New Year Sale 2026! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Exam - Topic 20 Question 52 Discussion

Actual exam question for Salesforce's Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) exam
Question #: 52
Topic #: 20
[All Salesforce Certified B2C Commerce Cloud Developer (Comm-Dev-101) Questions]

A job executes a pipeline that makes calls to an external system.

Which two actions prevent performance issues in this situation? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

0/2000 characters
Clare
3 months ago
I’ve always used asynchronous jobs, never had issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delisa
3 months ago
Agreed, B is a must. But A vs D is debatable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sheron
4 months ago
Wait, disabling multi-threading? That sounds risky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Jade
4 months ago
I think A is a better choice than D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanesa
4 months ago
Definitely B and C! Timeout is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audria
4 months ago
I feel like using synchronous jobs might be a safer option, but I need to double-check if that's what we covered in class.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joana
4 months ago
I practiced a similar question where disabling multi-threading was suggested, but I wonder if that really applies here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
5 months ago
I think configuring a timeout for the script pipelet could help, but I can't recall if it was mentioned as a primary action to prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Peggie
5 months ago
I remember discussing the importance of using asynchronous jobs to avoid blocking, but I'm not sure if that's the best choice here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ena
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a bit unsure about this one. I'll need to review the options and see which one best aligns with the Microsoft security recommendations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
5 months ago
Okay, let me walk through this step-by-step. Depreciation is an expense that reduces taxable income, so the "shield" must be referring to the reduction in taxes that results. I think B is the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margart
5 months ago
I'm pretty confident that the most appropriate presentation strategy would be standard celeration charts. That's the go-to tool for behavior analysts, and it's the best way to clearly communicate the data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
5 months ago
Hmm, I'm a little unsure about this one. The wording is a bit confusing - is it asking about the definition of "minutes" or something else? I'll need to re-read the question carefully.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
10 months ago
Disabling multi-threading? What is this, a single-threaded world? I'll take my chances with option D and leave the Stone Age behind.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linwood
10 months ago
Synchronous jobs? Are we still living in the dark ages? I'm going with option D, it's the only way to fly these days.
upvoted 0 times
Rochell
8 months ago
Using asynchronous jobs is the best choice for this situation. It's the modern way to handle external system calls.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
9 months ago
I agree, asynchronous jobs are much more efficient. Plus, they prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
9 months ago
Using asynchronous jobs will definitely help prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
9 months ago
Synchronous jobs are so outdated. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
9 months ago
I agree, asynchronous jobs are much more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruby
9 months ago
Synchronous jobs are so outdated. Option D is definitely the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aretha
10 months ago
Timeouts are definitely important, but I think option B is a bit of a bandaid. Why not just use asynchronous jobs and avoid the issue in the first place?
upvoted 0 times
Armando
9 months ago
I think having a timeout for the script pipelet is still important to avoid potential issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cheryll
9 months ago
That's true, but using synchronous jobs could also be a good option depending on the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
10 months ago
But wouldn't disabling multi-threading also help prevent performance issues?
upvoted 0 times
...
Carline
10 months ago
I agree, using asynchronous jobs would be a better long-term solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hoa
10 months ago
Haha, disabling multi-threading? That's like putting your computer in a time machine and going back to the 90s. I'll stick with option D, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
Rosita
10 months ago
User2: Yeah, I think option D is the way to go for better performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
10 months ago
User1: I agree, disabling multi-threading seems like a step backwards.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Verlene
10 months ago
I'm not sure about disabling multi-threading. But using asynchronous import or export jobs sounds like a good idea too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oliva
10 months ago
I agree with Lottie. Also, configuring a timeout for the script pipelet could be beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lottie
11 months ago
I think using synchronous import or export jobs could help prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rhea
11 months ago
I'm pretty sure option D is the way to go here. Using asynchronous jobs will prevent performance issues by not blocking the main thread while waiting for the external system to respond.
upvoted 0 times
Herminia
9 months ago
Using synchronous import or export jobs could also be a good option to prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
10 months ago
I'm not sure about option D, but I think configuring a timeout for the script pipelet could also help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
10 months ago
Agreed, using asynchronous jobs is a common practice to prevent performance issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nathan
10 months ago
I think option D is a good choice too. It will definitely help with performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel