New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce CCM-101 Exam - Topic 10 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's CCM-101 exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 10
[All CCM-101 Questions]

The following code ensures that an address ID CANNOT be used if it is already in use by another address in the customer's address book. There is a problem with the code. The error message for an invalid address ID is never shown to the user on the form field.

How should the Digital Developer resolve this issue so that the error message is displayed on the address ID form field?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Kassandra
2 months ago
Not sure about B, seems off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catalina
2 months ago
I think A is the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
3 months ago
Option C looks correct to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shantell
3 months ago
Wait, is D even a valid syntax?
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
3 months ago
I agree with C, it makes the most sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
3 months ago
I'm leaning towards option D, but I feel like I might be mixing up the method names. I need to double-check how to call the invalidate function correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
3 months ago
I practiced a similar question where we had to show error messages, and I feel like we used a method that directly referenced the form element. Maybe it's option A?
upvoted 0 times
...
Hui
4 months ago
I think option C looks familiar. It seems like the right way to call the method with the address ID, but I can't recall if the syntax is exactly right.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
4 months ago
I remember we discussed how to properly invalidate form elements in class, but I'm not sure if it's `invalidateFormElement` or something else.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
4 months ago
This seems straightforward enough. I think option C is the way to go - it directly calls the invalidateFormElement method on the addressid field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
4 months ago
I'm a bit confused by the different options here. I'll need to double-check the syntax and make sure I understand how to properly invalidate the form element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marcos
4 months ago
Okay, I see the issue now. The code needs to invalidate the specific form element, not just set a property. I'm leaning towards option C as the best solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Honey
5 months ago
Hmm, the error message not being displayed is definitely a problem. I think I'll try option A first, as it seems to directly address invalidating the form element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vinnie
5 months ago
This looks like a tricky one. I'll need to carefully read through the code and understand the issue before attempting to solve it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
9 months ago
Wait, did they really forget to display the error message? That's like Digital Developer 101, folks!
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
9 months ago
I'm going with C. Seems like the most straightforward way to invalidate the form element and display the error message.
upvoted 0 times
Patrick
9 months ago
User4: Good idea, let's use option C to display the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
9 months ago
User3: Yeah, that makes sense. Let's go with C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elli
9 months ago
User2: I agree, it seems like the most straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
9 months ago
User1: I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gussie
10 months ago
D looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to go about it. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
upvoted 0 times
Rickie
8 months ago
I think C is the correct option to display the error message on the address ID form field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
9 months ago
C) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid);
upvoted 0 times
...
Jordan
9 months ago
A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\');
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
9 months ago
D looks promising, but I'm not sure if that's the right way to go about it. Gotta love these tricky certification questions!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebbecca
9 months ago
C) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid);
upvoted 0 times
...
Kathrine
10 months ago
A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\');
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sue
10 months ago
Haha, the developers must have been a bit distracted while coding this one. But hey, at least they're trying to catch those address ID conflicts!
upvoted 0 times
Olen
10 months ago
User 3: Yeah, it seems like the most logical choice to display the error message.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
10 months ago
User 2: Maybe option A would work to invalidate the form element.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
10 months ago
User 1: They definitely need to fix that error message issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ivette
10 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. But I still think option A is the best choice because it directly targets the address ID form field.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catarina
10 months ago
I think the answer is C. The method 'invalidateFormElement' should be called on the form object, passing the field name as an argument.
upvoted 0 times
Louann
9 months ago
Exactly, that's the right way to resolve the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
10 months ago
So, it should be addressForm.invalidateFormElement(addressForm.addressid).
upvoted 0 times
...
Aleta
10 months ago
Yes, you are correct. The method should be called on the form object with the field name.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynda
10 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Torie
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) addressForm.addresssid.invalidateFormElement(). It makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is A) addressForm.invalidateFormElement(\'addressid\'). It seems like the most logical solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel