Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Universal Containers (UC) uses a managed package to install an internal Sales app infive orgs. Within each org there are integrations and local processes with the objects of themanaged package. UC wants to use unlocked packages for better integration with CI/CDprocesses.What would the Salesforce architect recommend for this migration?
A) Export all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the unlocked package with the same namespace as the Managed package and restore all data. and D) Migrate all classes, Visualforce, and components from the managed package to the unlocked package. Install the new version of the managed package (objects/fields only) and the unlocked package with the other components.
B) Export all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the unlocked package without namespace and restore all data.
C) Do not change to unlocked package as it is possible to perform all CI/CD processes with the managed package.

Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Exam - Topic 1 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 1
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) uses a managed package to install an internal Sales app in

five orgs. Within each org there are integrations and local processes with the objects of the

managed package. UC wants to use unlocked packages for better integration with CI/CD

processes.

What would the Salesforce architect recommend for this migration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, D

by Frederica at Feb 02, 2023, 04:41 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Development Lifecycle and Deployment Architect (Plat-Arch-202) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Adelina
8 months ago
D sounds complicated but might be worth it for the components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonne
9 months ago
Wait, can you really do CI/CD with managed packages? Sounds sketchy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bong
9 months ago
C is a no-go, CI/CD is way better with unlocked packages!
upvoted 0 times
...
In
9 months ago
I disagree, B could work too if you don't need the namespace.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonida
9 months ago
Option A seems like the safest bet for data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenda
9 months ago
I recall a practice question that emphasized the need to export and reinstall with the same namespace. So, option A seems to align with that, but I’m a bit hesitant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
9 months ago
I thought we learned that you can still do CI/CD with managed packages, so maybe option C is valid? But I’m not completely confident about that.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alton
9 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like option D could be a good approach since it mentions migrating components separately. That might help with integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maxima
10 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of maintaining the same namespace when migrating to unlocked packages. I think option A might be the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louvenia
10 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one. I'm not super familiar with the advanced ledger entries feature, but it sounds like that might be the way to go here. I'll need to do a bit more research on that before I can confidently answer the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
10 months ago
I'm pretty confident I know the answer to this one. If a System Error occurs in the Init State, the next state executed should be the Init state again to handle the error.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verona
10 months ago
I can't remember exactly, but I feel like this might be related to matching financing since they're using the funds to purchase both long-term assets and inventories.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
10 months ago
Based on my experience, the "trace" option is usually the way to go to get detailed information about the packet processing. I'd go with Option B to use the "capture" command with the "trace" option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shanda
1 year ago
Option A - the 'Export and Restore' approach. Sounds like a job for the Salesforce Superhero team, complete with capes and tights.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
1 year ago
Option B sounds like a recipe for disaster. Losing the namespace could lead to all sorts of integration nightmares. I'd rather not wake up in a cold sweat over that one.
upvoted 0 times
Lea
1 year ago
A) That sounds like a solid plan. Migrating everything to the unlocked package while keeping the namespace intact seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 year ago
D) Migrate all classes, Visualforce, and components from the managed package to the unlocked package. Install the new version of the managed package (objects/fields only) and the unlocked package with the other components.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
1 year ago
B) I agree, losing the namespace could cause a lot of issues. It's better to stick with the same namespace for smoother integration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
1 year ago
A) Export all data from objects/fields of the managed package, uninstall it, install the unlocked package with the same namespace as the Managed package and restore all data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilbert
1 year ago
Option C? Are you kidding me? CI/CD with a managed package? That's like trying to fly a plane with a blindfold on.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 year ago
I'd go with Option D. Keeping the managed package for the objects and fields, while migrating the other components to an unlocked package, seems like the best compromise.
upvoted 0 times
Lucy
1 year ago
That way, we can benefit from better integration with CI/CD processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emerson
1 year ago
It's a good idea to keep the managed package for the objects and fields while moving the other components to an unlocked package.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 year ago
I agree, Option D seems like the best approach for this migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jamal
1 year ago
Option A seems like the safest approach, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient. Migrating all the data could be a pain.
upvoted 0 times
Lourdes
1 year ago
That could work too, but it might be more complex to manage both the old and new packages during the transition.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
1 year ago
What about option D? Migrating the classes and components seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 year ago
Yeah, I agree. It might take a lot of time to export and restore all that data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
1 year ago
Option A seems like the safest approach, but I'm not sure if it's the most efficient. Migrating all the data could be a pain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
1 year ago
Maybe there's a more efficient way to handle the migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
1 year ago
True, it could take a lot of time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
1 year ago
But migrating all that data might be a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawanna
1 year ago
I think option A is the safest choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shad
1 year ago
I'm not sure about option D. I think option A might be safer as it involves exporting all data before making any changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wei
1 year ago
I agree with Ilene. Option D seems like the most efficient way to migrate to unlocked packages without losing important data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilene
1 year ago
I think option D is the best choice. It allows for a smooth transition to unlocked packages while still keeping the necessary components.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel