Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Exam - Topic 3 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) exam

Question #: 49
Topic #: 3

[All Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions]

A strategy designer is working with a team to assess and prioritize potential opportunities for an upcoming product release using the Design

Thinking methodology.

Which next step should the designer recommend to assist with prioritization?

ASurvey users and prioritize building their most desired features.

BAnalyze the feature feasibility and let technology drive future designs.

CTest for desirability and refine ideas based on feasibility

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

In the Design Thinking process, testing for desirability ensures that ideas meet user needs and preferences. Refining these ideas based on feasibility takes into account the practical aspects of implementation, ensuring that the prioritized opportunities are both desirable to users and achievable by the team.

by Mari at Jul 08, 2025, 06:01 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified Platform Strategy Designer (Plat-UX-102) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Tommy

2 months ago

Surprised that people aren't leaning towards C more!

upvoted 0 times

...

Paola

3 months ago

Feasibility should come first, right? Option B seems off.

upvoted 0 times

...

Domonique

3 months ago

But isn’t it risky to prioritize based on user surveys alone?

upvoted 0 times

...

Trina

3 months ago

Totally agree, testing for desirability is key!

upvoted 0 times

...

Kasandra

3 months ago

I think option C makes the most sense!

upvoted 0 times

...

Ilene

3 months ago

I vaguely recall something about testing ideas before committing to features, so C might be the best approach here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Judy

4 months ago

I think C sounds right because it combines desirability and feasibility, which is what we practiced in our last workshop.

upvoted 0 times

...

Doretha

4 months ago

I'm not entirely sure, but I feel like analyzing feasibility first might lead to better designs later. So maybe B makes sense?

upvoted 0 times

...

Yan

4 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of user feedback in prioritization, so I think A could be a good choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Florinda

4 months ago

I'm leaning towards option B here. I think it's important to let the technology drive the design, rather than just focusing on user desires. After all, we need to build something that's actually possible to implement. But I can see the merits of option C as well. Tough call.

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudia

4 months ago

Okay, I've got this. The question is asking about prioritizing opportunities, so we need to consider both what users want and what's actually feasible to build. Option C seems to hit that sweet spot - test for desirability and then refine based on feasibility. Feels like the most well-rounded approach to me.

upvoted 0 times

...

Denny

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. I know Design Thinking emphasizes user needs, but I'm not sure if just surveying users is the best approach. Maybe option C is the way to go, but I'll have to think it through a bit more.

upvoted 0 times

...

Derrick

5 months ago

This seems like a pretty straightforward Design Thinking question. I think the key is to focus on desirability and feasibility, so I'd go with option C.

upvoted 0 times

...