New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 2 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 2
[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers (UC) is facing data quality issues where Sales Reps are creating duplicate customer accounts, contacts, and leads. UC wants to fix this issue immediately by prompting users about a record that possibly exists in Salesforce. UC wants a report regarding duplicate records. What would be the recommended approach to help UC start immediately?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Evangelina at May 28, 2023, 12:00 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Joesph
2 months ago
Definitely need to address those duplicates ASAP!
upvoted 0 times
...
Aja
2 months ago
I disagree, blocking duplicates outright might frustrate users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roslyn
3 months ago
Wait, can we really trust standard matching rules?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernest
3 months ago
I think creating a report first is crucial before taking any action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
3 months ago
Option B seems like the best choice for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frankie
3 months ago
I have a vague recollection that using duplicate rules is a best practice for this kind of issue, so I lean towards option B as well, but I’m not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between blocking duplicates or just reporting them. I think option B is the safest choice for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgene
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like triggers might be more complex than necessary for this situation. Maybe option A or D could be overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Milly
4 months ago
I remember we discussed duplicate rules in class, and I think option B sounds familiar since it mentions using standard matching rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arminda
4 months ago
I vaguely recall that using standard matching rules is usually recommended for quick implementations. So, I might lean towards option B as well, but I'm not completely confident.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olen
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to choose between blocking duplicates or just alerting users. I think option B is the best balance for immediate action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quiana
5 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like triggers might be more complex than necessary for this situation. Maybe option A or D could be overkill?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammara
5 months ago
I remember we discussed duplicate rules in class, and I think option B sounds familiar since it allows for reporting and alerts, which seems like a quick fix.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marica
5 months ago
Okay, let me break this down. High bureaucracy, lots of meetings, and micromanagement - that really screams power distance to me. I'm pretty confident that's the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
5 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the syntax rules for valid macros.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. The definition clearly states that a control objective is a desired result or purpose, so the answer must be True.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casandra
9 months ago
Triggers? Matching criteria? Nah, I'm going with Option B. Keeping it simple and using the standard features is the way to go. Less code, more productivity!
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
10 months ago
Option A looks good, but triggers can be tricky to maintain. I'd rather let Salesforce handle the duplicate detection for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lea
10 months ago
Haha, Option D with a custom matching criteria? That's like trying to reinvent the wheel. Why not use the tools Salesforce provides?
upvoted 0 times
Oliva
8 months ago
C) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to block for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
8 months ago
B) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to report and alert for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alishia
9 months ago
A) Create an after insert and update trigger on the account, contact and lead, and send an error if a duplicate is found using a custom matching criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Queen
10 months ago
I'd go with C. Blocking the user from creating duplicates is the best way to ensure data quality, even if it's a bit more restrictive.
upvoted 0 times
Rosendo
8 months ago
Agreed. It's better to be a bit more restrictive to maintain data integrity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aracelis
9 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. Preventing duplicates from being created in the first place is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
9 months ago
C) Create a duplicate rule for account, lead, and contact, use standard matching rules for these objects, and set the action to block for both creates and edits.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Buck
10 months ago
Option B seems like the way to go. Duplicate rules are a built-in feature, and using standard matching with report and alert is a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
Reynalda
8 months ago
Adell: Definitely, having a report and alert system will help Universal Containers address the problem quickly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Evette
8 months ago
User 3: It's important to have a system in place to catch duplicates before they cause data quality issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
8 months ago
User 2: Agreed, using duplicate rules with standard matching rules and alerts is a good starting point.
upvoted 0 times
...
Martina
9 months ago
User 1: I think option B is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phuong
9 months ago
User 4: Let's implement it quickly to improve our data quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giovanna
10 months ago
User 3: That way we can catch duplicates right away and take action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cortney
10 months ago
User 2: Agreed, duplicate rules with standard matching and alerts sound like a good plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
10 months ago
User 1: I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
10 months ago
That's a good point, Melissa. Triggers can definitely help in real-time prevention of duplicate records. UC should consider that as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more effective. By using triggers, UC can prevent duplicates from being created in the first place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
10 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. It will help UC identify duplicates and take action immediately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
That's a good point, Aron. Option A does provide real-time prevention of duplicates. It's a tough choice between the two options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more effective. By creating triggers with custom matching criteria, UC can prevent duplicates right at the point of creation or update.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
11 months ago
I think option B is the best approach. It will help UC identify and report duplicate records using standard matching rules.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel