New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CPQ-301 Exam - Topic 7 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CPQ-301 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 7
[All CPQ-301 Questions]

Universal Containers wants to introduce a new Support SKU to be sold in increments of 1 month. The product is non-renewable but the support agreement can be canceled before the agreed End Date.

What should the admin configure in the product to meet this requirement?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Sage
3 months ago
Totally agree with B, it makes the most sense here!
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
3 months ago
Wait, renewable for a non-renewable product? That doesn't add up!
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
3 months ago
C is interesting, but does it really fit the non-renewable aspect?
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherry
4 months ago
I think A is the way to go, no subscription type needed!
upvoted 0 times
...
Gaston
4 months ago
Option B seems right, it's a one-time product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
4 months ago
I feel like I might be mixing up the fields. I thought we needed to use Quantity for defining the months, but I can't remember if it should be on the QuoteLine or Quote record.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilbert
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to configure a product for a one-time service. I think setting SubscriptionPricing to None could be the key, which makes me consider option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Winifred
4 months ago
I’m a bit unsure about the difference between SubscriptionType and SubscriptionTerm. I think we might need to set SubscriptionType to One-Time for this scenario, which makes me lean towards option B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
5 months ago
I remember that for non-renewable products, we shouldn't set the SubscriptionType to Renewable, so I think D is definitely not right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micheline
5 months ago
This seems straightforward. I'll go with option B - set the SubscriptionType to One-Time and use the SubscriptionTerm field on the quote to define the support duration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
5 months ago
I'm a bit confused by all the different subscription-related fields. Let me re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
5 months ago
Hmm, I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check the details on the subscription fields. Better not to guess on this type of question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the product configuration options to determine the right approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The key is setting the SubscriptionType field correctly on the product. Then I can use the Quantity field on the quote line to specify the support duration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Diego
5 months ago
Okay, I've got this. The scenario describes a process where a user's identity is propagated from the login to the web service, which is a key aspect of single sign-on. I'm confident that the answer is B.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
5 months ago
I feel pretty confident about this. Based on my knowledge of the vulnerability management system, the role that can view the Vulnerability Overview Dashboard is sn_vul.vulnerability.read.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberely
5 months ago
I remember there being a question about provider manuals in practice exams, and I think they also help in improving operations for providers. But I'm not entirely sure if that's their primary purpose.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
5 months ago
I have a vague memory of discussing these in relation to service models, but I can't quite recall. Could they possibly be part of that too?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kelvin
5 months ago
Ah, I've covered this topic in my studies. The key objective is to identify test conditions and create test cases, so I'll go with option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavelle
9 months ago
Hold up, did they really use 'SBQQ' in all those field names? Seriously, Salesforce, get it together with your naming conventions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lakeesha
9 months ago
Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going to go with option C and set the SBQQ__SubscriptionPricing__c field to None. That way, I can use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the Quote Line to handle the support months.
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
8 months ago
Definitely. Option C simplifies the process and ensures that the support agreement can be easily managed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Derick
9 months ago
I agree. It's important to keep it simple and easy to understand for both the admin and the customer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
9 months ago
That makes sense. Option C seems like the most straightforward way to handle the support increments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
9 months ago
I think option C is the best choice. Setting the SBQQ__SubscriptionPricing__c field to None allows us to use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the Quote Line for the support months.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lou
10 months ago
Haha, I'm going with option D. Who doesn't love a good 'Renewable' subscription? Plus, the SBQQ__SubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record sounds like a fun way to define the support duration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reyes
10 months ago
I think option B is the way to go. Setting the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c field to One-Time and using the SBQQ__SubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record seems to meet the requirements.
upvoted 0 times
Florinda
8 months ago
Yes, using the SubscriptionTerm field on the Quote record would allow for the flexibility needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johnetta
8 months ago
I think so too, setting the SubscriptionType to One-Time makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
9 months ago
I agree, option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benedict
10 months ago
I disagree. I think option B is the correct configuration for the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Han
10 months ago
I agree with Gilma. Option A seems to be the best choice for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
10 months ago
I think the admin should configure the product with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosina
10 months ago
Option A seems to be the correct answer. We can set the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c and SBQQ__AssetConversion__c fields to Null and use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the QuoteLine to define the number of months.
upvoted 0 times
Frankie
9 months ago
User 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
9 months ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Fatima
9 months ago
That makes sense. Using the Quantity field on the QuoteLine record will allow us to define the number of months of Support.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
10 months ago
I agree, Option A is the correct choice. We can set the SubscriptionType and AssetConversion fields to Null.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ena
11 months ago
But option A allows for non-renewable support agreements, which is what the requirement is asking for.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alexia
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is the correct configuration for the product.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
11 months ago
I think the admin should configure the product with option A.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel