Salesforce CRT-403 Exam - Topic 5 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-403 exam

Question #: 34
Topic #: 5

Ursa Major Solar (UMS) uses a public sharing model for accounts. UMS would like to move to a more restrictive sharing model but wants the Sales team to continue to have access to all account records with the sales record type.

Which two actions should an app builder complete to implement this change?

Choose 2 answers

AUpdate the Sales profile.

BUpdate the organization-wide defaults

CCreate a criteria-based sharing rule.

DCreate an owner-based sharing rule.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, C

Update the organization-wide defaults and create a criteria based sharing rule are two actions that an app builder should complete to implement the change of moving to a more restrictive sharing model while allowing the Sales team to access all account records with the sales record type. Updating the organization-wide defaults can set the baseline level of access for accounts, and creating a criteria based sharing rule can grant additional access based on record type. Updating the Sales profile and creating an owner-based sharing rule are not necessary or sufficient actions for this change.

by Freeman at Jan 23, 2024, 07:19 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-403 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Theresia

3 months ago

Not sure if just updating profiles will cut it, seems too simple.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

3 months ago

Totally agree, those two steps make sense for the Sales team!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dannette

4 months ago

Wait, can the Sales team really access all records with just those changes?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yen

4 months ago

I think creating a criteria-based sharing rule is a must too!

upvoted 0 times

...

Dawne

4 months ago

Definitely need to update the organization-wide defaults.

upvoted 0 times

...

Emilio

4 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the owner-based sharing rule. Would that really help the Sales team access all accounts, or is it more for individual records?

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosendo

4 months ago

I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to balance sharing settings. Updating the Sales profile could be part of the solution too, right?

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I think creating a criteria-based sharing rule might be necessary to give the Sales team access to those specific records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavina

5 months ago

I remember we discussed how changing the organization-wide defaults could help restrict access while still allowing certain teams to see records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Erinn

5 months ago

I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. I think the key is to update the Sales profile to maintain access to the sales records, and then use the organization-wide defaults to restrict access to the other account records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pearly

5 months ago

Okay, let me think this through. The question says the Sales team needs to continue to have access to all account records with the sales record type, so I'm guessing we'll need to update the Sales profile and the organization-wide defaults to make that happen.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lon

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I know we need to restrict access, but I'm not sure if a criteria-based sharing rule or an owner-based sharing rule would be the right approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mary

5 months ago

This seems pretty straightforward. I think updating the Sales profile and the organization-wide defaults would be the way to go.

upvoted 0 times

...

Moira

5 months ago

This seems like a straightforward security question. I'll carefully read through the options and think about the best way to protect access to the air conditioning equipment.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jin

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm not too familiar with the Locker feature. I'll need to review the vRSLCM documentation to understand how it works and if it's the right solution for this scenario.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashleigh

5 months ago

I'm pretty confident about this one. I know that application containers can contain a single application, and that they don't necessarily need an application seed PDB. I'll select the options that I'm sure about.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zoila

5 months ago

I think the summarization condition might need a specific route in place—like, maybe something related to option B seems familiar?

upvoted 0 times

...

Kayleigh

2 years ago

Yeah, Quentin's got a point. Salesforce security can be a real headache, but at least they give us options like criteria-based and owner-based sharing rules to work with.

upvoted 0 times

Florinda

2 years ago

C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tamie

2 years ago

A) Update the Sales profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Quentin

2 years ago

Haha, I bet the app builder is sweating bullets trying to figure out the best way to implement this change. Gotta love those tricky Salesforce security requirements!

upvoted 0 times

...

Lamar

2 years ago

I agree with Ronna. C and D are the way to go. This will give the Sales team the required access without compromising the overall security of the system.

upvoted 0 times

Quentin

2 years ago

No, I think C and D are more appropriate in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lai

2 years ago

B) Update the organization-wide defaults

upvoted 0 times

...

Curt

2 years ago

D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Almeta

2 years ago

A) Update the Sales profile.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elmer

2 years ago

I agree, that sounds like the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Leontine

2 years ago

D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Filiberto

2 years ago

C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Arlette

2 years ago

C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Marguerita

2 years ago

A and B don't seem to be the right choices here. Updating the Sales profile or the organization-wide defaults won't give the Sales team the specific access they need while limiting access for others.

upvoted 0 times

Cordell

2 years ago

Exactly. It's a more targeted approach to meet UMS's requirements.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lavonna

2 years ago

That makes sense. And creating an owner-based sharing rule would ensure the Sales team has access to all account records with the sales record type.

upvoted 0 times

...

Honey

2 years ago

It might be, but it would allow for more control over who has access to the records.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnetta

2 years ago

But wouldn't creating a criteria-based sharing rule be too specific?

upvoted 0 times

...

Earleen

2 years ago

D) Create an owner-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

2 years ago

C) Create a criteria-based sharing rule.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronna

2 years ago

I think the correct answers are C and D. Creating a criteria-based sharing rule and an owner-based sharing rule will allow the Sales team to continue accessing all account records with the sales record type while restricting access for other users.

upvoted 0 times

...