Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CRT-403 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) uses a public sharing model for accounts. UMS would like to move to a more restrictive sharing model but wants the Sales team to continue to have access to all account records with the sales record type.Which two actions should an app builder complete to implement this change?Choose 2 answers
B) Update the organization-wide defaults and C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.
A) Update the Sales profile.
D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.

Salesforce CRT-403 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 5
[All CRT-403 Questions]

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) uses a public sharing model for accounts. UMS would like to move to a more restrictive sharing model but wants the Sales team to continue to have access to all account records with the sales record type.

Which two actions should an app builder complete to implement this change?

Choose 2 answers

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Update the organization-wide defaults and create a criteria based sharing rule are two actions that an app builder should complete to implement the change of moving to a more restrictive sharing model while allowing the Sales team to access all account records with the sales record type. Updating the organization-wide defaults can set the baseline level of access for accounts, and creating a criteria based sharing rule can grant additional access based on record type. Updating the Sales profile and creating an owner-based sharing rule are not necessary or sufficient actions for this change.


by Freeman at Jan 23, 2024, 07:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Theresia
10 months ago
Not sure if just updating profiles will cut it, seems too simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
10 months ago
Totally agree, those two steps make sense for the Sales team!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dannette
10 months ago
Wait, can the Sales team really access all records with just those changes?
upvoted 0 times
...
Yen
10 months ago
I think creating a criteria-based sharing rule is a must too!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dawne
10 months ago
Definitely need to update the organization-wide defaults.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emilio
10 months ago
I’m a bit confused about the owner-based sharing rule. Would that really help the Sales team access all accounts, or is it more for individual records?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
11 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to balance sharing settings. Updating the Sales profile could be part of the solution too, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerry
11 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I think creating a criteria-based sharing rule might be necessary to give the Sales team access to those specific records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavina
11 months ago
I remember we discussed how changing the organization-wide defaults could help restrict access while still allowing certain teams to see records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
11 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the key is to update the Sales profile to maintain access to the sales records, and then use the organization-wide defaults to restrict access to the other account records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pearly
11 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question says the Sales team needs to continue to have access to all account records with the sales record type, so I'm guessing we'll need to update the Sales profile and the organization-wide defaults to make that happen.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lon
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to restrict access, but I'm not sure if a criteria-based sharing rule or an owner-based sharing rule would be the right approach here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mary
11 months ago
This seems pretty straightforward. I think updating the Sales profile and the organization-wide defaults would be the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moira
11 months ago
This seems like a straightforward security question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the best way to protect access to the air conditioning equipment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
11 months ago
Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the Locker feature. I'll need to review the vRSLCM documentation to understand how it works and if it's the right solution for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
11 months ago
I'm pretty confident about this one. I know that application containers can contain a single application, and that they don't necessarily need an application seed PDB. I'll select the options that I'm sure about.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zoila
11 months ago
I think the summarization condition might need a specific route in place—like, maybe something related to option B seems familiar?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
2 years ago
Yeah, Quentin's got a point. Salesforce security can be a real headache, but at least they give us options like criteria-based and owner-based sharing rules to work with.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
2 years ago
C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
2 years ago
A) Update the Sales profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quentin
2 years ago
Haha, I bet the app builder is sweating bullets trying to figure out the best way to implement this change. Gotta love those tricky Salesforce security requirements!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
2 years ago
I agree with Ronna. C and D are the way to go. This will give the Sales team the required access without compromising the overall security of the system.
upvoted 0 times
Quentin
2 years ago
No, I think C and D are more appropriate in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
2 years ago
B) Update the organization-wide defaults
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 years ago
D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Almeta
2 years ago
A) Update the Sales profile.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elmer
2 years ago
I agree, that sounds like the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 years ago
D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 years ago
C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
2 years ago
C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marguerita
2 years ago
A and B don't seem to be the right choices here. Updating the Sales profile or the organization-wide defaults won't give the Sales team the specific access they need while limiting access for others.
upvoted 0 times
Cordell
2 years ago
Exactly. It's a more targeted approach to meet UMS's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavonna
2 years ago
That makes sense. And creating an owner-based sharing rule would ensure the Sales team has access to all account records with the sales record type.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
2 years ago
It might be, but it would allow for more control over who has access to the records.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
2 years ago
But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule be too specific?
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
2 years ago
D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
2 years ago
C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ronna
2 years ago
I think the correct answers are C and D. Creating a criteria-based sharing rule and an owner-based sharing rule will allow the Sales team to continue accessing all account records with the sales record type while restricting access for other users.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel