Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Exam - Topic 7 Question 43 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) exam

Question #: 43
Topic #: 7

[All Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Questions]

A company actively uses CI/CO processes for their Service Cloud implementation and is adding Marketing Cloud and Marketing Cloud Connect to their architecture. Under the current setup each developer has their own developer sandbox for development. Developers merge their changes into a sandbox for QA regularly, then once every week changes are moved to staging, and from staging to production instances.

Which set up should a Solution Architect propose to support this development approach considering costs and data segregation?

ASet up one Marketing Cloud instance with a business unit for production and one business unit for testing that is connected to all Developer sandboxes

BSet up one Marketing Cloud instance for testing and one for production, where the testing instance is connected to the staging sandbox

CSet up one Marketing Cloud instance for each sandbox in Service Cloud

DSet up one Marketing Cloud instance for production and create a Marketing Cloud sandbox to connect to each of the Service Cloud sandboxes

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Aja at May 05, 2022, 05:42 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Meghann

4 months ago

Wait, are we really considering multiple instances for each sandbox? That's wild!

upvoted 0 times

...

Velda

4 months ago

D is interesting, but how does it handle data segregation?

upvoted 0 times

...

Madonna

4 months ago

C sounds like overkill, too many instances!

upvoted 0 times

...

Helga

4 months ago

I disagree, B offers better separation for testing.

upvoted 0 times

...

Joni

4 months ago

Option A seems cost-effective with business units.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kirby

5 months ago

I have a hunch that option C could lead to unnecessary complexity with too many instances. I think we should focus on minimizing costs while ensuring proper testing environments.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

5 months ago

I'm a bit confused about the differences between options A and D. Both mention connecting to sandboxes, but I feel like D might offer better control over production data.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melynda

5 months ago

I think we practiced a similar question where we had to choose between multiple instances and business units. If I recall correctly, having separate instances can complicate things, so maybe B is a better choice?

upvoted 0 times

...

Carin

5 months ago

I remember we discussed the importance of data segregation in our CI/CD practices. Option D seems to align with that principle, but I'm not entirely sure about the cost implications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Brock

5 months ago

Whoa, this is a lot of OSPF-specific information to parse. I'm a bit lost on the technical details here. I'll need to review my OSPF knowledge to have a better chance at solving this.

upvoted 0 times

...

Chuck

5 months ago

Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to carefully review the options and think through the critical elements of a highly available SAN design.

upvoted 0 times

...

Fabiola

5 months ago

Okay, let's see here. The key information is that the neighbor is stuck in 2WAY state, which means the OSPF adjacency is not fully established. Based on the options, I'd say the most likely cause is a mismatch in OSPF parameters like the Area ID or hello interval between R2 and 10.1.5.5.

upvoted 0 times

...

Magda

5 months ago

Okay, I see what they're getting at here. I think option D, checking user input against a list of reserved database terms, could also be a good approach. That way you can catch any attempts to inject malicious database commands.

upvoted 0 times

...