Discuss Salesforce CPQ-301 Exam Topic 7 Question 36

Universal Containers wants to introduce a new Support SKU to be sold in increments of 1 month. The product is non-renewable but the support agreement can be canceled before the agreed End Date.

What should the admin configure in the product to meet this requirement?

AWhen creating the Product record, the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c field and theSBQQ__AssetConversion__c field are set to Null. Use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the QuoteLine record to define the number of months of Support requested by the customer.

BA When creating the Product record, the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c field is set to One-Time. Use theSBQQ__SubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record to define the number of months of Supportrequested by the customer.

CWhen creating the Product record, the SBQQ__SubscriptionPricing__c field is set to None. Use theSBQQ__Quantity__c field on the Quote Line record to define the number of months of Supportrequested by the customer.

DWhen creating the Product record, the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c field is set to Renewable. Usethe SBQQ__5ubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record to define the number of months ofSupport requested by the customer.

Suggested Answer: B

Get Premium CPQ-301 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test

41 comments · newest first

Sage 11 months ago

Totally agree with B, it makes the most sense here!

Torie 11 months ago

Wait, renewable for a non-renewable product? That doesn't add up!

Elli 12 months ago

C is interesting, but does it really fit the non-renewable aspect?

Cherry 12 months ago

I think A is the way to go, no subscription type needed!

Gaston 1 year ago

Option B seems right, it's a one-time product.

Silva 1 year ago

I feel like I might be mixing up the fields. I thought we needed to use Quantity for defining the months, but I can't remember if it should be on the QuoteLine or Quote record.

Gilbert 1 year ago

I practiced a similar question where we had to configure a product for a one-time service. I think setting SubscriptionPricing to None could be the key, which makes me consider option C.

Winifred 1 year ago

I’m a bit unsure about the difference between SubscriptionType and SubscriptionTerm. I think we might need to set SubscriptionType to One-Time for this scenario, which makes me lean towards option B.

Candra 1 year ago

I remember that for non-renewable products, we shouldn't set the SubscriptionType to Renewable, so I think D is definitely not right.

Micheline 1 year ago

This seems straightforward. I'll go with option B - set the SubscriptionType to One-Time and use the SubscriptionTerm field on the quote to define the support duration.

Marvel 1 year ago

I'm a bit confused by all the different subscription-related fields. Let me re-read the question and options carefully to make sure I understand the requirements.

Shantell 1 year ago

Hmm, I think I know the answer, but I want to double-check the details on the subscription fields. Better not to guess on this type of question.

Raylene 1 year ago

This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully review the product configuration options to determine the right approach.

Fanny 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The key is setting the SubscriptionType field correctly on the product. Then I can use the Quantity field on the quote line to specify the support duration.

Diego 1 year ago

Okay, I've got this. The scenario describes a process where a user's identity is propagated from the login to the web service, which is a key aspect of single sign-on. I'm confident that the answer is B.

Lorean 1 year ago

I feel pretty confident about this. Based on my knowledge of the vulnerability management system, the role that can view the Vulnerability Overview Dashboard is sn_vul.vulnerability.read.

Kimberely 1 year ago

I remember there being a question about provider manuals in practice exams, and I think they also help in improving operations for providers. But I'm not entirely sure if that's their primary purpose.

Oliva 1 year ago

I have a vague memory of discussing these in relation to service models, but I can't quite recall. Could they possibly be part of that too?

Kelvin 1 year ago

Ah, I've covered this topic in my studies. The key objective is to identify test conditions and create test cases, so I'll go with option C.

Lavelle 1 year ago

Hold up, did they really use 'SBQQ' in all those field names? Seriously, Salesforce, get it together with your naming conventions!

Lakeesha 1 year ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I'm going to go with option C and set the SBQQ__SubscriptionPricing__c field to None. That way, I can use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the Quote Line to handle the support months.

Blondell 1 year ago

↳ replying to Lakeesha

Definitely. Option C simplifies the process and ensures that the support agreement can be easily managed.

Derick 1 year ago

↳ replying to Lakeesha

I agree. It's important to keep it simple and easy to understand for both the admin and the customer.

Dylan 1 year ago

↳ replying to Lakeesha

That makes sense. Option C seems like the most straightforward way to handle the support increments.

Natalie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Lakeesha

I think option C is the best choice. Setting the SBQQ__SubscriptionPricing__c field to None allows us to use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the Quote Line for the support months.

Lou 1 year ago

Haha, I'm going with option D. Who doesn't love a good 'Renewable' subscription? Plus, the SBQQ__SubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record sounds like a fun way to define the support duration.

Reyes 1 year ago

I think option B is the way to go. Setting the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c field to One-Time and using the SBQQ__SubscriptionTerm__c field on the Quote record seems to meet the requirements.

Florinda 1 year ago

↳ replying to Reyes

Yes, using the SubscriptionTerm field on the Quote record would allow for the flexibility needed.

Johnetta 1 year ago

↳ replying to Reyes

I think so too, setting the SubscriptionType to One-Time makes sense.

Emmanuel 1 year ago

↳ replying to Reyes

I agree, option B seems like the best choice for this scenario.

Benedict 2 years ago

I disagree. I think option B is the correct configuration for the product.

Han 2 years ago

I agree with Gilma. Option A seems to be the best choice for this requirement.

Gilma 2 years ago

I think the admin should configure the product with option A.

Rosina 2 years ago

Option A seems to be the correct answer. We can set the SBQQ__SubscriptionType__c and SBQQ__AssetConversion__c fields to Null and use the SBQQ__Quantity__c field on the QuoteLine to define the number of months.

Frankie 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rosina

User 2

Felicidad 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rosina

User 1

Fatima 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rosina

That makes sense. Using the Quantity field on the QuoteLine record will allow us to define the number of months of Support.

Arthur 1 year ago

↳ replying to Rosina

I agree, Option A is the correct choice. We can set the SubscriptionType and AssetConversion fields to Null.

Ena 2 years ago

But option A allows for non-renewable support agreements, which is what the requirement is asking for.

Alexia 2 years ago

I disagree, I believe option B is the correct configuration for the product.

Ena 2 years ago

I think the admin should configure the product with option A.

Salesforce CPQ-301 Exam - Topic 7 Question 36 Discussion