Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is facing data quality issues where Sales Reps are creating duplicate customer accounts, contacts, and leads. UC wants to fix this issue immediately by prompting users about a record that possibly exists in Salesforce. UC wants a report regarding duplicate records. What would be the recommended approach to help UC start immediately?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Evangelina at May 28, 2023, 12:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Joesph
4 months ago
Definitely need to address those duplicates ASAP!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
4 months ago
I disagree, blocking duplicates outright might frustrate users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
5 months ago
Wait, can we really trust standard matching rules?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
5 months ago
I think creating a report first is crucial before taking any action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
5 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
5 months ago
I have a vague recollection that using duplicate rules is a best practice for this kind of issue, so I lean towards option B as well, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
5 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between blocking duplicates or just reporting them. I think option B is the safest choice for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like triggers might be more complex than necessary for this situation. Maybe option A or D could be overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
6 months ago
I remember we discussed duplicate rules in class, and I think option B sounds familiar since it mentions using standard matching rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
6 months ago
I vaguely recall that using standard matching rules is usually recommended for quick implementations. So, I might lean towards option B as well, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
6 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between blocking duplicates or just alerting users. I think option B is the best balance for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
6 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like triggers might be more complex than necessary for this situation. Maybe option A or D could be overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
7 months ago
I remember we discussed duplicate rules in class, and I think option B sounds familiar since it allows for reporting and alerts, which seems like a quick fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
7 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. High bureaucracy, lots of meetings, and micromanagement - that really screams power distance to me. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
7 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the syntax rules for valid macros.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
7 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The definition clearly states that a control objective is a desired result or purpose, so the answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
11 months ago
Triggers? Matching criteria? Nah, I'm going with Option B. Keeping it simple and using the standard features is the way to go. Less code, more productivity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
11 months ago
Option A looks good, but triggers can be tricky to maintain. I'd rather let Salesforce handle the duplicate detection for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
11 months ago
Haha, Option D with a custom matching criteria? That's like trying to reinvent the wheel. Why not use the tools Salesforce provides?
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
10 months ago
C) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to block for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
10 months ago
B) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to report and alert for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
11 months ago
A) Create an after insert and update trigger on the account, contact and lead, and send an error if a duplicate is found using a custom matching criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
12 months ago
I'd go with C. Blocking the user from creating duplicates is the best way to ensure data quality, even if it's a bit more restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
10 months ago
Agreed. It's better to be a bit more restrictive to maintain data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
11 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. Preventing duplicates from being created in the first place is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
11 months ago
C) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to block for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
1 year ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Duplicate rules are a built-in feature, and using standard matching with report and alert is a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
10 months ago
Adell: Definitely, having a report and alert system will help Universal Containers address the problem quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
10 months ago
User 3: It's important to have a system in place to catch duplicates before they cause data quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
10 months ago
User 2: Agreed, using duplicate rules with standard matching rules and alerts is a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
11 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
11 months ago
User 4: Let's implement it quickly to improve our data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
12 months ago
User 3: That way we can catch duplicates right away and take action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
12 months ago
User 2: Agreed, duplicate rules with standard matching and alerts sound like a good plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
12 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
1 year ago
That's a good point, Melissa. Triggers can definitely help in real-time prevention of duplicate records. UC should consider that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more effective. By using triggers, UC can prevent duplicates from being created in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 year ago
I think option B is the best approach. It will help UC identify duplicates and take action immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 year ago
That's a good point, Aron. Option A does provide real-time prevention of duplicates. It's a tough choice between the two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
1 year ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more effective. By creating triggers with custom matching criteria, UC can prevent duplicates right at the point of creation or update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
1 year ago
I think option B is the best approach. It will help UC identify and report duplicate records using standard matching rules.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel