New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 5
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers has a large number of Opportunity fields (100) that they want to track field history on. Which two actions should an architect perform in order to meet this requirement? Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

creating multiple similar products and distributing the skew across those products can be a way to mitigate issues related to lookup skew. The article explains that lookup skew happens when a very large number of records are associated with a single record in the lookup object, and this can cause record locking and performance issues. The article suggests creating multiple copies of the same product record and assigning different child records to each copy, so that the number of child records per parent record is reduced.


Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Norah
3 months ago
Not sure about A, seems like overkill for just history tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rutha
3 months ago
Totally agree with D, it's straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irving
3 months ago
Wait, can you really track 100 fields at once? Seems excessive!
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
4 months ago
I think A and B are better options for flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
4 months ago
D is the easiest way to track those fields!
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
4 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the custom object options. I think both A and B could be useful, but I’m not clear on the differences between them in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to manage field history, and I recall that using analytic snapshots was not the best fit for tracking changes. So I’m leaning towards D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Curtis
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like creating a custom object could be a valid approach too. Maybe options A or B could work, but I need to think about the implications of each.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rashad
5 months ago
I remember we discussed the limits of field history tracking in class, and I think option D might be the right choice since it directly mentions setting history tracking for those fields.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
5 months ago
I'm leaning towards the custom object approach, but I want to double-check the details to make sure I understand it correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
5 months ago
Selecting the fields in the Opportunity Set History Tracking page seems like the easiest option, but I'm not sure if that fully meets the requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
5 months ago
Creating a custom object to store the previous and new field values sounds like the most comprehensive solution to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cyril
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused about the difference between a custom object and Analytic Snapshots. I'll need to review those concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
5 months ago
This seems like a straightforward question, I think I've got a good handle on the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to think through the options carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carri
5 months ago
Okay, let me see here. Based on the details provided, I'm leaning towards Honeypot as the answer. The key is that John set up a decoy system to lure in and track the malicious hackers, which is exactly what a honeypot is designed to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
10 months ago
I'm going with B and D. Gotta love those multiple-choice questions where you can pick more than one answer!
upvoted 0 times
Luther
9 months ago
Definitely, it's a good strategy for multiple-choice questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hortencia
9 months ago
Great choices! B and D cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
9 months ago
I agree, it makes it easier to cover all the bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chuck
9 months ago
Yeah, it's great when you can select multiple answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
9 months ago
I think B and D are the right choices too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
9 months ago
I agree, those seem like the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
9 months ago
I think B and D are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammi
10 months ago
I agree, B and D are the way to go. D is the simplest solution, and B provides more detailed history if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fredric
10 months ago
B and D look like the best options to me. Creating a custom object to store the changes seems like overkill for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
11 months ago
I'm not sure about using Analytic Snapshots. Maybe we should just select the 100 fields in the Opportunity Set History Tracking page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Angelica
11 months ago
I agree with Cristal. We should also create a custom object to store the previous and new field values.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
11 months ago
I think we should create a custom object to store a copy of the record when changed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel