Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 10 Question 63 Discussion

Posted by Aretha on Apr 07, 2025 at 02:35 AM

The following code ensures that an address ID CANNOT be used if it is already in use by another address in the customer's address book. There is a problem with the code. The error message for an invalid address ID is never shown to the user on the form field.

How should the Digital Developer resolve this issue so that the error message is displayed on the address ID form field?

Suggested Answer: D

Get Premium CCM-101 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF Real Exam Format Detailed Explanations Instant Access Get Your Practice Test
39 comments · newest first
KA
Kassandra 10 months ago
Not sure about B, seems off to me.
CA
Catalina 11 months ago
I think A is the right choice.
GI
Gilma 11 months ago
Option C looks correct to me.
SH
Shantell 11 months ago
Wait, is D even a valid syntax?
LA
Laticia 11 months ago
I agree with C, it makes the most sense.
FE
Felicidad 11 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I feel like I might be mixing up the method names. I need to double-check how to call the invalidate function correctly.
AD
Adell 12 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to show error messages, and I feel like we used a method that directly referenced the form element. Maybe it's option A?
HU
Hui 12 months ago
I think option C looks familiar. It seems like the right way to call the method with the address ID, but I can't recall if the syntax is exactly right.
VA
Valentin 1 year ago
I remember we discussed how to properly invalidate form elements in class, but I'm not sure if it's `invalidateFormElement` or something else.
BR
Brittani 1 year ago
This seems straightforward enough. I think option C is the way to go - it directly calls the invalidateFormElement method on the addressid field.
AS
Ashleigh 1 year ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'll need to double-check the syntax and make sure I understand how to properly invalidate the form element.
MA
Marcos 1 year ago
Okay, I see the issue now. The code needs to invalidate the specific form element, not just set a property. I'm leaning towards option C as the best solution.
HO
Honey 1 year ago
Hmm, the error message not being displayed is definitely a problem. I think I'll try option A first, as it seems to directly address invalidating the form element.
VI
Vinnie 1 year ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and understand the issue before attempting to solve it.
JU
Julio 1 year ago
Wait, did they really forget to display the error message? That's like Digital Developer 101, folks!
AD
Adolph 1 year ago
I'm going with C. Seems like the most straightforward way to invalidate the form element and display the error message.
PA
Patrick 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adolph
User4: Good idea, let's use option C to display the error message.
LU
Luisa 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adolph
User3: Yeah, that makes sense. Let's go with C.
EL
Elli 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adolph
User2: I agree, it seems like the most straightforward solution.
IS
Isaac 1 year ago
↳ replying to Adolph
User1: I think option C is the best choice.
GU
Gussie 1 year ago
D looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to go about it. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
RI
Rickie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
I think C is the correct option to display the error message on the address ID form field.
VE
Vesta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
C) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid);
JO
Jordan 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\');
EU
Eun 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
D looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to go about it. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
RE
Rebbecca 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
C) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid);
KA
Kathrine 1 year ago
↳ replying to Gussie
A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\');
SU
Sue 2 years ago
Haha, the developers must have been a bit distracted while coding this one. But hey, at least they're trying to catch those address ID conflicts!
OL
Olen 1 year ago
↳ replying to Sue
User 3: Yeah, it seems like the most logical choice to display the error message.
AI
Aileen 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sue
User 2: Maybe option A would work to invalidate the form element.
MA
Marvel 2 years ago
↳ replying to Sue
User 1: They definitely need to fix that error message issue.
IV
Ivette 2 years ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A is the best choice because it directly targets the address ID form field.
CA
Catarina 2 years ago
I think the answer is C. The method 'invalidateFormElement' should be called on the form object, passing the field name as an argument.
LO
Louann 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catarina
Exactly, that's the right way to resolve the issue.
GO
Goldie 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catarina
So, it should be addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid).
AL
Aleta 1 year ago
↳ replying to Catarina
Yes, you are correct. The method should be called on the form object with the field name.
LY
Lynda 2 years ago
↳ replying to Catarina
I think the answer is C.
TO
Torie 2 years ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) addressForm.addresssid.invalidateFormElement(). It makes more sense to me.
IV
Ivette 2 years ago
I think the correct answer is A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\'). It seems like the most logical solution.
0/2000 characters

Save Cancel