Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Exam - Topic 5 Question 31 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) exam

Question #: 31
Topic #: 5

[All Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Questions]

Northern Trail Outfitters (NTO) wants to consolidate various legacy commerce platforms into one centrally-managed platform on B2C Commerce. The IT department has been working extensively with web frameworks (such as React and Angular) in recent years and wants to leverage the benefits of B2C Commerce, but maintain the flexibility of the user experience using headless commerce.

Which three considerations, beyond user experience, should a Solution Architect consider before confirming a headless approach?

Choose 3 answers

AAdditional infrastructure (for example Heroku servers) may be required to host the application

BFeatures that are available by default in the Storefront Reference Architecture (SFRA) app will need to be custom built in custom frameworks

CDevelopers will still be required to use the Commerce SDK for security purposes

DAvailable Service, Marketing, and LINK accelerators may not work without modifications when using a headless approach

EDevelopers familiar with the web frameworks (React, Angular) will be familiar with the framework used by B2C Commerce

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B, D, E

by Delisa at May 06, 2022, 10:26 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2C Solution Architect (Arch-302) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Daron

4 months ago

Good point, but I think React devs will adapt quickly to B2C Commerce.

upvoted 0 times

...

Larue

4 months ago

Yeah, those accelerators might need tweaks for headless.

upvoted 0 times

...

Talia

4 months ago

Wait, are we sure the Commerce SDK is still necessary?

upvoted 0 times

...

Annett

4 months ago

Totally agree, custom features can be a pain to build!

upvoted 0 times

...

Mica

4 months ago

A headless approach might need extra infrastructure like Heroku.

upvoted 0 times

...

Rosita

5 months ago

I definitely remember that available services and accelerators might need modifications for headless. It’s something we should keep in mind to avoid surprises later on.

upvoted 0 times

...

Verona

5 months ago

I’m a bit confused about the Commerce SDK. I feel like we mentioned it in class, but I can’t recall if it’s mandatory for security in a headless setup.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hillary

5 months ago

I think we talked about how some features in SFRA might need to be custom built if we go headless. That seems like a big consideration since it could increase development time.

upvoted 0 times

...

Germaine

5 months ago

I remember discussing how additional infrastructure might be necessary for hosting when going headless. It makes sense, but I’m not entirely sure what specific requirements we’d face.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cathrine

5 months ago

Okay, let me see if I can break this down. I think it has something to do with the number of sites and the configuration of the appliances.

upvoted 0 times

...

Georgene

5 months ago

I think I know the answer to this one. The key is that in a yield-maintenance agreement, the repurchased securities are priced to have the same yield as the original securities, even if they have different stated interest rates.

upvoted 0 times

...

Maryrose

5 months ago

I feel confident that the answer is C - information. The question is specifically talking about an asset that needs to be protected, and information is a key asset for any business.

upvoted 0 times

...