ago

A) That sounds like a solid plan. Migrating everything to the unlocked package while keeping the namespace intact seems like the safest option.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mari

10 months ago

D) Migrate all classes, Visualforce, and components from the managed package to the unlocked package. Install the new version of the managed package (objects/fields only) and the unlocked package with the other components.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hermila

10 months ago

B) I agree, losing the namespace could cause a lot of issues. It's better to stick with the same namespace for smoother integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

10 months ago

A) Export all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the unlocked package with the same namespace as the Managed package and restore all data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gilbert

11 months ago

Option C? Are you kidding me? CI/CD with a managed package? That's like trying to fly a plane with a blindfold on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melvin

11 months ago

I'd go with Option D. Keeping the managed package for the objects and fields, while migrating the other components to an unlocked package, seems like the best compromise.

upvoted 0 times