Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location US
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Salesforce Exam B2C Commerce Developer Topic 4 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's B2C Commerce Developer exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 4
[All B2C Commerce Developer Questions]

A Digital Developer is working on a project to convert a pipeline to a JavaScript controller. UX Studio has a functioning pipeline debugger configured for the site. Assume the Developer will add a breakpoint to the controller when it is written.

What must be done in order to use the debugger with the new controller when it is written?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

by An at May 24, 2024, 03:41 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium B2C Commerce Developer Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Barrett
2 months ago
Option E: Throw the whole project out and start over with a new language. Who needs JavaScript anyway? I hear COBOL is making a comeback!
upvoted 0 times
Anna
5 days ago
C: Modify the debugger configuration and use the existing pipeline debugger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tawna
21 days ago
B: Use the existing pipeline debugger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Agustin
22 days ago
A: Create and use a new script debug configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ngoc
2 months ago
Oh, this is a tough one. I'm torn between B and C. Guess I'll have to flip a coin to decide. Or maybe I'll just ask the developer to do it for me. 'Hey, can you figure this out? I'm busy watching cat videos.'
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
2 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option D sounds like the safest bet to me. Creating a new controller debug configuration will ensure everything is set up correctly. Better safe than sorry, I say!
upvoted 0 times
Sabina
29 days ago
I think so too. Creating a new controller debug configuration will help avoid any potential issues down the line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharen
1 months ago
I agree, Option D does sound like the safest choice. It's always better to be thorough when setting up debugging tools.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Janessa
2 months ago
Hold on, I think option C is the way to go. Modifying the existing debugger configuration seems like the most efficient approach here. Why reinvent the wheel, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Kati
2 months ago
I'm not sure, maybe we could modify the debugger configuration instead of creating a new one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
2 months ago
Option B is the way to go! No need to create a new script or controller debug configuration when we can use the existing pipeline debugger. Smooth sailing ahead!
upvoted 0 times
Charlena
29 days ago
A) Exactly! It's always best to work with what we already have in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margarita
1 months ago
B) Great idea! It will save us time and effort.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
1 months ago
C) Modify the debugger configuration and use the existing pipeline debugger.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francisca
1 months ago
B) Use the existing pipeline debugger.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lachelle
2 months ago
I agree with Wilburn, creating a new script debug configuration seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilburn
2 months ago
I think we should create a new script debug configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel