Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam CRT-403 Topic 9 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 9
[All CRT-403 Questions]

Universal Containers conduct evaluations of their sales reps using a custom object consisting of numerical scores and executive comments. The company wants to ensure that only the sales reps, and their manager's executive can view the rep's evaluation record but the reps should not be able to view the executive comment field on their review. How can these requirement be met?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

To allow quick editing of a record's status and entering a due date from the record's feed in the Salesforce Mobile App:

A . Custom action. This option enables users to perform specific tasks directly from the record page in the Salesforce Mobile App, such as editing fields.

Steps to create a custom action:

Navigate to Setup Object Manager select the relevant object.

Click Buttons, Links, and Actions New Action.

Set Action Type to 'Update a Record'.

Configure the action layout to include the Status and Custom Due Date fields.

Add the action to the Salesforce Mobile layout.

This setup provides an efficient way for users to update key fields without navigating away from the record feed.

For detailed setup instructions, see Salesforce's documentation on Creating Quick Actions.


by Melodie at May 22, 2024, 07:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Terrilyn
2 months ago
Option B caught my eye, but using custom settings and page layouts feels a bit overkill for this scenario. I'll stick with A or C.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 months ago
I agree, option C also seems like a good choice. Using hierarchy for record access and field-level security for managing field access sounds efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
1 months ago
I think option A makes more sense. Using hierarchy for record access and managing field access with field-level security seems like a simpler solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherilyn
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Keeping it simple with just hierarchy and field-level security sounds good to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
2 months ago
That's a good point, field-level security is crucial in this scenario. I might reconsider my answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisbeth
2 months ago
Option A looks like the way to go. Using hierarchy and field-level security seems the most straightforward approach to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Nell
12 days ago
I think managing field access with record types and field-level security is key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryl
13 days ago
It's important to make sure the executive comments are only visible to the managers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
1 months ago
Yeah, using hierarchy and field-level security would definitely help in restricting access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leah
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is C. It mentions managing field access with field-level security, which seems more relevant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
2 months ago
I think the answer is A, because it mentions managing field access with record types and field-level security.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel