MENU
Cloud Kicks (CK) wants to simultaneously delete a Supplier's record and all Supplier ltem__c records if a
partnership ends with a supplier.
What solution could an app builder use to meet the requirement?
Suggested Answer: B
Get Premium CRT-403 Questions
as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF
Real Exam Format
Detailed Explanations
Instant Access
Get Your Practice Test
48 comments · newest first
LY
Lynelle
11 months ago
Many-to-many won't work for this requirement, right?
CO
Coleen
11 months ago
Indirect lookup seems off for this scenario.
CA
Carin
12 months ago
Wait, can you really delete all related records like that?
JO
Jovita
12 months ago
Totally agree, D is the best option here.
OL
Olive
12 months ago
Master-detail is the way to go for cascading deletes!
MI
Millie
1 year ago
Hierarchical relationships seem more for user records, right? I doubt that's what they want for suppliers.
AN
Angella
1 year ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to delete related records, and I think the master-detail option was the answer there as well.
GL
Glory
1 year ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like indirect lookup could be relevant here too, especially if we're dealing with external objects.
RE
Renea
1 year ago
I remember studying about relationships in Salesforce, and I think a master-detail relationship might be the right choice since it allows for cascading deletes.
TH
Thomasena
1 year ago
The project statement of work is definitely the right answer. It's the key document that outlines the deliverables and scope of the project.
LU
Luz
1 year ago
I remember a practice question that involved different types of nav elements, and I think Utility makes the most sense here.
DO
Dorian
1 year ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. The options seem similar, so I'll need to review my notes on the rules of evidence to make sure I understand the differences.
SH
Shelton
1 year ago
D. Master-detail is the correct answer, no doubt about it. Now, if only I could remember the difference between a lookup and a master-detail relationship...
SH
Shawn
1 year ago
Lookup relationships are used when you don't want to cascade delete related records.
CO
Colton
1 year ago
Master-detail relationships are used when you want to cascade delete related records.
TO
Tony
1 year ago
D) Master-detail
DO
Domitila
1 year ago
C) Hierarchical
RA
Raina
1 year ago
B) Indirect lookup
DO
Donte
1 year ago
A) Many-to-many
KR
Krystina
1 year ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer is really hoping we don't choose A. Many-to-many. That would just be a mess to try and delete everything at once!
ME
Melodie
1 year ago
User 3: Definitely not A) Many-to-many, that would be a nightmare to manage.
CE
Celia
1 year ago
User 2: Yeah, that makes sense. It would allow for cascading deletes.
EA
Earleen
1 year ago
User 1: I think the best solution would be D) Master-detail.
KA
Kate
1 year ago
Hmm, I was considering B. Indirect lookup, but I guess that wouldn't work since we need to delete the records simultaneously. D. Master-detail is the way to go.
LU
Luisa
1 year ago
Yes, Master-detail relationship allows for cascading deletes which is perfect for this requirement.
DE
Deandrea
1 year ago
I agree, with Master-detail relationship, we can easily delete the related records at the same time.
JA
Janine
1 year ago
I think D. Master-detail is the best solution for this scenario.
SA
Salome
2 years ago
I think the answer is D. Master-detail. It makes sense to use this relationship type to delete the Supplier and all Supplier Item records together.
EL
Eliseo
1 year ago
I think D) Master-detail is the most suitable relationship type for this requirement.
EL
Eladia
1 year ago
Yes, D) Master-detail is the best option for this scenario.
FE
Felicidad
1 year ago
I agree, D) Master-detail is the correct choice.
GL
Gladys
1 year ago
D) Master-detail
LE
Lenna
1 year ago
C) Hierarchical
DA
Daniel
1 year ago
B) Indirect lookup
NG
Nguyet
1 year ago
A) Many-to-many
MA
Mammie
1 year ago
That makes sense, D) Master-detail is the best option for this requirement.
HO
Hollis
1 year ago
Yes, D) Master-detail ensures that all related records are deleted when the parent record is deleted.
CR
Cristy
1 year ago
I agree, D) Master-detail is the correct choice.
LE
Leslee
1 year ago
D) Master-detail
AP
Apolonia
1 year ago
C) Hierarchical
TE
Tegan
1 year ago
B) Indirect lookup
RO
Robt
1 year ago
A) Many-to-many
DA
Dahlia
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Many-to-many could also work if we set up a junction object to link the Supplier and Supplier Item records.
TR
Truman
2 years ago
I agree with Marion, because with Master-detail relationship, when the parent record is deleted, all related child records are also deleted.
MA
Marion
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Master-detail.
LA
Lashawna
2 years ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Many-to-many could also work because it allows for deletion of related records.
DA
Dana
2 years ago
I agree with Lisbeth, because with Master-detail relationship, when the parent record is deleted, all related child records are also deleted.
LI
Lisbeth
2 years ago
I think the answer is D) Master-detail.