Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Exam - Topic 4 Question 99 Discussion

A Digital Developer is working on a project to convert a pipeline to a JavaScript controller. UX Studio has a functioning pipeline debugger configured for the site. Assume the Developer will add a breakpoint to the controller when it is written.What must be done in order to use the debugger with the new controller when it is written?
C) Modify the debugger configuration and use the existing pipeline debugger.
A) Create and use a new script debug configuration.
B) Use the existing pipeline debugger.
D) Create and use a new controller debug configuration.

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Exam - Topic 4 Question 99 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Developer (Comm-Dev-101) exam
Question #: 99
Topic #: 4
[All Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Questions]

A Digital Developer is working on a project to convert a pipeline to a JavaScript controller. UX Studio has a functioning pipeline debugger configured for the site. Assume the Developer will add a breakpoint to the controller when it is written.

What must be done in order to use the debugger with the new controller when it is written?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by Tomoko at Jan 05, 2026, 05:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Submit Cancel
Tu
4 months ago
I lean towards creating a new controller debug configuration for clarity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassi
4 months ago
Using the existing pipeline debugger could work too, but it might not be optimal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherell
4 months ago
I feel like modifying the existing debugger configuration makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
5 months ago
I think we need to create a new script debug configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashaunda
5 months ago
I agree, modifying the existing config sounds like the best option!
upvoted 0 times
...
Daryl
5 months ago
Wait, can we really use the old debugger? That seems off.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rasheeda
5 months ago
Definitely need a new controller debug configuration for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
5 months ago
I think using the existing pipeline debugger is enough.
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
5 months ago
Gotta create a new script debug configuration, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
6 months ago
This question is as clear as mud. Where's the option for "Summon the debugging fairy"?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
6 months ago
B) Use the existing pipeline debugger. Why reinvent the wheel, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
6 months ago
D) Create and use a new controller debug configuration. Sounds like a job for a real code wizard!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamesha
7 months ago
C) Modify the debugger configuration and use the existing pipeline debugger. Gotta love a little tweaking!
upvoted 0 times
...
Pilar
7 months ago
B) Use the existing pipeline debugger. Easy peasy!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
7 months ago
I’m leaning towards option D, but I’m a bit confused about whether a new controller debug configuration is really needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
7 months ago
I feel like we practiced a similar question where we had to decide between using existing tools or creating new ones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
7 months ago
I remember something about modifying existing configurations, so maybe option C is the right choice?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sarina
7 months ago
I think we might need to create a new debug configuration for the controller, but I'm not entirely sure if that's necessary.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicidad
8 months ago
Okay, let me think this through. The question says the UX Studio has a functioning pipeline debugger, so I'm guessing we can use that as a starting point. I'll go with option C and see if I can figure out how to modify the configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
8 months ago
I'm feeling pretty confident about this one. The question is pretty straightforward - we just need to modify the existing pipeline debugger to work with the new controller. Option C is the clear choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheridan
8 months ago
Option C sounds like the way to go. We just need to modify the existing debugger configuration to work with the new JavaScript controller. Shouldn't be too much of a hassle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
8 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The question mentions a pipeline and a controller, so I'm not sure if we can just use the existing pipeline debugger. Maybe we'll need to modify the configuration to work with the new controller?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
8 months ago
I think I'll go with option C. The question says the UX Studio has a functioning pipeline debugger, so I don't think we need to create a new script or controller debug configuration.
upvoted 0 times
Terina
2 months ago
Option C seems efficient. No need to start from scratch!
upvoted 0 times
...
Laila
2 months ago
Yeah, using the existing debugger is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julie
4 months ago
I agree with option C. It makes sense to modify what's already there.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel