Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Exam - Topic 10 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) exam

Question #: 29
Topic #: 10

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions]

Universal Containers has implemented Salesforce for its operations. In order for customers to be created in their MDM solution, the customer record needs to have the following attributes:

1. First Name

2. Last Name

3. Email

Which option should the data architect recommend to mandate this when customers are created in Salesforce?

AConfigure Page Layout marking attributes as required fields.

BCreate validation rules to check If the required attributes are entered.

CMark Fields for the attributes as required under Setup.

DBuild validation in Integration with MDM to check required attributes.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

Creating validation rules to check if the required attributes are entered is the best option to mandate this when customers are created in Salesforce. Validation rules allow you to specify criteria that must be met before a record can be saved. You can use validation rules to ensure that customers have a first name, last name, and email when they are created in Salesforce. This way, you can prevent incomplete or invalid data from being sent to your MDM solution.

by Maryann at Jan 24, 2024, 11:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Data Architect (Plat-Arch-201) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Isadora

3 months ago

Definitely need to go with Option D for MDM compliance.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elizabeth

3 months ago

Page Layouts (Option A) won't enforce it at the database level.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stefania

3 months ago

Wait, can you really enforce this through integration? Sounds tricky!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lon

4 months ago

I think validation rules (Option B) are more flexible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Yasuko

4 months ago

Option C is the best choice for required fields!

upvoted 0 times

...

Pedro

4 months ago

I practiced a similar question, and I think configuring the page layout might not enforce the requirement as strictly as needed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Candida

4 months ago

I feel like the integration option might be overkill for just ensuring those three fields are filled.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rene

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I remember something about validation rules being useful for checking required fields.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leonie

5 months ago

I think marking fields as required under Setup could be the simplest way to ensure those attributes are filled out.

upvoted 0 times

...

Milly

5 months ago

Configuring the page layout to mark the fields as required seems like the simplest solution, but I want to make sure that's the most robust approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Julio

5 months ago

Okay, I think the key here is to find the option that will most effectively mandate the required attributes. I'd probably go with creating validation rules to ensure the fields are populated.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karina

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I need to make sure I understand the requirements fully before deciding on the best solution.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katheryn

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward question. I'd start by looking at the options and thinking about the pros and cons of each approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jesusa

5 months ago

I'm leaning towards the validation rules option. That way, we can ensure the data is entered correctly without relying solely on the page layout.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nohemi

5 months ago

I'm a bit unsure about this one. Is the Local Admin role the right choice here? I'll need to double-check the permissions for each role.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmer

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused. Does require consuming all gas mean that the transaction is completely canceled or just partially?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

5 months ago

I think this statement might be true because utility services often focus more on engineering than on business analysis.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kati

2 years ago

Option A? More like 'Page Lay-back' amirite? *ba dum tss* Anyway, Option C is the way to go, no doubt about it.

upvoted 0 times

Rosina

2 years ago

Option A may sound tempting, but Option C is the way to go for sure.

upvoted 0 times

...

Bev

2 years ago

Yeah, marking fields as required under Setup is the most efficient way to mandate those attributes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Graciela

2 years ago

I agree, Option C is definitely the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ty

2 years ago

Option C? More like Option 'C' the light, am I right? *wink wink* Seriously though, it's the best choice for the job.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elfrieda

2 years ago

I'm all about efficiency, and option C just screams 'get it done!' No need to overcomplicate things, am I right?

upvoted 0 times

Martina

2 years ago

I agree, let's keep it simple with marking fields as required in Setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

2 years ago

Yeah, keeping it simple with marking fields as required is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Janey

2 years ago

I agree, no need to make things more complicated than they need to be.

upvoted 0 times

...

Huey

2 years ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Simple and effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tanja

2 years ago

Option C is definitely the way to go. Simple and effective.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cornell

2 years ago

You know, I was tempted to go with option B, but then I realized that's like building a lock on a door that's already open. Option C is the real deal!

upvoted 0 times