New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce CRT-250 Exam - Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CRT-250 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All CRT-250 Questions]

A Marketing Cloud admin at a bank is asked to avoid storing sensitive data in the

cloud. This data will only be sent to Marketing cloud to execute a send.

Which feature would the admin use to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Leigha at Dec 09, 2024, 06:38 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRT-250 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Natalie
3 months ago
Distributed Marketing Sends? That doesn't sound right at all.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
3 months ago
Field Level Encryption could also work, but not as efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charolette
3 months ago
Wait, can we really trust tokenization completely?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
4 months ago
I agree, it's the best way to keep data safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sina
4 months ago
Definitely Tokenized Sending for this!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jutta
4 months ago
Distributed Marketing Sends sounds familiar, but I don't think it specifically deals with sensitive data storage. I might lean towards tokenized sending based on what I recall.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question about data handling, and I think list sending doesn't really address the sensitive data issue. It just uses existing lists, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
4 months ago
I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like field level encryption could also be relevant here. It seems like it protects data, but I'm not clear if it applies to sending.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
5 months ago
I remember studying about data security in Marketing Cloud, and I think tokenized sending might be the right choice since it helps avoid storing sensitive data directly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused on this one. Is Field Level Encryption another option that could work? I'll need to review the differences between the features to decide which one is best for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
5 months ago
Tokenized Sending sounds like the right approach here. It lets you send the data to Marketing Cloud without actually storing it there, which is exactly what the question is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. I know we need to avoid storing sensitive data in the cloud, but I'm not familiar with all the different features in Marketing Cloud. I'll have to think this through carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
5 months ago
I think the answer is Tokenized Sending. That feature allows you to send data to Marketing Cloud without storing the sensitive information there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlee
1 year ago
Hey, you know what they say - if you can't take the heat, get out of the cloud! Field Level Encryption is the way to go, folks.
upvoted 0 times
Jill
1 year ago
Tokenized Sending could also be a good choice to ensure data security during sends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
1 year ago
I agree, it's important to protect that information, especially in a bank setting.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
1 year ago
Field Level Encryption is definitely the best option for keeping sensitive data safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Naomi
1 year ago
That's true, Tokenized Sending could also be a valid choice for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
1 year ago
But wouldn't Tokenized Sending also be a good option to avoid storing sensitive data?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
1 year ago
I agree with Naomi, Field Level Encryption would keep the sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Naomi
1 year ago
I think the admin should use Field Level Encryption.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
Distributed Marketing Sends? More like 'Distributed my brain cells', am I right? Field Level Encryption is the clear winner here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
1 year ago
List Sending? Psh, that's so 2010. Field Level Encryption is where it's at, my friend. Hacker-proof, I tell ya!
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 year ago
I agree, List Sending is outdated. Field Level Encryption provides an extra layer of security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alesia
1 year ago
Field Level Encryption is definitely the way to go. Can't be too careful with sensitive data.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brett
1 year ago
Tokenized Sending sounds pretty fancy, but I don't think it's the right fit here. Gotta keep that sensitive data under lock and key!
upvoted 0 times
...
Coral
1 year ago
Ooh, this is a tricky one! I'd say Field Level Encryption is the way to go. Keeps the data secure without any funny business.
upvoted 0 times
Edelmira
1 year ago
List Sending wouldn't be the best choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaynell
1 year ago
Distributed Marketing Sends is not the right feature to use for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephaine
1 year ago
I've used Field Level Encryption before, it's a reliable choice for keeping data safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
1 year ago
Tokenized Sending could also work, but I agree that Field Level Encryption is more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chau
1 year ago
Yeah, that would definitely keep the sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
1 year ago
Tokenized Sending could also work, but I think Field Level Encryption is more secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Polly
1 year ago
I think Field Level Encryption is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
1 year ago
I agree, Field Level Encryption is the best option for keeping sensitive data secure.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel